Parajudica: An RDF-Based Reasoner and Metamodel for Multi-Framework Context-Dependent Data Compliance Assessments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05453v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2025 06:16:34 GMT
• Title: Parajudica: An RDF-Based Reasoner and Metamodel for Multi-Framework Context-Dependent Data Compliance Assessments
• Abstract summary: Parajudica is an open, modular, and RDF/SPARQL-based rule system for evaluating context-dependent data compliance status.<n>We demonstrate the utility of this resource and accompanying metamodel through application to existing legal frameworks and industry standards.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Motivated by the challenges of implementing policy-based data access control (PBAC) under multiple simultaneously applicable compliance frameworks, we present Parajudica, an open, modular, and extensible RDF/SPARQL-based rule system for evaluating context-dependent data compliance status. We demonstrate the utility of this resource and accompanying metamodel through application to existing legal frameworks and industry standards, offering insights for comparative framework analysis. Applications include compliance policy enforcement, compliance monitoring, data discovery, and risk assessment.

Related papers

• AspisAI: A Canonical, Machine-Interpretable Governance Framework for Automated Multi-Standard Compliance Monitoring [0.0]
  This paper presents emphAspisAI, a bounded, standard-agnostic governance framework that translates selected requirements into a canonical, machine-interpretable control model.<n>Within a bounded scope of 26 representative requirements, the framework is evaluated in a controlled simulation against five governance-oriented criteria.<n>Results include full requirement encoding, 88.5,% mapping coverage, complete traceability, and correct detection of all introduced gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T22:37:12Z)
• A Formally Grounded ODRL Evaluator: Implementation and Comparison [0.06524460254566902]
  We present the first ODRL Evaluator with transparent formal semantics and supporting all rule types.<n>We experimentally measure its performance, analysing different scalability dimensions related to policy complexity and size of the data on which a policy is evaluated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T14:24:06Z)
• PolicyGuard: From Organizational Policies to Neuro-SymbolicCompliance Review Engines [5.18270310844006]
  PolicyGuard is a neuro-symbolic framework for policy-grounded document compliance review.<n>It converts organizational policy guidance into an executable review engine consisting of typed logic rules and atom-level extraction questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-30T17:37:57Z)
• Citation-Closure Retrieval and Per-Rule Attribution for Real-World Regulatory Compliance Question Answering [54.97384993676565]
  We formalize Regulatory Compliance QA with RegOps-Bench, a novel benchmark featuring an Operational Knowledge Graph derived from complex national R&D regulations.<n>RefWalk traverses cross-document citations, fuses multi-view candidates via max-based aggregation, and enforces per-rule attribution to explicitly map claims to sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T10:38:38Z)
• PolicyLLM: Towards Excellent Comprehension of Public Policy for Large Language Models [56.37206340175191]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into real-world decision-making.<n>Yet, their ability to comprehend and reason about policy-related content remains underexplored.<n>We present textbftextitPolicyBench, the first large-scale cross-system benchmark (US-China) evaluating policy comprehension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T17:27:50Z)
• Compliance Management for Federated Data Processing [1.3836910960262496]
  Federated data processing (FDP) offers a promising approach for enabling collaborative analysis of sensitive data without centralizing raw datasets.<n>We present a framework for compliance-aware FDP that integrates policy-as-code, workflow orchestration, and large language model (LLM)-assisted compliance management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-22T22:10:25Z)
• Doc-PP: Document Policy Preservation Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [13.70855540464427]
  We introduce Doc-PP, a novel benchmark constructed from real-world reports requiring reasoning across heterogeneous visual and textual elements under strict non-disclosure policies.<n>Our evaluation highlights a systemic Reasoning-Induced Safety Gap: models frequently leak sensitive information when answers must be inferred through complex synthesis or aggregated across modalities.<n>We propose DVA, a structural inference framework that decouples reasoning from policy verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T13:45:39Z)
• From Reports to Reality: Testing Consistency in Instagram's Digital Services Act Compliance Data [0.0]
  The Digital Services Act (DSA) introduces rules for content moderation and platform governance in the European Union.<n>This study examined compliance with DSA requirements, focusing on Instagram.<n>We develop and apply a multi-level consistency framework to evaluate DSA compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T15:13:25Z)
• Standard Applicability Judgment and Cross-jurisdictional Reasoning: A RAG-based Framework for Medical Device Compliance [3.439579933384111]
