Complementary Learning Approach for Text Classification using Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07583v1
• Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 14:26:31 GMT
• Title: Complementary Learning Approach for Text Classification using Large Language Models
• Authors: Navid Asgari, Benjamin M. Cole,
• Abstract summary: We propose a structured methodology that utilizes large language models (LLMs) in a cost-efficient and parsimonious manner.<n>Our methodology, facilitated through a chain of thought and few-shot learning prompting from computer science, extends best practices for co-author teams in qualitative research to human-machine teams in quantitative research.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In this study, we propose a structured methodology that utilizes large language models (LLMs) in a cost-efficient and parsimonious manner, integrating the strengths of scholars and machines while offsetting their respective weaknesses. Our methodology, facilitated through a chain of thought and few-shot learning prompting from computer science, extends best practices for co-author teams in qualitative research to human-machine teams in quantitative research. This allows humans to utilize abductive reasoning and natural language to interrogate not just what the machine has done but also what the human has done. Our method highlights how scholars can manage inherent weaknesses OF LLMs using careful, low-cost techniques. We demonstrate how to use the methodology to interrogate human-machine rating discrepancies for a sample of 1,934 press releases announcing pharmaceutical alliances (1990-2017).

Related papers

• AI Sprints: Towards a Critical Method for Human-AI Collaboration [0.0]
  This article introduces the possibility for new forms of humanistic inquiry through what I term 'AI sprints'<n>I demonstrate how tight loops of iterative development can adapt data and book sprint methodologies whilst acknowledging the profound transformations generative AI introduces.<n>The paper contributes both a practical methodology for intensive AI-augmented research and a theoretical framework for understanding the transformations of this hybrid method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-13T15:56:11Z)
• Automated Novelty Evaluation of Academic Paper: A Collaborative Approach Integrating Human and Large Language Model Knowledge [9.208744138848765]
  One of the most common types of novelty in academic papers is the introduction of new methods.<n>In this paper, we propose leveraging human knowledge and LLM to assist pretrained language models (PLMs) in predicting the method novelty of papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T14:03:55Z)
• Chain of Methodologies: Scaling Test Time Computation without Training [77.85633949575046]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with complex reasoning tasks due to insufficient in-depth insights in their training data.<n>This paper introduces the Chain of the (CoM) framework that enhances structured thinking by integrating human methodological insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T03:46:50Z)
• Controlling Difficulty of Generated Text for AI-Assisted Language Learning [37.329743597873104]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate text at a near-native level of complexity, making them ill-suited for beginner learners.<n>We investigate whether controllable generation techniques can adapt LLM outputs to better support absolute beginners.<n>Our findings show that while prompting alone fails to control output difficulty, the use of future discriminators significantly improves output comprehensibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T15:38:21Z)
• Investigating Persuasion Techniques in Arabic: An Empirical Study Leveraging Large Language Models [0.13980986259786224]
  This paper presents a comprehensive empirical study focused on identifying persuasive techniques in Arabic social media content. We utilize Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) and leverage the ArAlEval dataset. Our study explores three different learning approaches by harnessing the power of PLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T15:55:09Z)
• Combatting Human Trafficking in the Cyberspace: A Natural Language Processing-Based Methodology to Analyze the Language in Online Advertisements [55.2480439325792]
  This project tackles the pressing issue of human trafficking in online C2C marketplaces through advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. We introduce a novel methodology for generating pseudo-labeled datasets with minimal supervision, serving as a rich resource for training state-of-the-art NLP models. A key contribution is the implementation of an interpretability framework using Integrated Gradients, providing explainable insights crucial for law enforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T02:45:01Z)
• Re-Reading Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models [87.46256176508376]
  We introduce a simple, yet general and effective prompting method, Re2, to enhance the reasoning capabilities of off-the-shelf Large Language Models (LLMs) Unlike most thought-eliciting prompting methods, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT), Re2 shifts the focus to the input by processing questions twice, thereby enhancing the understanding process. We evaluate Re2 on extensive reasoning benchmarks across 14 datasets, spanning 112 experiments, to validate its effectiveness and generality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T14:36:23Z)
• Towards More Human-like AI Communication: A Review of Emergent Communication Research [0.0]
  Emergent communication (Emecom) is a field of research aiming to develop artificial agents capable of using natural language. In this review, we delineate all the common proprieties we find across the literature and how they relate to human interactions. We identify two subcategories and highlight their characteristics and open challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T14:43:10Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey [53.6014921995006]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on extensive textual corpora have emerged as leading solutions for a broad array of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Despite their notable performance, these models are prone to certain limitations such as misunderstanding human instructions, generating potentially biased content, or factually incorrect information. This survey presents a comprehensive overview of these alignment technologies, including the following aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T17:44:58Z)
• Evaluating Language Models for Mathematics through Interactions [116.67206980096513]
  We introduce CheckMate, a prototype platform for humans to interact with and evaluate large language models (LLMs) We conduct a study with CheckMate to evaluate three language models (InstructGPT, ChatGPT, and GPT-4) as assistants in proving undergraduate-level mathematics. We derive a taxonomy of human behaviours and uncover that despite a generally positive correlation, there are notable instances of divergence between correctness and perceived helpfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T17:12:25Z)
• Individual Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Survey for Practitioners [69.02688684221265]
  The use of sophisticated statistical models that influence decisions in domains of high societal relevance is on the rise. Many governments, institutions, and companies are reluctant to their adoption as their output is often difficult to explain in human-interpretable ways. Recently, the academic literature has proposed a substantial amount of methods for providing interpretable explanations to machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T01:46:34Z)
• Learning to Complement Humans [67.38348247794949]
  A rising vision for AI in the open world centers on the development of systems that can complement humans for perceptual, diagnostic, and reasoning tasks. We demonstrate how an end-to-end learning strategy can be harnessed to optimize the combined performance of human-machine teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T20:00:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.