Limits and Gains of Test-Time Scaling in Vision-Language Reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11109v1
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:48:54 GMT
- Title: Limits and Gains of Test-Time Scaling in Vision-Language Reasoning
- Authors: Mohammadjavad Ahmadpour, Amirmahdi Meighani, Payam Taebi, Omid Ghahroodi, Amirmohammad Izadi, Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah,
- Abstract summary: Test-time scaling (TTS) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving the reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) by allocating additional computation at inference.<n>We present a systematic empirical study of inference time reasoning methods applied across both open-source and closed-source Vision-Language Models (VLMs) on different benchmarks.
- Score: 8.76012279865596
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Test-time scaling (TTS) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving the reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) by allocating additional computation at inference, yet its application to multimodal systems such as Vision-Language Models (VLMs) remains underexplored. In this work, we present a systematic empirical study of inference time reasoning methods applied across both open-source and closed-source VLMs on different benchmarks. Our results reveal that while closed-source models consistently benefit from structured reasoning and iterative Self-Refinement, open-source VLMs show inconsistent behavior: external verification provides the most reliable gains, whereas iterative refinement often degrades performance. We further find that the effectiveness of TTS is dataset-dependent, yielding clear improvements on multi-step reasoning tasks but offering only limited gains on perception-focused benchmarks. These findings demonstrate that TTS is not a universal solution and must be tailored to both model capabilities and task characteristics, motivating future work on adaptive TTS strategies and multimodal reward models.
Related papers
- Leveraging LLM Parametric Knowledge for Fact Checking without Retrieval [60.25608870901428]
Trustworthiness is a core research challenge for agentic AI systems built on Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose the task of fact-checking without retrieval, focusing on the verification of arbitrary natural language claims, independent of their source robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-05T18:42:51Z) - UniT: Unified Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Test-time Scaling [85.590774707406]
Unified models can handle both multimodal understanding and generation within a single architecture, yet they typically operate in a single pass without iteratively refining their outputs.<n>We introduce UniT, a framework for multimodal test-time scaling that enables a single unified model to reason, verify, and refine across multiple rounds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T18:59:49Z) - Boosting Multi-modal Keyphrase Prediction with Dynamic Chain-of-Thought in Vision-Language Models [28.416254061159176]
Multi-modal keyphrase prediction (MMKP) aims to advance beyond text-only methods.<n>Traditional multi-modal approaches have been proven to have significant limitations in handling the challenging absence and unseen scenarios.<n>We propose leveraging vision-language models (VLMs) for the MMKP task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T13:13:07Z) - Test-Time Scaling of Reasoning Models for Machine Translation [16.317481079574065]
Test-time scaling (TTS) has enhanced the performance of Reasoning Models (RMs) on various tasks such as math and coding.<n>This paper investigates whether increased inference-time computation improves translation quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-07T21:15:18Z) - Specialization after Generalization: Towards Understanding Test-Time Training in Foundation Models [64.02612380298228]
Recent studies have explored the idea of continuing to train a model at test-time for a given task, known as test-time training (TTT)<n>We propose a model in which TTT achieves a substantially smaller in-distribution test error than global training.<n>We empirically validate our model's key assumptions by training a sparse autoencoder on ImageNet.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T09:24:52Z) - Scale, Don't Fine-tune: Guiding Multimodal LLMs for Efficient Visual Place Recognition at Test-Time [12.659582318581606]
Current approaches, including Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), enhance semantic understanding but suffer from high computational overhead and limited cross-domain transferability when fine-tuned.<n>We propose a novel framework employing Test-Time Scaling (TTS) that leverages vision-language alignment capabilities through Guidance-based methods for direct similarity scoring.<n>Our approach eliminates two-stage processing by employing structured prompts that generate length-controllable scoring outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-02T09:25:13Z) - Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute [61.00662702026523]
We propose a unified Test-Time Compute scaling framework that leverages increased inference-time instead of larger models.<n>Our framework incorporates two complementary strategies: internal TTC and external TTC.<n>We demonstrate our textbf32B model achieves a 46% issue resolution rate, surpassing significantly larger models such as DeepSeek R1 671B and OpenAI o1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-31T07:31:32Z) - OpenVLThinker: Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative SFT-RL Cycles [91.88062410741833]
We introduce OpenVLThinker, one of the first open-source large vision-language models (LVLMs) to exhibit sophisticated chain-of-thought reasoning.<n>We show that OpenVLThinker-7B consistently advances performance across six benchmarks demanding mathematical and general reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-21T17:52:43Z) - FACT-AUDIT: An Adaptive Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic Fact-Checking Evaluation of Large Language Models [79.41859481668618]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the fact-checking studies.<n>Existing automated fact-checking evaluation methods rely on static datasets and classification metrics.<n>We introduce FACT-AUDIT, an agent-driven framework that adaptively and dynamically assesses LLMs' fact-checking capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T07:44:22Z) - RaCT: Ranking-aware Chain-of-Thought Optimization for LLMs [30.216174551427443]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in text reranking tasks.<n> conventional supervised fine-tuning approaches for specializing LLMs in ranking tasks often lead to significant degradation of the models' general-purpose abilities.<n>This paper presents a novel methodology that strategically combines Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting techniques with an innovative two-stage training pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-18T23:24:15Z) - Making Long-Context Language Models Better Multi-Hop Reasoners [42.09676404515287]
We introduce Reasoning with Attributions, a novel approach that prompts LMs to supply attributions for each assertion during their reasoning.
We validate our approach through experiments on three multi-hop datasets, employing both proprietary and open-source models.
Our model achieves competitive performance on multi-hop reasoning benchmarks, closely paralleling proprietary LMs such as ChatGPT and Claude-instant.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-06T15:06:40Z) - Spurious Feature Eraser: Stabilizing Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Foundation Model [86.9619638550683]
Vision-language foundation models have exhibited remarkable success across a multitude of downstream tasks due to their scalability on extensive image-text paired data.<n>However, these models display significant limitations when applied to downstream tasks, such as fine-grained image classification, as a result of decision shortcuts''
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-01T09:01:53Z) - Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A
Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text.
Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.