  Given a free-text device description, our system retrieves candidate standards from a curated corpus and uses large language models to infer jurisdiction-specific applicability.<n>We construct an international benchmark dataset of medical device descriptions with expert-annotated standard mappings, and evaluate our system against retrieval-only, zero-shot, and rule-based baselines.<n>The proposed approach attains a classification accuracy of 73% and a Top-5 retrieval recall of 87%, demonstrating its effectiveness in identifying relevant regulatory standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T11:04:58Z)
• Position: Restructuring of Categories and Implementation of Guidelines Essential for VLM Adoption in Healthcare [5.9372801317341155]
  Vision language model (VLM) development requires clear and standardized reporting protocols.<n>Traditional machine learning reporting standards and evaluation guidelines must be restructured to accommodate multiphase VLM studies.<n>We propose a categorization framework for VLM studies and outline corresponding reporting standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T18:39:54Z)
• SPoRt -- Safe Policy Ratio: Certified Training and Deployment of Task Policies in Model-Free RL [54.022106606140774]
  We present theoretical results that place a bound on the probability of violating a safety property for a new task-specific policy in a model-free, episodic setting.<n>This bound can be applied to temporally-extended properties (beyond safety) and to robust control problems.<n>We present experimental results demonstrating this trade-off and comparing the theoretical bound to posterior bounds derived from empirical violation rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T19:09:07Z)
• Lawful and Accountable Personal Data Processing with GDPR-based Access and Usage Control in Distributed Systems [0.0]
  This paper proposes a case-generic method for automated normative reasoning that establishes legal arguments for the lawfulness of data processing activities.<n>The arguments are established on the basis of case-specific legal qualifications made by privacy experts, bringing the human in the loop.<n>The resulting system is designed and critically assessed in reference to requirements extracted from the GPDR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T10:49:34Z)
• Few-shot Policy (de)composition in Conversational Question Answering [54.259440408606515]
  We propose a neuro-symbolic framework to detect policy compliance using large language models (LLMs) in a few-shot setting.<n>We show that our approach soundly reasons about policy compliance conversations by extracting sub-questions to be answered, assigning truth values from contextual information, and explicitly producing a set of logic statements from the given policies.<n>We apply this approach to the popular PCD and conversational machine reading benchmark, ShARC, and show competitive performance with no task-specific finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T08:40:15Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• Top-K Pairwise Ranking: Bridging the Gap Among Ranking-Based Measures for Multi-Label Classification [120.37051160567277]
  This paper proposes a novel measure named Top-K Pairwise Ranking (TKPR) A series of analyses show that TKPR is compatible with existing ranking-based measures. On the other hand, we establish a sharp generalization bound for the proposed framework based on a novel technique named data-dependent contraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T09:36:37Z)
• LLM4Rerank: LLM-based Auto-Reranking Framework for Recommendations [51.76373105981212]
  Reranking is a critical component in recommender systems, playing an essential role in refining the output of recommendation algorithms.<n>We introduce a comprehensive reranking framework, designed to seamlessly integrate various reranking criteria.<n>A customizable input mechanism is also integrated, enabling the tuning of the language model's focus to meet specific reranking needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T09:29:18Z)
• Adversarial Model for Offline Reinforcement Learning [39.77825908168264]
  We propose a model-based offline Reinforcement Learning framework, called Adversarial Model for Offline Reinforcement Learning (ARMOR) ARMOR can robustly learn policies to improve upon an arbitrary reference policy regardless of data coverage. We show that ARMOR achieves competent performance with both state-of-the-art offline model-free and model-based RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T23:08:09Z)
• Relational Action Bases: Formalization, Effective Safety Verification, and Invariants (Extended Version) [67.99023219822564]
  We introduce the general framework of relational action bases (RABs) RABs generalize existing models by lifting both restrictions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on a benchmark of data-aware business processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-12T17:03:50Z)
• An Automated Framework for Supporting Data-Governance Rule Compliance in Decentralized MIMO Contexts [10.62414957574478]
  Dr.Aid is a logic-based AI framework for automated compliance checking of data governance rules over data-flow graphs. Dr.Aid models data rules and flow rules and checks compliance by reasoning about the propagation, combination, modification and application of data rules over the data flow graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T10:53:03Z)
• Query Focused Multi-Document Summarization with Distant Supervision [88.39032981994535]
  Existing work relies heavily on retrieval-style methods for estimating the relevance between queries and text segments. We propose a coarse-to-fine modeling framework which introduces separate modules for estimating whether segments are relevant to the query. We demonstrate that our framework outperforms strong comparison systems on standard QFS benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T22:35:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.