Reddit Deplatforming and Toxicity Dynamics on Generalist Voat Communities
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22348v1
- Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2025 19:13:45 GMT
- Title: Reddit Deplatforming and Toxicity Dynamics on Generalist Voat Communities
- Authors: Aleksandar Tomašević, Ana Vranić, Aleksandra Alorić, Marija Mitrović Dankulov,
- Abstract summary: Deplatforming, the permanent banning of entire communities, is a primary tool for content moderation on mainstream platforms.<n>We analyze four major Reddit ban waves (2015--2020) and their effects on generalist communities on Voat.
- Score: 73.88859384645264
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Deplatforming, the permanent banning of entire communities, is a primary tool for content moderation on mainstream platforms. While prior research examines effects on banned communities or source platform health, the impact on alternative platforms that absorb displaced users remains understudied. We analyze four major Reddit ban waves (2015--2020) and their effects on generalist communities on Voat, asking how post-ban arrivals reshape community structure and through what mechanisms transformation occurs. Combining network analysis, toxicity detection, and dynamic reputation modeling, we identify two distinct regimes of migration impact: (1) Hostile Takeover (2015--2018), where post-ban arrival cohorts formed parallel social structures that bypassed existing community cores through sheer volume, and (2) Toxic Equilibrium (2018--2020), where the flattening of existing user hierarchy enabled newcomers to integrate into the now-dominant toxic community. Crucially, community transformation occurred through peripheral dynamics rather than hub capture: fewer than 5% of newcomers achieved central positions in most months, yet toxicity doubled. Migration structure also shaped outcomes: loosely organized communities dispersed into generalist spaces, while ideologically cohesive groups concentrated in dedicated enclaves. These findings suggest that receiving platforms face a narrow intervention window during the hostile takeover phase, after which toxic norms become self-sustaining.
Related papers
- AI Didn't Start the Fire: Examining the Stack Exchange Moderator and Contributor Strike [6.538542549579634]
We investigate a conflict between the Stack Exchange platform and community that occurred in 2023 around an emergency arising from the release of large language models (LLMs)<n>We show how the 2023 conflict was preceded by a long-term deterioration in the community-platform relationship driven in particular by the platform's disregard for the community's highly-valued participatory role in governance.<n>We recommend ways that platforms and communities can institute participatory governance to be durable and effective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-09T18:19:42Z) - Community Moderation and the New Epistemology of Fact Checking on Social Media [124.26693978503339]
Social media platforms have traditionally relied on independent fact-checking organizations to identify and flag misleading content.<n>X (formerly Twitter) and Meta have shifted towards community-driven content moderation by launching their own versions of crowd-sourced fact-checking.<n>We examine the current approaches to misinformation detection across major platforms, explore the emerging role of community-driven moderation, and critically evaluate both the promises and challenges of crowd-checking at scale.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T14:50:18Z) - Ideological Fragmentation of the Social Media Ecosystem: From echo chambers to echo platforms [39.58317527488534]
We analyze 117 million posts related to the 2020 US Presidential elections from nine social media platforms.<n>Our findings reveal significant differences among platforms in their centrality within the ecosystem.<n>These results highlight the key dimensions shaping the fragmentation and polarization of the social media landscape.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-25T18:45:03Z) - Understanding Online Migration Decisions Following the Banning of
Radical Communities [0.2752817022620644]
We study how factors associated with the RECRO radicalization framework relate to users' migration decisions.
Our results show that individual-level factors, those relating to the behavior of users, are associated with the decision to post on the fringe platform.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-09T10:43:15Z) - Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers
and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years.
We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z) - Spillover of Antisocial Behavior from Fringe Platforms: The Unintended
Consequences of Community Banning [0.2752817022620644]
We show that participating in fringe communities on Reddit increases users' toxicity and involvement with subreddits similar to the banned community.
In short, we find evidence for a spillover of antisocial behavior from fringe platforms onto Reddit via co-participation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-20T15:48:27Z) - This Must Be the Place: Predicting Engagement of Online Communities in a
Large-scale Distributed Campaign [70.69387048368849]
We study the behavior of communities with millions of active members.
We develop a hybrid model, combining textual cues, community meta-data, and structural properties.
We demonstrate the applicability of our model through Reddit's r/place a large-scale online experiment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-14T08:23:16Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Community evolution in retweet networks [0.45880283710344055]
We propose an approach that tracks two aspects of community evolution in retweet networks: flow of the members in, out and between the communities, and their influence.
For community detection, we propose a two-stage approach. In the first stage, we apply an enhanced Louvain algorithm, called Ensemble Louvain, to find stable communities.
For the detected communities, we compute internal and external influence, and for individual users, the retweet h-index influence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-13T12:08:28Z) - Do Platform Migrations Compromise Content Moderation? Evidence from
r/The_Donald and r/Incels [20.41491269475746]
We report the results of a large-scale observational study of how problematic online communities progress following community-level moderation measures.
Our results suggest that, in both cases, moderation measures significantly decreased posting activity on the new platform.
In spite of that, users in one of the studied communities showed increases in signals associated with toxicity and radicalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T16:03:06Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.