A Preliminary Study on the Promises and Challenges of Native Top-$k$ Sparse Attention
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03494v1
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 06:44:02 GMT
- Title: A Preliminary Study on the Promises and Challenges of Native Top-$k$ Sparse Attention
- Authors: Di Xiu, Hongyin Tang, Bolin Rong, Lizhi Yan, Jingang Wang, Yifan Lu, Xunliang Cai,
- Abstract summary: This report conducts a preliminary investigation into the effectiveness and theoretical mechanisms of the Top-$k$ Attention mechanism.<n>Experiments demonstrate that exact Top-$k$ Decoding achieves performance comparable to, or even surpassing, full attention on downstream tasks.<n>Considering the high computational complexity of exact Top-$k$ Attention, we investigate the impact of approximate Top-$k$ algorithm precision on downstream tasks.
- Score: 33.03212783462742
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly prevalent in the field of long-context modeling, however, their inference computational costs have become a critical bottleneck hindering the advancement of tasks such as agents and multimodal applications. This report conducts a preliminary investigation into the effectiveness and theoretical mechanisms of the Top-$k$ Attention mechanism during both the decoding and training phases. First, we validate the effectiveness of exact Top-$k$ Decoding through extensive experimentation. Experiments demonstrate that retaining only the pivotal Keys with the highest similarity to the Query as the context window during the decoding stage achieves performance comparable to, or even surpassing, full attention on downstream tasks such as HELMET and LongBench v2. Second, we further explore the native Top-$k$ Attention training strategy. Experiments confirm that ensuring the consistency between training and inference regarding Top-$k$ Attention operations facilitates the further unlocking of Top-$k$ Decoding's potential, thereby significantly enhancing model performance. Furthermore, considering the high computational complexity of exact Top-$k$ Attention, we investigate the impact of approximate Top-$k$ algorithm precision on downstream tasks. Our research confirms a positive correlation between downstream task performance and approximation fidelity, and we provide statistical evaluations of the Lightning Indexer's precision within the DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp model. Finally, this report provides a theoretical interpretation from the perspective of Entropy. Experimental observations indicate that models subjected to Top-$k$ Attention SFT exhibit a distinct phenomenon of entropy reduction in downstream tasks, which validates the hypothesis that low-entropy states are better adapted to Top-$k$ Decoding.
Related papers
- Is Softmax Loss All You Need? A Principled Analysis of Softmax-family Loss [91.61796429377041]
The Softmax loss is one of the most widely employed surrogate objectives for classification and ranking tasks.<n>We investigate whether different surrogates achieve consistency with classification and ranking metrics, and analyze their gradient dynamics to reveal distinct convergence behaviors.<n>Our results establish a principled foundation and offer practical guidance for loss selections in large-class machine learning applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T09:24:52Z) - How to Set the Learning Rate for Large-Scale Pre-training? [73.03133634525635]
We formalize this investigation into two distinct research paradigms: Fitting and Transfer.<n>Within the Fitting Paradigm, we introduce a Scaling Law for search factor, effectively reducing the search complexity from O(n3) to O(n*C_D*C_) via predictive modeling.<n>We extend the principles of $$Transfer to the Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, broadening its applicability to encompass model depth, weight decay, and token horizons.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-08T15:55:13Z) - Efficient Thought Space Exploration through Strategic Intervention [54.35208611253168]
We propose a novel Hint-Practice Reasoning (HPR) framework that operationalizes this insight through two synergistic components.<n>The framework's core innovation lies in Distributional Inconsistency Reduction (DIR), which dynamically identifies intervention points.<n> Experiments across arithmetic and commonsense reasoning benchmarks demonstrate HPR's state-of-the-art efficiency-accuracy tradeoffs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T07:26:01Z) - CURE: Critical-Token-Guided Re-Concatenation for Entropy-Collapse Prevention [24.71056659948577]
We introduce CURE (Critical-token-gUided Re concatenation for Entropy-collapse prevention), a two-stage framework that balances exploration and exploitation.<n>CURE achieves a 5% performance gain across six math benchmarks, establishing state-of-the-art performance in both entropy and accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-14T18:40:34Z) - EpiCoDe: Boosting Model Performance Beyond Training with Extrapolation and Contrastive Decoding [50.29046178980637]
EpiCoDe is a method that boosts model performance in data-scarcity scenarios without extra training.<n>We show that EpiCoDe consistently outperforms existing methods with significant and robust improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-04T02:11:54Z) - Supervised Optimism Correction: Be Confident When LLMs Are Sure [91.7459076316849]
We establish a novel theoretical connection between supervised fine-tuning and offline reinforcement learning.<n>We show that the widely used beam search method suffers from unacceptable over-optimism.<n>We propose Supervised Optimism Correction, which introduces a simple yet effective auxiliary loss for token-level $Q$-value estimations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-10T07:50:03Z) - OVM, Outcome-supervised Value Models for Planning in Mathematical Reasoning [15.59540726867483]
We argue that in guided decoding, assessing the potential of an incomplete reasoning path can be more advantageous than simply ensuring per-step correctness.
Inspired by the findings that $textitoutcome supervision for guided decoding essentially acts as a value model, we propose Outcome-supervised Value Model (OVM)
Our experiments on two multi-step mathematical reasoning datasets, GSM8K and Game of 24, demonstrate the superior performance of the OVM model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T09:56:28Z) - Ladder-of-Thought: Using Knowledge as Steps to Elevate Stance Detection [73.31406286956535]
We introduce the Ladder-of-Thought (LoT) for the stance detection task.
LoT directs the small LMs to assimilate high-quality external knowledge, refining the intermediate rationales produced.
Our empirical evaluations underscore LoT's efficacy, marking a 16% improvement over GPT-3.5 and a 10% enhancement compared to GPT-3.5 with CoT on stance detection task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-31T14:31:48Z) - Efficient Epistemic Uncertainty Estimation in Regression Ensemble Models Using Pairwise-Distance Estimators [12.460684753030899]
Pairwise-distance estimators (PaiDEs) establish bounds on entropy.<n>Unlike sample-based Monte Carlo estimators, PaiDEs exhibit a remarkable capability to estimate epistemic uncertainty at speeds up to 100 times faster.<n>We compare our approach to existing active learning methods and find that our approach outperforms on high-dimensional regression tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-25T17:13:42Z) - Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Training Deep Networks [83.44219640437657]
Deep learning models are prone to learning spurious correlations that should not be learned as predictive clues.
We propose a causality-based training framework to reduce the spurious correlations caused by observable confounders.
We conduct experiments on two real-world tasks: Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Image Captioning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T17:47:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.