Behavior and Representation in Large Language Models for Combinatorial Optimization: From Feature Extraction to Algorithm Selection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13374v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:28:35 GMT
• Title: Behavior and Representation in Large Language Models for Combinatorial Optimization: From Feature Extraction to Algorithm Selection
• Authors: Francesca Da Ros, Luca Di Gaspero, Kevin Roitero,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened new perspectives for automation in optimization.<n>This study investigates how LLMs internally represent optimization problems and whether such representations can support downstream decision tasks.
• Score: 2.6285579209051284
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened new perspectives for automation in optimization. While several studies have explored how LLMs can generate or solve optimization models, far less is understood about what these models actually learn regarding problem structure or algorithmic behavior. This study investigates how LLMs internally represent combinatorial optimization problems and whether such representations can support downstream decision tasks. We adopt a twofold methodology combining direct querying, which assesses LLM capacity to explicitly extract instance features, with probing analyses that examine whether such information is implicitly encoded within their hidden layers. The probing framework is further extended to a per-instance algorithm selection task, evaluating whether LLM-derived representations can predict the best-performing solver. Experiments span four benchmark problems and three instance representations. Results show that LLMs exhibit moderate ability to recover feature information from problem instances, either through direct querying or probing. Notably, the predictive power of LLM hidden-layer representations proves comparable to that achieved through traditional feature extraction, suggesting that LLMs capture meaningful structural information relevant to optimization performance.

Related papers

• Towards Efficient Multi-LLM Inference: Characterization and Analysis of LLM Routing and Hierarchical Techniques [14.892995952768352]
  Language Models (LMs) have excelled at tasks like text generation, summarization, and question answering.<n>Their inference remains computationally expensive and energy intensive in settings with limited hardware, power, or bandwidth.<n>Recent approaches have introduced multi LLM intelligent model selection strategies that dynamically allocate computational resources based on query complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T23:13:08Z)
• Iterative Self-Incentivization Empowers Large Language Models as Agentic Searchers [74.17516978246152]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely integrated into information retrieval to advance traditional techniques.<n>We propose EXSEARCH, an agentic search framework, where the LLM learns to retrieve useful information as the reasoning unfolds.<n>Experiments on four knowledge-intensive benchmarks show that EXSEARCH substantially outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T15:27:55Z)
• OR-LLM-Agent: Automating Modeling and Solving of Operations Research Optimization Problems with Reasoning LLM [15.260794368585692]
  We propose OR-LLM-Agent, an AI agent framework built on reasoning LLMs for automated Operations Research problem solving.<n>We show that OR-LLM-Agent utilizing DeepSeek-R1 in its framework outperforms advanced methods, including GPT-o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, DeepSeek-R1, and ORLM, by at least 7% in accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T03:40:50Z)
• Systematic Analysis of LLM Contributions to Planning: Solver, Verifier, Heuristic [6.687149103409949]
  We provide a systematic analysis of how large language models (LLMs) contribute to solving planning problems.<n>Our analysis reveals that although it is difficult for LLMs to generate correct plans out-of-the-box, LLMs are much better at providing feedback signals to intermediate/incomplete solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T18:16:46Z)
• Autoformulation of Mathematical Optimization Models Using LLMs [50.030647274271516]
  This paper approaches the problem of $textitautoformulation$: the automated creation of solver-ready optimization models from natural language problem descriptions.<n>We identify three core challenges of autoformulation: $textit(1)$ the vast, problem-dependent hypothesis space, and $textit(2)$ efficient and diverse exploration of this space under uncertainty.<n>We present a novel method leveraging $textitLarge Language Models$ with $textitMonte-Carlo Tree Search$, exploiting the hierarchical nature of optimization modeling to generate and systematically explore possible formulations
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T20:41:38Z)
• EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For In-Context Exploration [76.66831821738927]
  Large language models (LLMs) remain under-studied in scenarios requiring optimal decision-making under uncertainty.<n>We measure LLMs' (in)ability to make optimal decisions in bandits, a state-less reinforcement learning setting relevant to many applications.<n>Motivated by the existence of optimal exploration algorithms, we propose efficient ways to integrate this algorithmic knowledge into LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:54:03Z)
• Designing Algorithms Empowered by Language Models: An Analytical Framework, Case Studies, and Insights [86.06371692309972]
  This work presents an analytical framework for the design and analysis of large language models (LLMs)-based algorithms.<n>Our proposed framework serves as an attempt to mitigate such headaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T07:39:07Z)
• Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning [53.6472920229013]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks. LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning. We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:08:09Z)
• Adaptive Reinforcement Learning Planning: Harnessing Large Language Models for Complex Information Extraction [14.982446379660633]
  Existing research on large language models (LLMs) shows that they can solve information extraction tasks through multi-step planning. We observe that decomposing complex extraction tasks and extracting them step by step can effectively improve LLMs' performance. This paper proposes a two-stage multi-step method for LLM-based information extraction and adopts the RL framework to execute the multi-step planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T12:11:01Z)
• LLM Inference Unveiled: Survey and Roofline Model Insights [62.92811060490876]
  Large Language Model (LLM) inference is rapidly evolving, presenting a unique blend of opportunities and challenges. Our survey stands out from traditional literature reviews by not only summarizing the current state of research but also by introducing a framework based on roofline model. This framework identifies the bottlenecks when deploying LLMs on hardware devices and provides a clear understanding of practical problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T07:33:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.