Transforming disaster risk reduction with AI and big data: Legal and interdisciplinary perspectives
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07123v1
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:08:34 GMT
- Title: Transforming disaster risk reduction with AI and big data: Legal and interdisciplinary perspectives
- Authors: Kwok P Chun, Thanti Octavianti, Nilay Dogulu, Hristos Tyralis, Georgia Papacharalampous, Ryan Rowberry, Pingyu Fan, Mark Everard, Maria Francesch-Huidobro, Wellington Migliari, David M. Hannah, John Travis Marshall, Rafael Tolosana Calasanz, Chad Staddon, Ida Ansharyani, Bastien Dieppois, Todd R Lewis, Juli Ponce, Silvia Ibrean, Tiago Miguel Ferreira, Chinkie Peliño-Golle, Ye Mu, Manuel Delgado, Elizabeth Silvestre Espinoza, Martin Keulertz, Deepak Gopinath, Cheng Li,
- Abstract summary: Discussing how AI influences legal frameworks and environmental management.
Examines how legal and environmental considerations can confine AI within the socioeconomic domain.
Offers blueprint for interdisciplinary collaboration to create adaptive law systems based on AI integration.
- Score: 4.007465634200105
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Managing complex disaster risks requires interdisciplinary efforts. Breaking down silos between law, social sciences, and natural sciences is critical for all processes of disaster risk reduction. This enables adaptive systems for the rapid evolution of AI technology, which has significantly impacted the intersection of law and natural environments. Exploring how AI influences legal frameworks and environmental management, while also examining how legal and environmental considerations can confine AI within the socioeconomic domain, is essential. From a co-production review perspective, drawing on insights from lawyers, social scientists, and environmental scientists, principles for responsible data mining are proposed based on safety, transparency, fairness, accountability, and contestability. This discussion offers a blueprint for interdisciplinary collaboration to create adaptive law systems based on AI integration of knowledge from environmental and social sciences. Discrepancies in the use of language between environmental scientists and decision-makers in terms of usefulness and accuracy hamper how AI can be used based on the principles of legal considerations for a safe, trustworthy, and contestable disaster management framework. When social networks are useful for mitigating disaster risks based on AI, the legal implications related to privacy and liability of the outcomes of disaster management must be considered. Fair and accountable principles emphasise environmental considerations and foster socioeconomic discussions related to public engagement. AI also has an important role to play in education, bringing together the next generations of law, social sciences, and natural sciences to work on interdisciplinary solutions in harmony.
Related papers
- The overlooked need for Ethics in Complexity Science: Why it matters [0.0]
We highlight the critical absence of formal guidelines, dedicated ethical committees, and widespread discussions on ethics within the complexity science community.
Our recommendations include (i) initiating supportive mechanisms to develop ethical guidelines specific to complex systems research, (ii) creating open-access resources, and (iii) fostering inclusive dialogues.
By initiating this dialogue, we aim to encourage a necessary shift in how ethics is integrated into complexity research, positioning the field to address contemporary challenges more effectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-03T15:48:24Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - Control Risk for Potential Misuse of Artificial Intelligence in Science [85.91232985405554]
We aim to raise awareness of the dangers of AI misuse in science.
We highlight real-world examples of misuse in chemical science.
We propose a system called SciGuard to control misuse risks for AI models in science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-11T18:50:57Z) - Survey on AI Ethics: A Socio-technical Perspective [0.9374652839580183]
Ethical concerns associated with AI are multifaceted, including challenging issues of fairness, privacy and data protection, responsibility and accountability, safety and robustness, transparency and explainability, and environmental impact.
This work unifies the current and future ethical concerns of deploying AI into society.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-28T21:00:56Z) - Report of the 1st Workshop on Generative AI and Law [78.62063815165968]
This report presents the takeaways of the inaugural Workshop on Generative AI and Law (GenLaw)
A cross-disciplinary group of practitioners and scholars from computer science and law convened to discuss the technical, doctrinal, and policy challenges presented by law for Generative AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-11T04:13:37Z) - A Review of the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and its Applications
in the United States [0.0]
The paper highlights the impact AI has in every sector of the US economy and the resultant effect on entities spanning businesses, government, academia, and civil society.
Our discussion explores eleven fundamental 'ethical principles' structured as overarching themes.
These encompass Transparency, Justice, Fairness, Equity, Non- Maleficence, Responsibility, Accountability, Privacy, Beneficence, Freedom, Autonomy, Trust, Dignity, Sustainability, and Solidarity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T14:29:00Z) - Regulation and NLP (RegNLP): Taming Large Language Models [51.41095330188972]
We argue how NLP research can benefit from proximity to regulatory studies and adjacent fields.
We advocate for the development of a new multidisciplinary research space on regulation and NLP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T09:22:40Z) - Are You Worthy of My Trust?: A Socioethical Perspective on the Impacts
of Trustworthy AI Systems on the Environment and Human Society [0.47138177023764666]
We offer a brief, high-level overview of societal impacts of AI systems.
We highlight the requirement of multi-disciplinary governance and convergence throughout its lifecycle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-18T03:07:47Z) - Applications and Societal Implications of Artificial Intelligence in
Manufacturing: A Systematic Review [0.3867363075280544]
The study finds that there is a predominantly optimistic outlook in prior literature regarding AI's impact on firms.
The paper draws analogies to historical cases and other examples to provide a contextual perspective on potential societal effects of industrial AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-25T07:17:37Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Hacia los Comit\'es de \'Etica en Inteligencia Artificial [68.8204255655161]
It is priority to create the rules and specialized organizations that can oversight the following of such rules.
This work proposes the creation, at the universities, of Ethical Committees or Commissions specialized on Artificial Intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-11T23:48:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.