Improving Privacy Protection in the area of Behavioural Targeting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13405v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:53:42 GMT
• Title: Improving Privacy Protection in the area of Behavioural Targeting
• Authors: Frederik Johannes Zuiderveen Borgesius,
• Abstract summary: This PhD thesis discusses how European law could improve privacy protection in the area of behavioural targeting.<n>To protect privacy in the area of behavioural targeting, the EU lawmaker mainly relies on the consent requirement for the use of tracking technologies.<n>This study argues for a combined approach of protecting and empowering the individual.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This PhD thesis discusses how European law could improve privacy protection in the area of behavioural targeting. Behavioural targeting, also referred to as online profiling, involves monitoring people's online behaviour, and using the collected information to show people individually targeted advertisements. To protect privacy in the area of behavioural targeting, the EU lawmaker mainly relies on the consent requirement for the use of tracking technologies in the e-Privacy Directive, and on general data protection law. With informed consent requirements, the law aims to empower people to make choices in their best interests. But behavioural studies cast doubt on the effectiveness of the empowerment approach as a privacy protection measure. Many people click "I agree" to any statement that is presented to them. Therefore, to mitigate privacy problems such as chilling effects, this study argues for a combined approach of protecting and empowering the individual. Compared to the current approach, the lawmaker should focus more on protecting people. The PhD thesis is a legal study, but it also incorporates insights from other disciplines, such as computer science, behavioural economics, and media studies. This study is among the first to discuss the implications of behavioural research for European data protection policy. The topic of whether data protection law should apply to pseudonymous data is discussed in depth. The study contains a detailed analysis of the role of informed consent in data protection law, and gives much attention to the tension between protecting and empowering the individual within data protection law.

Related papers

• Contextualized Privacy Defense for LLM Agents [84.30907378390512]
  LLM agents increasingly act on users' personal information, yet existing privacy defenses remain limited in both design and adaptability.<n>We propose Contextualized Defense Instructing (CDI), a new privacy defense paradigm.<n>We show that our CDI consistently achieves a better balance between privacy preservation (94.2%) and helpfulness (80.6%) than baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T13:35:33Z)
• PrivATE: Differentially Private Average Treatment Effect Estimation for Observational Data [49.35645194884526]
  We introduce PrivATE, a practical ATE estimation framework that ensures differential privacy.<n>We design two levels (i.e., label-level and sample-level) of privacy protection in PrivATE to accommodate different privacy requirements.<n>PrivATE effectively balances noise-induced error and matching error, leading to a more accurate estimate of ATE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T16:30:07Z)
• De mythe van geïnformeerde toestemming: online privacybescherming kan beter [Informed Consent: We Can Do Better to Defend Privacy] [0.2262632497140704]
  We need to rethink our approach to defend privacy on the internet.<n>Currently, policymakers focus heavily on the idea of informed consent as a means to defend privacy.<n>This article argues for a combined approach of protecting and empowering the individual.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T14:08:34Z)
• Informed Consent: We Can Do Better to Defend Privacy [0.2262632497140704]
  We need to rethink our approach to defend privacy on the internet.<n>Currently, policymakers focus heavily on the idea of informed consent as a means to defend privacy.<n>This article argues for a combined approach of protecting and empowering the individual.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T14:08:29Z)
• Behavioural Sciences and the Regulation of Privacy on the Internet [0.2262632497140704]
  This chapter examines the policy implications of behavioural sciences insights for the regulation of privacy on the Internet.<n>I argue that, if society is better off when certain behavioural targeting practices do not happen, policymakers should consider banning them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-25T18:55:51Z)
• Perception of Digital Privacy Protection: An Empirical Study using GDPR Framework [0.22628031081632272]
  This study investigates people perception of digital privacy protection of government data using the General Data Protection Perception Regulation ( systems dichotomy) framework. Findings suggest a dichotomy in perception in protecting people privacy rights. The right to object by granting and with-drawing consent is perceived as the least protected. Second, the study shows evidence of a social dilemma in people perception of digital privacy based on their context and culture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T04:36:31Z)
• Collection, usage and privacy of mobility data in the enterprise and public administrations [55.2480439325792]
  Security measures such as anonymization are needed to protect individuals' privacy. Within our study, we conducted expert interviews to gain insights into practices in the field. We survey privacy-enhancing methods in use, which generally do not comply with state-of-the-art standards of differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T08:29:27Z)
• A Survey of Privacy-Preserving Model Explanations: Privacy Risks, Attacks, and Countermeasures [50.987594546912725]
  Despite a growing corpus of research in AI privacy and explainability, there is little attention on privacy-preserving model explanations. This article presents the first thorough survey about privacy attacks on model explanations and their countermeasures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T12:44:48Z)
• SoK: Technical Implementation and Human Impact of Internet Privacy Regulations [2.797211052758564]
  We analyze a set of Internet privacy and data protection regulations drawn from around the world. We develop a taxonomy of rights granted and obligations imposed by these laws. We then leverage this taxonomy to systematize 270 technical research papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-24T01:48:07Z)
• SoK: The Gap Between Data Rights Ideals and Reality [42.769107967436945]
  Do rights-based privacy laws effectively empower individuals over their data?<n>This paper scrutinizes these approaches by reviewing empirical studies, news articles, and blog posts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T21:52:51Z)
• Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a 256GB Open-Source Legal Dataset [46.156169284961045]
  We offer an approach to filtering grounded in law, which has directly addressed the tradeoffs in filtering material. First, we gather and make available the Pile of Law, a 256GB dataset of open-source English-language legal and administrative data. Second, we distill the legal norms that governments have developed to constrain the inclusion of toxic or private content into actionable lessons. Third, we show how the Pile of Law offers researchers the opportunity to learn such filtering rules directly from the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T06:25:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.