Enhancing Radiology Report Generation and Visual Grounding using Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10691v1
• Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 14:36:14 GMT
• Title: Enhancing Radiology Report Generation and Visual Grounding using Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Benjamin Gundersen, Nicolas Deperrois, Samuel Ruiperez-Campillo, Thomas M. Sutter, Julia E. Vogt, Michael Moor, Farhad Nooralahzadeh, Michael Krauthammer,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning can incorporate task-specific feedback, and its combination with explicit intermediate reasoning ("thinking") has demonstrated substantial gains on verifiable math and coding tasks.<n>We build an updated vision-language model based on Qwen3-VL, followed by a cold-start SFT stage that equips the model with basic thinking ability.<n>We find that while strong SFT remains crucial for high base performance, RL provides additional gains on both tasks, whereas explicit thinking does not appear to further improve results.
• Score: 15.894854593567963
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have improved Chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation in multiple aspects. However, many medical VLMs rely solely on supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which optimizes next-token prediction without evaluating answer quality. In contrast, reinforcement learning (RL) can incorporate task-specific feedback, and its combination with explicit intermediate reasoning ("thinking") has demonstrated substantial gains on verifiable math and coding tasks. To investigate the effects of RL and thinking in a CXR VLM, we perform large-scale SFT on CXR data to build an updated RadVLM based on Qwen3-VL, followed by a cold-start SFT stage that equips the model with basic thinking ability. We then apply Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with clinically grounded, task-specific rewards for report generation and visual grounding, and run matched RL experiments on both domain-specific and general-domain Qwen3-VL variants, with and without thinking. Across these settings, we find that while strong SFT remains crucial for high base performance, RL provides additional gains on both tasks, whereas explicit thinking does not appear to further improve results. Under a unified evaluation pipeline, the RL-optimized RadVLM models outperform their baseline counterparts and reach state-of-the-art performance on both report generation and grounding, highlighting clinically aligned RL as a powerful complement to SFT for medical VLMs.

Related papers

• When Does RL Help Medical VLMs? Disentangling Vision, SFT, and RL Gains [1.9256950761509062]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) is increasingly used to post-train medical Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>It remains unclear whether RL improves medical visual reasoning or mainly sharpens behaviors already induced by supervised fine-tuning (SFT)<n>We present a controlled study that disentangles these effects along three axes: vision, SFT, and RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T22:16:19Z)
• More Than the Final Answer: Improving Visual Extraction and Logical Consistency in Vision-Language Models [74.10138874771852]
  We propose PeRL-VL (Perception and Reasoning Learning for Vision-Language Models), a decoupled framework that separately improves visual perception and textual reasoning on top of RLVR.<n>For perception, PeRL-VL introduces a VLM-based description reward that scores the model's self-generated image descriptions for faithfulness and sufficiency.<n>For reasoning, PeRL-VL adds a text-only Reasoning SFT stage on logic-rich chain-of-thought data, enhancing coherence and logical consistency independently of vision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-13T23:06:18Z)
• Long Grounded Thoughts: Distilling Compositional Visual Reasoning Chains at Scale [70.23466957404891]
  We introduce a new reasoning data generation framework spanning diverse skills and levels of complexity with over 1M high-quality synthetic vision-centric questions.<n>We show that finetuning Qwen2.5-VL-7B on our data outperforms all open-data baselines across all evaluated vision-centric benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T20:50:54Z)
• Reinforcement Learning on Pre-Training Data [55.570379963147424]
  We introduce Reinforcement Learning on Pre-Training data (R), a new training-time scaling paradigm for optimizing large language models (LLMs)<n>R enables the policy to autonomously explore meaningful trajectories to learn from pre-training data and improve its capability through reinforcement learning (RL)<n>Extensive experiments on both general-domain and mathematical reasoning benchmarks across multiple models validate the effectiveness of R.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T17:10:40Z)
• RL-PLUS: Countering Capability Boundary Collapse of LLMs in Reinforcement Learning with Hybrid-policy Optimization [111.1749164063616]
  We propose RL-PLUS, a novel hybrid-policy optimization approach for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n> RL-PLUS synergizes internal exploitation with external data to achieve stronger reasoning capabilities and surpass the boundaries of base models.<n>We provide both theoretical analysis and extensive experiments to demonstrate the superiority and generalizability of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T23:55:29Z)
• RARL: Improving Medical VLM Reasoning and Generalization with Reinforcement Learning and LoRA under Data and Hardware Constraints [0.0]
  Reasoning-Aware Reinforcement Learning framework enhances the reasoning capabilities of medical vision-language models.<n>Our approach fine-tunes a lightweight base model, Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct, using Low-Rank Adaptation and custom reward functions.<n> Experimental results show RARL significantly improves VLM performance in medical image analysis and clinical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-07T00:26:23Z)
• SFT or RL? An Early Investigation into Training R1-Like Reasoning Large Vision-Language Models [39.551767637896404]
  This work revisits the dominant supervised fine-tuning (SFT) then reinforcement learning (RL) paradigm for training Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>We show that SFT can significantly undermine subsequent RL by inducing pseudo reasoning paths'' imitated from expert models.<n>We introduce VLAA-Thinking, a new multimodal dataset designed to support reasoning in LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:54:05Z)
• Rethinking RL Scaling for Vision Language Models: A Transparent, From-Scratch Framework and Comprehensive Evaluation Scheme [36.34443944082215]
  This work introduces a transparent, from-scratch framework forReinforcement learning (RL) in vision-based models (VLMs)<n>It offers a minimal yet functional four-step pipeline validated across multiple models and datasets.<n>In addition, a standardized evaluation scheme is proposed to assess training dynamics and reflective behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T13:53:28Z)
• Exploring the Effect of Reinforcement Learning on Video Understanding: Insights from SEED-Bench-R1 [53.894789613838654]
  We introduce SEED-Bench-R1, a benchmark designed to evaluate post-training methods for MLLMs in video understanding.<n>It includes intricate real-world videos and complex everyday planning tasks in the format of multiple-choice questions.<n>Using Qwen2-VL-Instruct-7B as a base model, we compare RL with supervised fine-tuning (SFT)<n>Our detailed analysis reveals that RL enhances visual perception but often produces less coherent reasoning chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T17:55:23Z)
• OpenVLThinker: Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative SFT-RL Cycles [91.88062410741833]
  We introduce OpenVLThinker, one of the first open-source large vision-language models (LVLMs) to exhibit sophisticated chain-of-thought reasoning.<n>We show that OpenVLThinker-7B consistently advances performance across six benchmarks demanding mathematical and general reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:52:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.