How Market Volatility Shapes Algorithmic Collusion: A Comparative Analysis of Learning-Based Pricing Algorithms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02134v1
• Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2025 19:01:22 GMT
• Title: How Market Volatility Shapes Algorithmic Collusion: A Comparative Analysis of Learning-Based Pricing Algorithms
• Authors: Aheer Sravon, Md. Ibrahim, Devdyuti Mazumder, Ridwan Al Aziz,
• Abstract summary: This paper offers a thorough analysis of four pricing algorithms across three classic duopoly models (Logit, Hotelling, Linear) and under various demand-shock regimes created by auto-regressive processes.<n>Our findings reveal that reinforcement-learning algorithms often sustain supra-competitive prices under stable demand.<n>Despite marked changes in absolute performance, the relative rankings of the algorithms are consistent across different environments.
• Score: 1.3716158732399093
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Autonomous pricing algorithms are increasingly influencing competition in digital markets; however, their behavior under realistic demand conditions remains largely unexamined. This paper offers a thorough analysis of four pricing algorithms -- Q-Learning, PSO, Double DQN, and DDPG -- across three classic duopoly models (Logit, Hotelling, Linear) and under various demand-shock regimes created by auto-regressive processes. By utilizing profit- and price-based collusion indices, we investigate how the interactions among algorithms, market structure, and stochastic demand collaboratively influence competitive outcomes. Our findings reveal that reinforcement-learning algorithms often sustain supra-competitive prices under stable demand, with DDPG demonstrating the most pronounced collusive tendencies. Demand shocks produce notably varied effects: Logit markets suffer significant performance declines, Hotelling markets remain stable, and Linear markets experience shock-induced profit inflation. Despite marked changes in absolute performance, the relative rankings of the algorithms are consistent across different environments. These results underscore the critical importance of market structure and demand uncertainty in shaping algorithmic competition, while also contributing to the evolving policy discussions surrounding autonomous pricing behavior.

Related papers

• Online Dynamic Pricing of Complementary Products [45.90621357073487]
  We present an online learning algorithm considering both positive and negative interactions between products' demands.<n>Our solution improves the revenue w.r.t. a comparable learning algorithm ignoring such interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T10:12:51Z)
• Robust Reinforcement Learning in Finance: Modeling Market Impact with Elliptic Uncertainty Sets [57.179679246370114]
  In financial applications, reinforcement learning (RL) agents are commonly trained on historical data, where their actions do not influence prices.<n>During deployment, these agents trade in live markets where their own transactions can shift asset prices, a phenomenon known as market impact.<n>Traditional robust RL approaches address this model misspecification by optimizing the worst-case performance over a set of uncertainties.<n>We develop a novel class of elliptic uncertainty sets, enabling efficient and tractable robust policy evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T18:22:25Z)
• Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Pricing in Supply Chains: Benchmarking Strategic Agent Behaviours under Realistically Simulated Market Conditions [4.072683489517408]
  This study investigates how Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) can improve dynamic pricing strategies in supply chains.<n>MARL introduces emergent strategic behaviour not captured by static pricing rules and may inform future developments in dynamic pricing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T15:07:37Z)
• Impact of Price Inflation on Algorithmic Collusion Through Reinforcement Learning Agents [2.3335538710129193]
  This study examines the role of inflation in influencing algorithmic collusion within competitive markets.<n>By incorporating inflation shocks into a RL-based pricing model, we analyze whether agents adapt their strategies to sustain supra-competitive profits.<n>Results suggest that inflation amplifies non-competitive dynamics in algorithmic pricing, emphasizing the need for regulatory oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T01:00:03Z)
• Homogeneous Algorithms Can Reduce Competition in Personalized Pricing [2.6153256849514994]
  We study the impact of correlated algorithms on competition in the context of personalized pricing.<n>Our results underscore the ease with which algorithms facilitate price correlation without overt communication.<n>We analyze the implications of our results on the application and interpretation of US antitrust law.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T18:43:36Z)
• Deviations from the Nash equilibrium and emergence of tacit collusion in a two-player optimal execution game with reinforcement learning [0.9208007322096533]
  We study a scenario in which two autonomous agents learn to liquidate the same asset optimally in the presence of market impact. Our results show that the strategies learned by the agents deviate significantly from the Nash equilibrium of the corresponding market impact game. We explore how different levels of market volatility influence the agents' performance and the equilibria they discover.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T16:54:53Z)
• Online Search with Predictions: Pareto-optimal Algorithm and its Applications in Energy Markets [32.50099216716867]
  This paper develops learning-augmented algorithms for energy trading in volatile electricity markets. We incorporate machine-learned predictions to design competitive algorithms for online search problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T04:12:10Z)
• Deep Q-Learning Market Makers in a Multi-Agent Simulated Stock Market [58.720142291102135]
  This paper focuses precisely on the study of these markets makers strategies from an agent-based perspective. We propose the application of Reinforcement Learning (RL) for the creation of intelligent market markers in simulated stock markets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T14:55:21Z)
• Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedback [139.29934476625488]
  We develop a framework and algorithms for learning stable market outcomes under uncertainty. Our work takes a first step toward elucidating when and how stable matchings arise in large, data-driven marketplaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-19T17:59:28Z)
• Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching Markets: Uncertain Preferences and Strategic Behaviors [91.3755431537592]
  This article develops a framework for learning optimal strategies in real-world matching markets. We show that there exists a welfare-versus-fairness trade-off that is characterized by the uncertainty level of acceptance. We prove that participants can be better off with multi-stage matching compared to single-stage matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-13T19:25:52Z)
• Optimal Robustness-Consistency Trade-offs for Learning-Augmented Online Algorithms [85.97516436641533]
  We study the problem of improving the performance of online algorithms by incorporating machine-learned predictions. The goal is to design algorithms that are both consistent and robust. We provide the first set of non-trivial lower bounds for competitive analysis using machine-learned predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T04:51:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.