A Qualitative Study of IT Students' Skill Development: Comparing Online and Face- to-Face Learning Environments
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00799v1
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 16:12:22 GMT
- Title: A Qualitative Study of IT Students' Skill Development: Comparing Online and Face- to-Face Learning Environments
- Authors: Hugo Silva,
- Abstract summary: This study explores and tries to better understand, specifically the IT student's experiences and perceived skills development in online and face-to-face learning environments.<n>Data was collected through semi-structured interviews by focusing on the student and asking for their personal experience on skill development through online and face-to-face learning environments.<n>Results suggest that face-to-face learning may develop a better communication and collaborative skills more effectively while experiencing a synchronous interaction.
- Score: 0.3279527871567901
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Each student has specific characteristics and learning preferences, that reflect on each type of learning environment, online or face-to-face. Understanding these differences is crucial for educators to create learning environments that can inspire and engage students. This qualitative study explores and tries to better understand, specifically the IT student's experiences and perceived skills development in online and face-to-face learning environments, while trying to address the question: "Regarding online and face-to-face learning environments, in IT, how do students experience and assess their skill development in one learning environment compared to the other?". Using a social constructive paradigm, the purpose of the research is to focus as much as possible on the student's views of the situation and how their perspectives and experiences shape the perception of developed skills. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews by focusing on the student and asking for their personal experience on skill development through online and face-to-face learning environments. The data analysis strategy adopts the grounded theory approach, using a systematic procedure. The results suggest that face-to-face learning may develop a better communication and collaborative skills more effectively while experiencing a synchronous interaction, where online learning may strength in self-regulation and adaptability skills because of the independence and flexibility it provides. This study produces two grounded theories that explain how different IT learning environments influence the development of student's specific skills, that can contribute to pedagogical discussions on optimizing hybrid learning experiences.
Related papers
- Safeguarding Privacy: Privacy-Preserving Detection of Mind Wandering and Disengagement Using Federated Learning in Online Education [53.25191965774678]
We propose a framework exploiting cross-device federated learning to address different manifestations of behavioral and cognitive disengagement during remote learning.<n>We fit video-based cognitive disengagement detection models using facial expressions and gaze features.<n>Our results show great promise for privacy-preserving educational technologies promoting learner engagement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-10T15:40:01Z) - Beyond right or wrong : towards redefining adaptive learning indicators in virtual learning environments [0.5437050212139087]
The objective of this work is to elucidate which learning indicators influence student learning and which can be implemented in a VLE to assist in adaptive learning.<n>The works selected and filtered by qualitative assessment reveal a comprehensive approach to assessing different aspects of the learning in virtual environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-13T00:36:45Z) - Exploring Student Interactions with AI-Powered Learning Tools: A Qualitative Study Connecting Interaction Patterns to Educational Learning Theories [0.0]
This study focuses on how students engage with tools like ChatGPT, Grammarly, and Khan Academy.<n>We looked at four types of interaction directive, assistive, dialogic, and empathetic and compared them with learning approaches like behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism, and humanism.<n>Our findings show that how useful an AI tool feels is not just about its features, but also about how students personally connect with it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-29T15:27:37Z) - UCO: A Multi-Turn Interactive Reinforcement Learning Method for Adaptive Teaching with Large Language Models [59.693733170193944]
Large language models (LLMs) are shifting from answer providers to intelligent tutors in educational settings.<n>Recent reinforcement learning approaches address this limitation but face two critical challenges.<n>We propose the Unidirectional Cognitive Optimization (UCO) method to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-12T01:27:02Z) - The Imperfect Learner: Incorporating Developmental Trajectories in Memory-based Student Simulation [55.722188569369656]
This paper introduces a novel framework for memory-based student simulation.<n>It incorporates developmental trajectories through a hierarchical memory mechanism with structured knowledge representation.<n>In practice, we implement a curriculum-aligned simulator grounded on the Next Generation Science Standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-08T08:05:43Z) - Unveiling the Learning Mind of Language Models: A Cognitive Framework and Empirical Study [45.82081693725339]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across tasks such as mathematics, coding, and reasoning.<n>Yet their learning ability, which is crucial for adapting to dynamic environments and acquiring new knowledge, remains underexplored.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T13:24:50Z) - Assessment of Personalized Learning in Immersive and Intelligent Virtual Classroom on Student Engagement [5.982610439839458]
The study aims to provide insights into how personalized learning approaches can enhance student participation, motivation, and academic performance.<n>The eye movement paradigm has the potential to assess student engagement and promote better educational outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-14T06:49:22Z) - Exploring Engagement and Perceived Learning Outcomes in an Immersive Flipped Learning Context [0.195804735329484]
The aim of this study was to explore the benefits and challenges of the immersive flipped learning approach in relation to students' online engagement and perceived learning outcomes.
The study revealed high levels of student engagement and perceived learning outcomes, although it also identified areas needing improvement.
The findings of this study can serve as a valuable resource for educators seeking to design engaging and effective remote learning experiences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T11:38:48Z) - The Other Side of Black Screen: Rethinking Interaction in Synchronous
Remote Learning for Collaborative Programming [0.0]
Collaborative learning environments are crucial for learning experiential hands-on skills such as critical thinking and problem solving.
In this case study, we present observations of in-person and online versions of 2 programming courses offered before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
We find that the current online video-conferencing platforms cannot foster collaborative learning among peers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-11T01:52:12Z) - Comparative Study of Learning Outcomes for Online Learning Platforms [47.5164159412965]
Personalization and active learning are key aspects to successful learning.
We run a comparative head-to-head study of learning outcomes for two popular online learning platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-15T20:40:24Z) - Interaction-limited Inverse Reinforcement Learning [50.201765937436654]
We present two different training strategies: Curriculum Inverse Reinforcement Learning (CIRL) covering the teacher's perspective, and Self-Paced Inverse Reinforcement Learning (SPIRL) focusing on the learner's perspective.
Using experiments in simulations and experiments with a real robot learning a task from a human demonstrator, we show that our training strategies can allow a faster training than a random teacher for CIRL and than a batch learner for SPIRL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-01T12:31:52Z) - Dual Policy Distillation [58.43610940026261]
Policy distillation, which transfers a teacher policy to a student policy, has achieved great success in challenging tasks of deep reinforcement learning.
In this work, we introduce dual policy distillation(DPD), a student-student framework in which two learners operate on the same environment to explore different perspectives of the environment.
The key challenge in developing this dual learning framework is to identify the beneficial knowledge from the peer learner for contemporary learning-based reinforcement learning algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-07T06:49:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.