Expert Assessment: The Systemic Environmental Risks of Artficial Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11863v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2025 10:15:06 GMT
• Title: Expert Assessment: The Systemic Environmental Risks of Artficial Intelligence
• Abstract summary: Systemic environmental risks of AI are emergent, cross-sector harms to climate, biodiversity, freshwater, and broader socioecological systems.<n>We propose a three-level framework that operationalizes systemic risk analysis.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is often presented as a key tool for addressing societal challenges, such as climate change. At the same time, AI's environmental footprint is expanding increasingly. This report describes the systemic environmental risks of artificial intelligence, in particular, moving beyond direct impacts such as energy and water usage. Systemic environmental risks of AI are emergent, cross-sector harms to climate, biodiversity, freshwater, and broader socioecological systems that arise primarily from AI's integration into social, economic, and physical infrastructures, rather than its direct resource use, and that propagate through feedbacks, yielding nonlinear, inequitable, and potentially irreversible impacts. While these risks are emergent and quantification is uncertain, this report aims to provide an overview of systemic environmental risks. Drawing on a narrative literature review, we propose a three-level framework that operationalizes systemic risk analysis. The framework identifies the structural conditions that shape AI development, the risk amplification mechanisms that propagate environmental harm, and the impacts that manifest as observable ecological and social consequences. We illustrate the framework in expert-interview-based case studies across agriculture and biodiversity, oil and gas, and waste management.

Related papers

• An approach to systemic risks of AI through the lens of emergence, collective action problems, and externalities [41.99844472131922]
  There is no generally accepted definition of systemic risks in general and for AI in particular.<n>The application of the systemic risk approach to human rights or fundamental rights, like in the EU AI Act, is relatively new.<n>We argue that some concepts so far have not sufficiently take complexity and emergence into account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T17:12:04Z)
• AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
  This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
• AI and Remote Sensing for Resilient and Sustainable Built Environments: A Review of Current Methods, Open Data and Future Directions [0.0]
  Critical infrastructure, such as transport networks, underpins economic growth by enabling mobility and trade.<n>Climate change impacts, extreme weather, rising sea levels, and hybrid threats pose growing risks to their resilience and functionality.<n>This review paper explores how emerging digital technologies, specifically Artificial Intelligence (AI), can enhance damage assessment and monitoring of transport infrastructure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T09:59:23Z)
• AI-based Approach in Early Warning Systems: Focus on Emergency Communication Ecosystem and Citizen Participation in Nordic Countries [0.7373617024876725]
  The chapter advocates a holistic approach, distinguishing preparedness, emergency responses, and postcrisis phases.<n>The role of the Early Warning System (EWS), Risk modeling and mitigation measures are particularly emphasized.<n>Case studies from Nordic countries have been highlighted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T12:32:16Z)
• Open and Sustainable AI: challenges, opportunities and the road ahead in the life sciences (October 2025 -- Version 2) [49.142289900583705]
  We review the increased erosion of trust in AI research outputs, driven by the issues of poor reusability.<n>We discuss the fragmented components of the AI ecosystem and lack of guiding pathways to best support Open and Sustainable AI.<n>Our work connects researchers with relevant AI resources, facilitating the implementation of sustainable, reusable and transparent AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T12:52:34Z)
• Adapting Probabilistic Risk Assessment for AI [0.0]
  General-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) systems present an urgent risk management challenge.<n>Current methods often rely on selective testing and undocumented assumptions about risk priorities.<n>This paper introduces the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) for AI framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T17:59:14Z)
• From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate [69.05573887799203]
  We argue that understanding these second-order impacts requires an interdisciplinary approach, combining lifecycle assessments with socio-economic analyses.<n>We contend that a narrow focus on direct emissions misrepresents AI's true climate footprint, limiting the scope for meaningful interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T22:45:06Z)
• A Taxonomy of Systemic Risks from General-Purpose AI [2.5956465292067867]
  We consider systemic risks as large-scale threats that can affect entire societies or economies.<n>Key sources of systemic risk emerge from knowledge gaps, challenges in recognizing harm, and the unpredictable trajectory of AI development.<n>This paper contributes to AI safety research by providing a structured groundwork for understanding and addressing the potential large-scale negative societal impacts of general-purpose AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-24T22:16:18Z)
• Transforming disaster risk reduction with AI and big data: Legal and interdisciplinary perspectives [4.007465634200105]
  Discussing how AI influences legal frameworks and environmental management. Examines how legal and environmental considerations can confine AI within the socioeconomic domain. Offers blueprint for interdisciplinary collaboration to create adaptive law systems based on AI integration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T16:08:34Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction.<n>Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results.<n>However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges.<n>This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Risks of AI Scientists: Prioritizing Safeguarding Over Autonomy [65.77763092833348]
  This perspective examines vulnerabilities in AI scientists, shedding light on potential risks associated with their misuse.<n>We take into account user intent, the specific scientific domain, and their potential impact on the external environment.<n>We propose a triadic framework involving human regulation, agent alignment, and an understanding of environmental feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T18:54:07Z)
• Control Risk for Potential Misuse of Artificial Intelligence in Science [85.91232985405554]
  We aim to raise awareness of the dangers of AI misuse in science. We highlight real-world examples of misuse in chemical science. We propose a system called SciGuard to control misuse risks for AI models in science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T18:50:57Z)
• Predictable Artificial Intelligence [77.1127726638209]
  This paper introduces the ideas and challenges of Predictable AI.<n>It explores the ways in which we can anticipate key validity indicators of present and future AI ecosystems.<n>We argue that achieving predictability is crucial for fostering trust, liability, control, alignment and safety of AI ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T21:36:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.