Large-Language Memorization During the Classification of United States Supreme Court Cases

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13654v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 18:47:48 GMT
• Title: Large-Language Memorization During the Classification of United States Supreme Court Cases
• Abstract summary: Large-language models (LLMs) have been shown to respond in a variety of ways for classification tasks outside of question-answering.<n>We perform a deep dive into a classification task based on United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decisions.<n>Experimentation is performed with the latest LLM fine tuning and retrieval-based approaches.
• Score: 2.575607461199738
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large-language models (LLMs) have been shown to respond in a variety of ways for classification tasks outside of question-answering. LLM responses are sometimes called "hallucinations" since the output is not what is ex pected. Memorization strategies in LLMs are being studied in detail, with the goal of understanding how LLMs respond. We perform a deep dive into a classification task based on United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decisions. The SCOTUS corpus is an ideal classification task to study for LLM memory accuracy because it presents significant challenges due to extensive sentence length, complex legal terminology, non-standard structure, and domain-specific vocabulary. Experimentation is performed with the latest LLM fine tuning and retrieval-based approaches, such as parameter-efficient fine-tuning, auto-modeling, and others, on two traditional category-based SCOTUS classification tasks: one with 15 labeled topics and another with 279. We show that prompt-based models with memories, such as DeepSeek, can be more robust than previous BERT-based models on both tasks scoring about 2 points better than previous models not based on prompting.

Related papers

• LLMs as annotators of credibility assessment in Danish asylum decisions: evaluating classification performance and errors beyond aggregated metrics [21.604030114864642]
  Off-the-shelf large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate text annotation.<n>We introduce RAB-Cred, a Danish text classification dataset featuring high-quality, expert annotations and valuable metadata.<n>We benchmark 21 open-weight models and 30 system-user prompt combinations for this task, and systematically evaluate the effect of model and prompt choice for zero-shot and few-shot classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T12:07:47Z)
• Blind to the Human Touch: Overlap Bias in LLM-Based Summary Evaluation [89.52571224447111]
  Large language model (LLM) judges have often been used alongside traditional, algorithm-based metrics for tasks like summarization.<n>We provide an LLM judge bias analysis as a function of overlap with human-written responses in the domain of summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T19:39:28Z)
• LLM-guided Hierarchical Retrieval [54.73080745446999]
  LATTICE is a hierarchical retrieval framework that enables an LLM to reason over and navigate large corpora with logarithmic search complexity.<n>A central challenge in such LLM-guided search is that the model's relevance judgments are noisy, context-dependent, and unaware of the hierarchy.<n>Our framework achieves state-of-the-art zero-shot performance on the reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T07:05:17Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Model with Knowledge Oriented Language Specific Simple Question Answering [73.73820209993515]
  We introduce KoLasSimpleQA, the first benchmark evaluating the multilingual factual ability of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Inspired by existing research, we created the question set with features such as single knowledge point coverage, absolute objectivity, unique answers, and temporal stability.<n>Results show significant performance differences between the two domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T12:27:02Z)
• Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models [54.26923012617675]
  We unveil and study idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We find that fine-tuning text embedding models on LLM-generated texts yields excellent classification accuracy.<n>We leverage LLM as judges to generate detailed, open-ended descriptions of each model's idiosyncrasies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:59:02Z)
• Towards Automated Fact-Checking of Real-World Claims: Exploring Task Formulation and Assessment with LLMs [32.45604456988931]
  This study establishes baseline comparisons for Automated Fact-Checking (AFC) using Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We evaluate Llama-3 models of varying sizes on 17,856 claims collected from PolitiFact (2007-2024) using evidence retrieved via restricted web searches.<n>Our results show that larger LLMs consistently outperform smaller LLMs in classification accuracy and justification quality without fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T02:51:17Z)
• Large Language Models For Text Classification: Case Study And Comprehensive Review [0.3428444467046467]
  We evaluate the performance of different Large Language Models (LLMs) in comparison with state-of-the-art deep-learning and machine-learning models.<n>Our work reveals significant variations in model responses based on the prompting strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T22:02:38Z)
• LAMPO: Large Language Models as Preference Machines for Few-shot Ordinal Classification [34.9210323553677]
  We introduce LAMPO, a novel paradigm that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for solving few-shot multi-class ordinal classification tasks. Extensive experiments on seven public datasets demonstrate LAMPO's remarkably competitive performance across a diverse spectrum of applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T15:55:05Z)
• Paraphrase and Aggregate with Large Language Models for Minimizing Intent Classification Errors [19.601600598570215]
  We show that large language models (LLM) can achieve high performance on large multi-class classification tasks but still make classification errors and worse, generate out-of-vocabulary class labels. We introduce Paraphrase and AGgregate (PAG)-LLM approach wherein an LLM generates multiple paraphrases of the input query (parallel queries) We show that PAG-LLM is especially effective for hard examples where LLM is uncertain, and reduces the critical misclassification and hallucinated label generation errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T22:30:26Z)
• RepEval: Effective Text Evaluation with LLM Representation [55.26340302485898]
  RepEval is a metric that leverages the projection of Large Language Models (LLMs) representations for evaluation. Our work underscores the richness of information regarding text quality embedded within LLM representations, offering insights for the development of new metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T13:50:55Z)
• Are More LLM Calls All You Need? Towards Scaling Laws of Compound Inference Systems [76.69936664916061]
  We study how the number of LM calls affects the performance of Vote and Filter-Vote. We find, surprisingly, that across multiple language tasks, the performance of both Vote and Filter-Vote can first increase but then decrease as a function of the number of LM calls.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T19:12:48Z)
• Modeling Legal Reasoning: LM Annotation at the Edge of Human Agreement [3.537369004801589]
  We study the classification of legal reasoning according to jurisprudential philosophy. We use a novel dataset of historical United States Supreme Court opinions annotated by a team of domain experts. We find that generative models perform poorly when given instructions equal to the instructions presented to human annotators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T19:27:59Z)
• Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
  We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools. Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions. Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.