AI Didn't Start the Fire: Examining the Stack Exchange Moderator and Contributor Strike

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.08884v1
• Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 18:19:42 GMT
• Title: AI Didn't Start the Fire: Examining the Stack Exchange Moderator and Contributor Strike
• Authors: Yiwei Wu, Leah Ajmani, Nathan TeBlunthuis, Hanlin Li,
• Abstract summary: We investigate a conflict between the Stack Exchange platform and community that occurred in 2023 around an emergency arising from the release of large language models (LLMs)<n>We show how the 2023 conflict was preceded by a long-term deterioration in the community-platform relationship driven in particular by the platform's disregard for the community's highly-valued participatory role in governance.<n>We recommend ways that platforms and communities can institute participatory governance to be durable and effective.
• Score: 6.538542549579634
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Online communities and their host platforms are mutually dependent yet conflict-prone. When platform policies clash with community values, communities have resisted through strikes, blackouts, and even migration to other platforms. Through such collective actions, communities have sometimes won concessions but these have frequently proved temporary. Prior research has investigated strike events and migration chains, but the processes by which community-platform conflict unfolds remain obscure. How do community-platform relationships deteriorate? How do communities organize collective action? How do participants proceed in the aftermath? We investigate a conflict between the Stack Exchange platform and community that occurred in 2023 around an emergency arising from the release of large language models (LLMs). Based on a qualitative thematic analysis of 2,070 messages on Meta Stack Exchange and 14 interviews with community members, we surface how the 2023 conflict was preceded by a long-term deterioration in the community-platform relationship driven in particular by the platform's disregard for the community's highly-valued participatory role in governance. Moreover, the platform's policy response to LLMs aggravated the community's sense of crisis triggering the strike mobilization. We analyze how the mobilization was coordinated through a tiered leadership and communication structure, as well as how community members pivoted in the aftermath. Building on recent theoretical scholarship in social computing, we use Hirshman's exit, voice and loyalty framework to theorize the challenges of community-platform relations evinced in our data. Finally, we recommend ways that platforms and communities can institute participatory governance to be durable and effective.

Related papers

• Reddit Deplatforming and Toxicity Dynamics on Generalist Voat Communities [73.88859384645264]
  Deplatforming, the permanent banning of entire communities, is a primary tool for content moderation on mainstream platforms.<n>We analyze four major Reddit ban waves (2015--2020) and their effects on generalist communities on Voat.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-26T19:13:45Z)
• Community Moderation and the New Epistemology of Fact Checking on Social Media [124.26693978503339]
  Social media platforms have traditionally relied on independent fact-checking organizations to identify and flag misleading content.<n>X (formerly Twitter) and Meta have shifted towards community-driven content moderation by launching their own versions of crowd-sourced fact-checking.<n>We examine the current approaches to misinformation detection across major platforms, explore the emerging role of community-driven moderation, and critically evaluate both the promises and challenges of crowd-checking at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T14:50:18Z)
• Multi-Platform Aggregated Dataset of Online Communities (MADOC) [64.45797970830233]
  MADOC aggregates and standardizes data from Bluesky, Koo, Reddit, and Voat (2012-2024), containing 18.9 million posts, 236 million comments, and 23.1 million unique users.<n>The dataset enables comparative studies of toxic behavior evolution across platforms through standardized interaction records and sentiment analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-22T14:02:11Z)
• iDRAMA-Scored-2024: A Dataset of the Scored Social Media Platform from 2020 to 2023 [22.685953309889825]
  We release a large-scale dataset from Scored, an alternative Reddit platform. At least 58 communities identified as migrating from Reddit and over 950 communities created since the platform's inception. We provide sentence embeddings of all posts in our dataset, generated through a state-of-the-art model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T16:34:03Z)
• Understanding Online Migration Decisions Following the Banning of Radical Communities [0.2752817022620644]
  We study how factors associated with the RECRO radicalization framework relate to users' migration decisions. Our results show that individual-level factors, those relating to the behavior of users, are associated with the decision to post on the fringe platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-09T10:43:15Z)
• Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
  We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z)
• On the Relation Between Opinion Change and Information Consumption on Reddit [22.387666772159974]
  We study the relationship between one user's opinion change episode and subsequent behavioral change on an online social media, Reddit. We find that people who report an opinion change are significantly more likely to change their future participation in a specific subset of online communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T13:34:16Z)
• This Must Be the Place: Predicting Engagement of Online Communities in a Large-scale Distributed Campaign [70.69387048368849]
  We study the behavior of communities with millions of active members. We develop a hybrid model, combining textual cues, community meta-data, and structural properties. We demonstrate the applicability of our model through Reddit's r/place a large-scale online experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T08:23:16Z)
• Community evolution in retweet networks [0.45880283710344055]
  We propose an approach that tracks two aspects of community evolution in retweet networks: flow of the members in, out and between the communities, and their influence. For community detection, we propose a two-stage approach. In the first stage, we apply an enhanced Louvain algorithm, called Ensemble Louvain, to find stable communities. For the detected communities, we compute internal and external influence, and for individual users, the retweet h-index influence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-13T12:08:28Z)
• CASS: Towards Building a Social-Support Chatbot for Online Health Community [67.45813419121603]
  The CASS architecture is based on advanced neural network algorithms. It can handle new inputs from users and generate a variety of responses to them. With a follow-up field experiment, CASS is proven useful in supporting individual members who seek emotional support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-04T05:52:03Z)
• Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics [43.98568073610101]
  We use a social media model to quantify the impacts of several adversarial manipulation tactics on the quality of content. We find that the presence of influential accounts, a hallmark of social media, exacerbates the vulnerabilities of online communities to manipulation. These insights suggest countermeasures that platforms could employ to increase the resilience of social media users to manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-13T21:12:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.