De mythe van geïnformeerde toestemming: online privacybescherming kan beter [Informed Consent: We Can Do Better to Defend Privacy]

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05730v1
• Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2025 14:08:34 GMT
• Title: De mythe van geïnformeerde toestemming: online privacybescherming kan beter [Informed Consent: We Can Do Better to Defend Privacy]
• Authors: Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius,
• Abstract summary: We need to rethink our approach to defend privacy on the internet.<n>Currently, policymakers focus heavily on the idea of informed consent as a means to defend privacy.<n>This article argues for a combined approach of protecting and empowering the individual.
• Score: 0.2262632497140704
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We need to rethink our approach to defend privacy on the internet. Currently, policymakers focus heavily on the idea of informed consent as a means to defend privacy. For instance, in many countries the law requires firms to obtain an individual's consent before they use data about her; with such informed consent requirements, the law aims to empower people to make privacy choices in their best interests. But behavioural studies cast doubt on this approach's effectiveness, as people tend to click OK to almost any request they see on their screens. To improve privacy protection, this article argues for a combined approach of protecting and empowering the individual. This article discusses practical problems with informed consent as a means to protect privacy, and illustrates the problems with current data privacy rules regarding behavioural targeting. First, the privacy problems of behavioural targeting, and the central role of informed consent in privacy law are discussed. Following that, practical problems with informed consent are highlighted. Then, the article argues that policymakers should give more attention to rules that protect, rather than empower, people.

Related papers

• Improving Privacy Protection in the area of Behavioural Targeting [0.0]
  This PhD thesis discusses how European law could improve privacy protection in the area of behavioural targeting.<n>To protect privacy in the area of behavioural targeting, the EU lawmaker mainly relies on the consent requirement for the use of tracking technologies.<n>This study argues for a combined approach of protecting and empowering the individual.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T14:53:42Z)
• Informed Consent: We Can Do Better to Defend Privacy [0.2262632497140704]
  We need to rethink our approach to defend privacy on the internet.<n>Currently, policymakers focus heavily on the idea of informed consent as a means to defend privacy.<n>This article argues for a combined approach of protecting and empowering the individual.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T14:08:29Z)
• Activity Recognition on Avatar-Anonymized Datasets with Masked Differential Privacy [64.32494202656801]
  Privacy-preserving computer vision is an important emerging problem in machine learning and artificial intelligence.<n>We present anonymization pipeline that replaces sensitive human subjects in video datasets with synthetic avatars within context.<n>We also proposeMaskDP to protect non-anonymized but privacy sensitive background information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T15:22:53Z)
• PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action [54.11479432110771]
  PrivacyLens is a novel framework designed to extend privacy-sensitive seeds into expressive vignettes and further into agent trajectories.<n>We instantiate PrivacyLens with a collection of privacy norms grounded in privacy literature and crowdsourced seeds.<n>State-of-the-art LMs, like GPT-4 and Llama-3-70B, leak sensitive information in 25.68% and 38.69% of cases, even when prompted with privacy-enhancing instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T17:58:38Z)
• Privacy Checklist: Privacy Violation Detection Grounding on Contextual Integrity Theory [43.12744258781724]
  We formulate the privacy issue as a reasoning problem rather than simple pattern matching.<n>We develop the first comprehensive checklist that covers social identities, private attributes, and existing privacy regulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T14:48:04Z)
• A Critical Take on Privacy in a Datafied Society [0.0]
  I analyze several facets of the lack of online privacy and idiosyncrasies exhibited by privacy advocates. I discuss of possible effects of datafication on human behavior, the prevalent market-oriented assumption at the base of online privacy, and some emerging adaptation strategies. A glimpse on the likely problematic future is provided with a discussion on privacy related aspects of EU, UK, and China's proposed generative AI policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T11:45:18Z)
• PLUE: Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark for Privacy Policies in English [77.79102359580702]
  We introduce the Privacy Policy Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark, a multi-task benchmark for evaluating the privacy policy language understanding. We also collect a large corpus of privacy policies to enable privacy policy domain-specific language model pre-training. We demonstrate that domain-specific continual pre-training offers performance improvements across all tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T05:58:32Z)
• Privacy Explanations - A Means to End-User Trust [64.7066037969487]
  We looked into how explainability might help to tackle this problem. We created privacy explanations that aim to help to clarify to end users why and for what purposes specific data is required. Our findings reveal that privacy explanations can be an important step towards increasing trust in software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T09:30:37Z)
• The Evolving Path of "the Right to Be Left Alone" - When Privacy Meets Technology [0.0]
  This paper proposes a novel vision of the privacy ecosystem, introducing privacy dimensions, the related users' expectations, the privacy violations, and the changing factors. We believe that promising approaches to tackle the privacy challenges move in two directions: (i) identification of effective privacy metrics; and (ii) adoption of formal tools to design privacy-compliant applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-24T11:27:55Z)
• Second layer data governance for permissioned blockchains: the privacy management challenge [58.720142291102135]
  In pandemic situations, such as the COVID-19 and Ebola outbreak, the action related to sharing health data is crucial to avoid the massive infection and decrease the number of deaths. In this sense, permissioned blockchain technology emerges to empower users to get their rights providing data ownership, transparency, and security through an immutable, unified, and distributed database ruled by smart contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T13:19:38Z)
• The Challenges and Impact of Privacy Policy Comprehension [0.0]
  This paper experimentally manipulated the privacy-friendliness of an unavoidable and simple privacy policy. Half of our participants miscomprehended even this transparent privacy policy. To mitigate such pitfalls we present design recommendations to improve the quality of informed consent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T14:16:48Z)
• A vision for global privacy bridges: Technical and legal measures for international data markets [77.34726150561087]
  Despite data protection laws and an acknowledged right to privacy, trading personal information has become a business equated with "trading oil" An open conflict is arising between business demands for data and a desire for privacy. We propose and test a vision of a personal information market with privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T13:55:50Z)
• Dis-Empowerment Online: An Investigation of Privacy-Sharing Perceptions & Method Preferences [6.09170287691728]
  We find that perception of privacy empowerment differs from that of sharing across dimensions of meaningfulness, competence and choice. We find similarities and differences in privacy method preference between the US, UK and Germany. By mapping the perception of privacy dis-empowerment into patterns of privacy behavior online, this paper provides an important foundation for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-19T19:17:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.