Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning and Real-Time Decision-Making in Robotic Soccer for Virtual Environments
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03166v1
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 19:11:44 GMT
- Title: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning and Real-Time Decision-Making in Robotic Soccer for Virtual Environments
- Authors: Aya Taourirte, Md Sohag Mia,
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a unified Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) framework that addresses these challenges.<n>To ensure scalability, we integrate mean-field theory into the HRL framework.<n>Our mean-field actor-critic method achieves a significant performance boost.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The deployment of multi-agent systems in dynamic, adversarial environments like robotic soccer necessitates real-time decision-making, sophisticated cooperation, and scalable algorithms to avoid the curse of dimensionality. While Reinforcement Learning (RL) offers a promising framework, existing methods often struggle with the multi-granularity of tasks (long-term strategy vs. instant actions) and the complexity of large-scale agent interactions. This paper presents a unified Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) framework that addresses these challenges. First, we establish a baseline using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) within a client-server architecture for real-time action scheduling, with PPO demonstrating superior performance (4.32 avg. goals, 82.9% ball control). Second, we introduce a Hierarchical RL (HRL) structure based on the options framework to decompose the problem into a high-level trajectory planning layer (modeled as a Semi-Markov Decision Process) and a low-level action execution layer, improving global strategy (avg. goals increased to 5.26). Finally, to ensure scalability, we integrate mean-field theory into the HRL framework, simplifying many-agent interactions into a single agent vs. the population average. Our mean-field actor-critic method achieves a significant performance boost (5.93 avg. goals, 89.1% ball control, 92.3% passing accuracy) and enhanced training stability. Extensive simulations of 4v4 matches in the Webots environment validate our approach, demonstrating its potential for robust, scalable, and cooperative behavior in complex multi-agent domains.
Related papers
- MARTI-MARS$^2$: Scaling Multi-Agent Self-Search via Reinforcement Learning for Code Generation [64.2621682259008]
Multi-Agent Reinforced Training and Inference Framework with Self-Search Scaling (MARTI-MARS2)<n>We propose a Multi-Agent Reinforced Training and Inference Framework with Self-Search Scaling (MARTI-MARS2) to integrate policy learning with multi-agent tree search.<n>We show that MARTI-MARS2 achieves 77.7%, outperforming strong baselines like GPT-5.1 on challenging code generation benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-08T07:28:44Z) - Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems [79.64446272302287]
We formalize a definition for agent evaluation and characterize scaling laws as the interplay between agent quantity, coordination structure, modelic, and task properties.<n>We derive a predictive model using coordination metrics, that cross-validated R2=0, enabling prediction on unseen task domains.<n>We identify three effects: (1) a tool-coordination trade-off: under fixed computational budgets, tool-heavy tasks suffer disproportionately from multi-agent overhead, and (2) a capability saturation: coordination yields diminishing or negative returns once single-agent baselines exceed 45%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-09T06:52:21Z) - AgentGym-RL: Training LLM Agents for Long-Horizon Decision Making through Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning [129.44038804430542]
We introduce AgentGym-RL, a new framework to train LLM agents for multi-turn interactive decision-making through RL.<n>We propose ScalingInter-RL, a training approach designed for exploration-exploitation balance and stable RL optimization.<n>Our agents match or surpass commercial models on 27 tasks across diverse environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-10T16:46:11Z) - AgentGroupChat-V2: Divide-and-Conquer Is What LLM-Based Multi-Agent System Need [35.88121318813734]
Large language model based multi-agent systems have demonstrated significant potential in social simulation and complex task resolution domains.<n>We introduce AgentGroupChat-V2, a novel framework addressing these challenges through three core innovations.<n>Experiments demonstrate AgentGroupChat-V2's superior performance across diverse domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-18T13:24:04Z) - Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment [90.6117569025754]
Reinforcement learning from human feedback has emerged as an effective technique to align Large Language models.<n>Controlled Decoding provides a mechanism for aligning a model at inference time without retraining.<n>We propose a mixture of agent-based decoding strategies leveraging the existing off-the-shelf aligned LLM policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T17:34:25Z) - MAGNNET: Multi-Agent Graph Neural Network-based Efficient Task Allocation for Autonomous Vehicles with Deep Reinforcement Learning [2.5022287664959446]
We introduce a novel framework that integrates graph neural networks (GNNs) with a centralized training and decentralized execution (CTDE) paradigm.<n>Our approach enables unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) to dynamically allocate tasks efficiently without necessitating central coordination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-04T13:29:56Z) - PARCO: Parallel AutoRegressive Models for Multi-Agent Combinatorial Optimization [25.209951743372855]
PARCO is a reinforcement learning framework designed to construct high-quality solutions for multi-agent tasks efficiently.<n>We evaluate PARCO in multi-agent vehicle routing and scheduling problems, where our approach outperforms state-of-the-art learning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-05T17:49:18Z) - Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Opponent Modeling for
Distributed Multi-agent Cooperation [13.670618752160594]
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) provides a promising approach for multi-agent cooperation through the interaction of the agents and environments.
Traditional DRL solutions suffer from the high dimensions of multiple agents with continuous action space during policy search.
We propose a hierarchical reinforcement learning approach with high-level decision-making and low-level individual control for efficient policy search.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-25T19:09:29Z) - Locality Matters: A Scalable Value Decomposition Approach for
Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [52.7873574425376]
Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) faces significant scalability issues due to state and action spaces that are exponentially large in the number of agents.
We propose a novel, value-based multi-agent algorithm called LOMAQ, which incorporates local rewards in the Training Decentralized Execution paradigm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-22T10:08:15Z) - MALib: A Parallel Framework for Population-based Multi-agent
Reinforcement Learning [61.28547338576706]
Population-based multi-agent reinforcement learning (PB-MARL) refers to the series of methods nested with reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms.
We present MALib, a scalable and efficient computing framework for PB-MARL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-05T03:27:08Z) - F2A2: Flexible Fully-decentralized Approximate Actor-critic for
Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [110.35516334788687]
Decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms are sometimes unpractical in complicated applications.
We propose a flexible fully decentralized actor-critic MARL framework, which can handle large-scale general cooperative multi-agent setting.
Our framework can achieve scalability and stability for large-scale environment and reduce information transmission.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-17T14:56:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.