Totalitarian Technics: The Hidden Cost of AI Scribes in Healthcare

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11814v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 18:43:04 GMT
• Title: Totalitarian Technics: The Hidden Cost of AI Scribes in Healthcare
• Authors: Hugh Brosnahan,
• Abstract summary: AI scribes are systems that record and summarise patient-clinician interactions.<n>This paper argues that their significance lies in how they reshape medical attention itself.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) scribes, systems that record and summarise patient-clinician interactions, are promoted as solutions to administrative overload. This paper argues that their significance lies not in efficiency gains but in how they reshape medical attention itself. Offering a conceptual analysis, it situates AI scribes within a broader philosophical lineage concerned with the externalisation of human thought and skill. Drawing on Iain McGilchrist's hemisphere theory and Lewis Mumford's philosophy of technics, the paper examines how technology embodies and amplifies a particular mode of attention. AI scribes, it contends, exemplify the dominance of a left-hemispheric, calculative mindset that privileges the measurable and procedural over the intuitive and relational. As this mode of attention becomes further embedded in medical practice, it risks narrowing the field of care, eroding clinical expertise, and reducing physicians to operators within an increasingly mechanised system.

Related papers

• Explainable AI as a Double-Edged Sword in Dermatology: The Impact on Clinicians versus The Public [46.86429592892395]
  explainable AI (XAI) addresses this by providing AI decision-making insight.<n>We present results from two large-scale experiments combining a fairness-based diagnosis AI model and different XAI explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T00:06:06Z)
• Beyond Black-Box AI: Interpretable Hybrid Systems for Dementia Care [2.4339626079536925]
  The recent boom of large language models (LLMs) has re-ignited the hope that artificial intelligence (AI) systems could aid medical diagnosis.<n>Despite dazzling benchmark scores, LLM assistants have yet to deliver measurable improvements at the bedside.<n>This scoping review aims to highlight the areas where AI is limited to make practical contributions in the clinical setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T01:43:06Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Medical Applications: A Review [42.33274794442013]
  This article reviews recent research grounded in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)<n>It focuses on medical practices within the visual, audio, and multimodal perspectives.<n>We endeavour to categorise and synthesise these practices, aiming to provide support and guidance for future researchers and healthcare professionals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T11:31:06Z)
• The Dual Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Balancing Advancements with Ethical and Operational Challenges [1.3302498881305604]
  This paper takes a close look at how AI is transforming areas such as diagnostics, precision medicine, and drug discovery.<n>Issues like patient privacy, safety, and the fairness of AI decisions are explored to understand whether AI in healthcare is a positive force, a potential risk, or perhaps both.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T23:36:16Z)
• Emotional Intelligence Through Artificial Intelligence : NLP and Deep Learning in the Analysis of Healthcare Texts [1.9374282535132377]
  This manuscript presents a methodical examination of the utilization of Artificial Intelligence in the assessment of emotions in texts related to healthcare. We scrutinize numerous research studies that employ AI to augment sentiment analysis, categorize emotions, and forecast patient outcomes. There persist challenges, which encompass ensuring the ethical application of AI, safeguarding patient confidentiality, and addressing potential biases in algorithmic procedures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T15:58:13Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
• What Do End-Users Really Want? Investigation of Human-Centered XAI for Mobile Health Apps [69.53730499849023]
  We present a user-centered persona concept to evaluate explainable AI (XAI) Results show that users' demographics and personality, as well as the type of explanation, impact explanation preferences. Our insights bring an interactive, human-centered XAI closer to practical application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T12:51:27Z)
• Towards the Use of Saliency Maps for Explaining Low-Quality Electrocardiograms to End Users [51.644376281196394]
  When using medical images for diagnosis, it is important that the images are of high quality.<n>In telemedicine, a common problem is that the quality issue is only flagged once the patient has left the clinic, meaning they must return in order to have the exam redone.<n>This paper reports on the development of an AI system for flagging and explaining low-quality medical images in real-time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-06T14:53:26Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Explainable AI meets Healthcare: A Study on Heart Disease Dataset [0.0]
  The aim is to enlighten practitioners on the understandability and interpretability of explainable AI systems using a variety of techniques. Our paper contains examples based on the heart disease dataset and elucidates on how the explainability techniques should be preferred to create trustworthiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-06T05:18:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.