Beyond right or wrong : towards redefining adaptive learning indicators in virtual learning environments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12105v1
• Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 00:36:45 GMT
• Title: Beyond right or wrong : towards redefining adaptive learning indicators in virtual learning environments
• Authors: Andreia dos Santos Sachete, Alba Valeria de SantAnna de Freitas Loiola, Fabio Diniz Rossi, Jose Valdeni de Lima, Raquel Salcedo Gomes,
• Abstract summary: The objective of this work is to elucidate which learning indicators influence student learning and which can be implemented in a VLE to assist in adaptive learning.<n>The works selected and filtered by qualitative assessment reveal a comprehensive approach to assessing different aspects of the learning in virtual environments.
• Score: 0.5437050212139087
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Student learning development must involve more than just correcting or incorrect questions. However, most adaptive learning methods in Virtual Learning Environments are based on whether the student's response is incorrect or correct. This perspective is limited in assessing the student's learning level, as it does not consider other elements that can be crucial in this process. The objective of this work is to conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to elucidate which learning indicators influence student learning and which can be implemented in a VLE to assist in adaptive learning. The works selected and filtered by qualitative assessment reveal a comprehensive approach to assessing different aspects of the learning in virtual environments, such as motivation, emotions, physiological responses, brain imaging, and the students' prior knowledge. The discussion of these new indicators allows adaptive technology developers to implement more appropriate solutions to students' realities, resulting in more complete training.

Related papers

• A Qualitative Study of IT Students' Skill Development: Comparing Online and Face- to-Face Learning Environments [0.3279527871567901]
  This study explores and tries to better understand, specifically the IT student's experiences and perceived skills development in online and face-to-face learning environments.<n>Data was collected through semi-structured interviews by focusing on the student and asking for their personal experience on skill development through online and face-to-face learning environments.<n>Results suggest that face-to-face learning may develop a better communication and collaborative skills more effectively while experiencing a synchronous interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T16:12:22Z)
• GuideAI: A Real-time Personalized Learning Solution with Adaptive Interventions [0.5833117322405447]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful learning tools, but they lack awareness of learners' cognitive and physiological states.<n>We introduce GuideAI, a multi-modal framework that enhances LLM-driven learning by integrating real-time biosensory feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T09:06:45Z)
• UCO: A Multi-Turn Interactive Reinforcement Learning Method for Adaptive Teaching with Large Language Models [59.693733170193944]
  Large language models (LLMs) are shifting from answer providers to intelligent tutors in educational settings.<n>Recent reinforcement learning approaches address this limitation but face two critical challenges.<n>We propose the Unidirectional Cognitive Optimization (UCO) method to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-12T01:27:02Z)
• The Imperfect Learner: Incorporating Developmental Trajectories in Memory-based Student Simulation [55.722188569369656]
  This paper introduces a novel framework for memory-based student simulation.<n>It incorporates developmental trajectories through a hierarchical memory mechanism with structured knowledge representation.<n>In practice, we implement a curriculum-aligned simulator grounded on the Next Generation Science Standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T08:05:43Z)
• Automatic Piecewise Linear Regression for Predicting Student Learning Satisfaction [0.7212939068975618]
  This study demonstrates that a model that combines boosting with interpretability, automatic piecewise linear regression offers the best fit for predicting learning satisfaction.<n>Students' time management and concentration abilities, perceived helpfulness to classmates, and participation in offline courses have the most significant positive impact on learning satisfaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-12T14:48:50Z)
• Unveiling the Learning Mind of Language Models: A Cognitive Framework and Empirical Study [45.82081693725339]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across tasks such as mathematics, coding, and reasoning.<n>Yet their learning ability, which is crucial for adapting to dynamic environments and acquiring new knowledge, remains underexplored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T13:24:50Z)
• How Good is ChatGPT in Giving Adaptive Guidance Using Knowledge Graphs in E-Learning Environments? [0.8999666725996978]
  This study introduces an approach that integrates dynamic knowledge graphs with large language models (LLMs) to offer nuanced student assistance.<n>Central to this method is the knowledge graph's role in assessing a student's comprehension of topic prerequisites.<n>Preliminary findings suggest students could benefit from this tiered support, achieving enhanced comprehension and improved task outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T04:05:43Z)
• Exploring Engagement and Perceived Learning Outcomes in an Immersive Flipped Learning Context [0.195804735329484]
  The aim of this study was to explore the benefits and challenges of the immersive flipped learning approach in relation to students' online engagement and perceived learning outcomes. The study revealed high levels of student engagement and perceived learning outcomes, although it also identified areas needing improvement. The findings of this study can serve as a valuable resource for educators seeking to design engaging and effective remote learning experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T11:38:48Z)
• The Perceived Learning Behaviors and Assessment Techniques of First-Year Students in Computer Science: An Empirical Study [0.0]
  Students believe that in-person instruction is the most effective way to learn. For evaluation methods, there is a preference for practical and written examinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T08:45:32Z)
• Toward In-Context Teaching: Adapting Examples to Students' Misconceptions [54.82965010592045]
  We introduce a suite of models and evaluation methods we call AdapT. AToM is a new probabilistic model for adaptive teaching that jointly infers students' past beliefs and optimize for the correctness of future beliefs. Our results highlight both the difficulty of the adaptive teaching task and the potential of learned adaptive models for solving it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T17:05:27Z)
• Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
  We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes. We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function. Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z)
• Resilient Constrained Learning [94.27081585149836]
  This paper presents a constrained learning approach that adapts the requirements while simultaneously solving the learning task. We call this approach resilient constrained learning after the term used to describe ecological systems that adapt to disruptions by modifying their operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T18:14:18Z)
• Dynamic Diagnosis of the Progress and Shortcomings of Student Learning using Machine Learning based on Cognitive, Social, and Emotional Features [0.06999740786886534]
  Student diversity can be challenging as it adds variability in the way in which students learn and progress over time. A single teaching approach is likely to be ineffective and result in students not meeting their potential. This paper discusses a novel methodology based on data analytics and Machine Learning to measure and causally diagnose the progress and shortcomings of student learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T21:14:58Z)
• Never Stop Learning: The Effectiveness of Fine-Tuning in Robotic Reinforcement Learning [109.77163932886413]
  We show how to adapt vision-based robotic manipulation policies to new variations by fine-tuning via off-policy reinforcement learning. This adaptation uses less than 0.2% of the data necessary to learn the task from scratch. We find that our approach of adapting pre-trained policies leads to substantial performance gains over the course of fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T17:57:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.