Related papers: Conveying Imagistic Thinking in Traditional Chinese Medicine Translation: A Prompt Engineering and LLM-Based Evaluation Framework

Conveying Imagistic Thinking in Traditional Chinese Medicine Translation: A Prompt Engineering and LLM-Based Evaluation Framework

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01198v1
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2025 02:27:44 GMT
Title: Conveying Imagistic Thinking in Traditional Chinese Medicine Translation: A Prompt Engineering and LLM-Based Evaluation Framework
Authors: Jiatong Han,
Abstract summary: Existing English translations largely rely on literal rendering.<n>This study adopted a human-in-the-loop framework and selected four passages from the medical canon Huangdi Neijing that are fundamental in theory.
Score: 2.4294291235324867
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) theory is built on imagistic thinking, in which medical principles and diagnostic and therapeutic logic are structured through metaphor and metonymy. However, existing English translations largely rely on literal rendering, making it difficult for target-language readers to reconstruct the underlying conceptual networks and apply them in clinical practice. This study adopted a human-in-the-loop (HITL) framework and selected four passages from the medical canon Huangdi Neijing that are fundamental in theory. Through prompt-based cognitive scaffolding, DeepSeek V3.1 was guided to identify metaphor and metonymy in the source text and convey the theory in translation. In the evaluation stage, ChatGPT 5 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Pro were instructed by prompts to simulate three types of real-world readers. Human translations, baseline model translations, and prompt-adjusted translations were scored by the simulated readers across five cognitive dimensions, followed by structured interviews and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Results show that the prompt-adjusted LLM translations perform best across all five dimensions, with high cross-model and cross-role consistency. The interview themes reveal differences between human and machine translation, effective strategies for metaphor and metonymy transfer, and readers' cognitive preferences. This study provides a cognitive, efficient, and replicable HITL methodological pathway for the translation of ancient, concept-dense texts such as TCM.

Related papers

When Meanings Meet: Investigating the Emergence and Quality of Shared Concept Spaces during Multilingual Language Model Training [57.230355403478995]
We investigate the development of language-agnostic concept spaces during pretraining of EuroLLM.<n>We find that shared concept spaces emerge early and continue to refine, but that alignment with them is language-dependent.<n>In contrast to prior work, our fine-grained manual analysis reveals that some apparent gains in translation quality reflect shifts in behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T11:23:01Z)
Conveying Imagistic Thinking in TCM Translation: A Prompt Engineering and LLM-Based Evaluation Framework [2.4294291235324867]
Traditional Chinese Medicine theory is built on imagistic thinking, in which medical principles and diagnostic and therapeutic logic are structured through metaphor and metonymy.<n>This study adopted a human-in-the-loop framework and selected four passages from the medical canon Huangdi Neijing that are fundamental in theory.<n>DeepSeek V3.1 was guided to identify metaphor and metonymy in the source text and convey the theory in translation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-28T10:35:10Z)
Liaozhai through the Looking-Glass: On Paratextual Explicitation of Culture-Bound Terms in Machine Translation [70.43884512651668]
We formalize Genette's (1987) theory of paratexts from literary and translation studies to introduce the task of paratextual explicitation for machine translation.<n>We construct a dataset of 560 expert-aligned paratexts from four English translations of the classical Chinese short story collection Liaozhai.<n>Our findings demonstrate the potential of paratextual explicitation in advancing machine translation beyond linguistic equivalence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-27T16:27:36Z)
Comparing Large Language Models and Traditional Machine Translation Tools for Translating Medical Consultation Summaries: A Pilot Study [9.136745540182423]
This study evaluates how well large language models (LLMs) and traditional machine translation (MT) tools translate medical consultation summaries from English into Arabic, Chinese, and Vietnamese.<n>Results showed that traditional MT tools generally performed better, especially for complex texts.<n>Arabic translations improved with complexity due to the language's morphology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-23T10:31:33Z)
The Paradox of Poetic Intent in Back-Translation: Evaluating the Quality of Large Language Models in Chinese Translation [2.685668802278156]
This study constructs a diverse corpus encompassing Chinese scientific terminology, historical translation paradoxes, and literary metaphors.<n>We evaluate BLEU, CHRF, TER, and semantic similarity metrics across six major large language models (LLMs) and three traditional translation tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-22T21:48:05Z)
From Metaphor to Mechanism: How LLMs Decode Traditional Chinese Medicine Symbolic Language for Modern Clinical Relevance [3.3692821811360743]
We propose a novel multi-agent and chain-of-thought (CoT) framework designed to interpret Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) metaphors accurately and map them to Western medical concepts.<n>We detail a methodology for building a metaphor-rich TCM dataset, discuss strategies for effectively integrating multi-agent collaboration and CoT reasoning, and articulate the theoretical underpinnings that guide metaphor interpretation.<n>Our work aims to support clinical decision-making, cross-system educational initiatives, and integrated healthcare research, ultimately offering a robust scaffold for reconciling TCM's symbolic language with the mechanistic focus of Western medicine.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T16:22:49Z)
Large Language Models as Neurolinguistic Subjects: Discrepancy between Performance and Competence [49.60849499134362]
This study investigates the linguistic understanding of Large Language Models (LLMs) regarding signifier (form) and signified (meaning)<n>We introduce a neurolinguistic approach, utilizing a novel method that combines minimal pair and diagnostic probing to analyze activation patterns across model layers.<n>We found: (1) Psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic methods reveal that language performance and competence are distinct; (2) Direct probability measurement may not accurately assess linguistic competence; and (3) Instruction tuning won't change much competence but improve performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-12T04:16:44Z)
(Perhaps) Beyond Human Translation: Harnessing Multi-Agent Collaboration for Translating Ultra-Long Literary Texts [56.7988577327046]
We introduce TransAgents, a novel multi-agent framework that simulates the roles and collaborative practices of a human translation company.<n>Our findings highlight the potential of multi-agent collaboration in enhancing translation quality, particularly for longer texts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-20T05:55:08Z)
Clinical Named Entity Recognition using Contextualized Token Representations [49.036805795072645]
This paper introduces the technique of contextualized word embedding to better capture the semantic meaning of each word based on its context. We pre-train two deep contextualized language models, Clinical Embeddings from Language Model (C-ELMo) and Clinical Contextual String Embeddings (C-Flair) Explicit experiments show that our models gain dramatic improvements compared to both static word embeddings and domain-generic language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-23T18:12:58Z)
Translation Artifacts in Cross-lingual Transfer Learning [51.66536640084888]
We show that machine translation can introduce subtle artifacts that have a notable impact in existing cross-lingual models. In natural language inference, translating the premise and the hypothesis independently can reduce the lexical overlap between them. We also improve the state-of-the-art in XNLI for the translate-test and zero-shot approaches by 4.3 and 2.8 points, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-09T17:54:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.