On the Dangers of Bootstrapping Generation for Continual Learning and Beyond

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11867v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2025 15:16:30 GMT
• Title: On the Dangers of Bootstrapping Generation for Continual Learning and Beyond
• Authors: Daniil Zverev, A. Sophia Koepke, Joao F. Henriques,
• Abstract summary: We present a statistical analysis showing that synthetic data introduces significant bias and variance into training objectives.<n>We quantify this degradation and show that state-of-the-art GER methods fail to maintain alignment in the latent space.
• Score: 8.530455607001828
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The use of synthetically generated data for training models is becoming a common practice. While generated data can augment the training data, repeated training on synthetic data raises concerns about distribution drift and degradation of performance due to contamination of the dataset. We investigate the consequences of this bootstrapping process through the lens of continual learning, drawing a connection to Generative Experience Replay (GER) methods. We present a statistical analysis showing that synthetic data introduces significant bias and variance into training objectives, weakening the reliability of maximum likelihood estimation. We provide empirical evidence showing that popular generative models collapse under repeated training with synthetic data. We quantify this degradation and show that state-of-the-art GER methods fail to maintain alignment in the latent space. Our findings raise critical concerns about the use of synthetic data in continual learning.

Related papers

• Improving the Generation and Evaluation of Synthetic Data for Downstream Medical Causal Inference [89.5628648718851]
  Causal inference is essential for developing and evaluating medical interventions.<n>Real-world medical datasets are often difficult to access due to regulatory barriers.<n>We present STEAM: a novel method for generating Synthetic data for Treatment Effect Analysis in Medicine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T16:16:00Z)
• Escaping Model Collapse via Synthetic Data Verification: Near-term Improvements and Long-term Convergence [31.751930228965467]
  We investigate ways to modify this synthetic retraining process to avoid model collapse.<n>Our key finding is that by injecting information through an external synthetic data verifier, synthetic retraining will not cause model collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-18T22:39:39Z)
• ForTIFAI: Fending Off Recursive Training Induced Failure for AI Model Collapse [13.096745830570944]
  We introduce the Truncated-Cross-Entropy (TCE) loss function to mitigate model collapse in synthetic data.<n>TCE mitigates collapse by selectively ignoring high-confidence tokens during training, effectively filtering out likely machine-generated artifacts.<n>Our results demonstrate that confidence-aware training objectives can substantially delay collapse onset, offering a practical and generalizable tool for model robustness under synthetic-data exposure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T20:06:51Z)
• Valid Inference with Imperfect Synthetic Data [39.10587411316875]
  We introduce a new estimator based on generalized method of moments.<n>We find that interactions between the moment residuals of synthetic data and those of real data can greatly improve estimates of the target parameter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T18:32:52Z)
• AdvKT: An Adversarial Multi-Step Training Framework for Knowledge Tracing [64.79967583649407]
  Knowledge Tracing (KT) monitors students' knowledge states and simulates their responses to question sequences.<n>Existing KT models typically follow a single-step training paradigm, which leads to significant error accumulation.<n>We propose a novel Adversarial Multi-Step Training Framework for Knowledge Tracing (AdvKT) which focuses on the multi-step KT task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:31:57Z)
• A Theoretical Perspective: How to Prevent Model Collapse in Self-consuming Training Loops [55.07063067759609]
  High-quality data is essential for training large generative models, yet the vast reservoir of real data available online has become nearly depleted.<n>Models increasingly generate their own data for further training, forming Self-consuming Training Loops (STLs)<n>Some models degrade or even collapse, while others successfully avoid these failures, leaving a significant gap in theoretical understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T06:18:13Z)
• Collapse or Thrive? Perils and Promises of Synthetic Data in a Self-Generating World [19.266191284270793]
  generative machine learning models are pretrained on web-scale datasets containing data generated by earlier models.<n>Some prior work warns of "model collapse" as the web is overwhelmed by synthetic data.<n>We report experiments on three ways of using data (training-workflows) across three generative model task-settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T05:49:24Z)
• Synthetic Image Learning: Preserving Performance and Preventing Membership Inference Attacks [5.0243930429558885]
  This paper introduces Knowledge Recycling (KR), a pipeline designed to optimise the generation and use of synthetic data for training downstream classifiers. At the heart of this pipeline is Generative Knowledge Distillation (GKD), the proposed technique that significantly improves the quality and usefulness of the information. The results show a significant reduction in the performance gap between models trained on real and synthetic data, with models based on synthetic data outperforming those trained on real data in some cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T10:31:07Z)
• Unveiling the Flaws: Exploring Imperfections in Synthetic Data and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models [89.88010750772413]
  Synthetic data has been proposed as a solution to address the issue of high-quality data scarcity in the training of large language models (LLMs) Our work delves into these specific flaws associated with question-answer (Q-A) pairs, a prevalent type of synthetic data, and presents a method based on unlearning techniques to mitigate these flaws. Our work has yielded key insights into the effective use of synthetic data, aiming to promote more robust and efficient LLM training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T08:38:59Z)
• Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Models [56.84592466204185]
  This paper tackles the emerging challenge of training generative models within a self-consuming loop. We construct a theoretical framework to rigorously evaluate how this training procedure impacts the data distributions learned by future models. We present results for kernel density estimation, delivering nuanced insights such as the impact of mixed data training on error propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T02:08:09Z)
• Reimagining Synthetic Tabular Data Generation through Data-Centric AI: A Comprehensive Benchmark [56.8042116967334]
  Synthetic data serves as an alternative in training machine learning models. ensuring that synthetic data mirrors the complex nuances of real-world data is a challenging task. This paper explores the potential of integrating data-centric AI techniques to guide the synthetic data generation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T20:32:02Z)
• On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Data [56.153542044045224]
  We study the impact of training generative models on mixed datasets. We first prove the stability of iterative training under the condition that the initial generative models approximate the data distribution well enough. We empirically validate our theory on both synthetic and natural images by iteratively training normalizing flows and state-of-the-art diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T16:41:04Z)
• From Fake to Real: Pretraining on Balanced Synthetic Images to Prevent Spurious Correlations in Image Recognition [64.59093444558549]
  We propose a simple, easy-to-implement, two-step training pipeline that we call From Fake to Real. By training on real and synthetic data separately, FFR does not expose the model to the statistical differences between real and synthetic data. Our experiments show that FFR improves worst group accuracy over the state-of-the-art by up to 20% over three datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T19:52:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.