Are More LLM Calls All You Need? Towards Scaling Laws of Compound Inference Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02419v2
• Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 21:20:33 GMT
• Title: Are More LLM Calls All You Need? Towards Scaling Laws of Compound Inference Systems
• Authors: Lingjiao Chen, Jared Quincy Davis, Boris Hanin, Peter Bailis, Ion Stoica, Matei Zaharia, James Zou,
• Abstract summary: We study how the number of LM calls affects the performance of Vote and Filter-Vote. We find, surprisingly, that across multiple language tasks, the performance of both Vote and Filter-Vote can first increase but then decrease as a function of the number of LM calls.
• Score: 76.69936664916061
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Many recent state-of-the-art results in language tasks were achieved using compound systems that perform multiple Language Model (LM) calls and aggregate their responses. However, there is little understanding of how the number of LM calls - e.g., when asking the LM to answer each question multiple times and taking a majority vote - affects such a compound system's performance. In this paper, we initiate the study of scaling properties of compound inference systems. We analyze, theoretically and empirically, how the number of LM calls affects the performance of Vote and Filter-Vote, two of the simplest compound system designs, which aggregate LM responses via majority voting, optionally applying LM filters. We find, surprisingly, that across multiple language tasks, the performance of both Vote and Filter-Vote can first increase but then decrease as a function of the number of LM calls. Our theoretical results suggest that this non-monotonicity is due to the diversity of query difficulties within a task: more LM calls lead to higher performance on "easy" queries, but lower performance on "hard" queries, and non-monotone behavior can emerge when a task contains both types of queries. This insight then allows us to compute, from a small number of samples, the number of LM calls that maximizes system performance, and define an analytical scaling model for both systems. Experiments show that our scaling model can accurately predict the performance of Vote and Filter-Vote systems and thus find the optimal number of LM calls to make.

Related papers

• MM-Embed: Universal Multimodal Retrieval with Multimodal LLMs [78.5013630951288]
  This paper introduces techniques for advancing information retrieval with multimodal large language models (MLLMs) We first study fine-tuning an MLLM as a bi-encoder retriever on 10 datasets with 16 retrieval tasks. We propose modality-aware hard negative mining to mitigate the modality bias exhibited by MLLM retrievers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T20:06:34Z)
• LongHalQA: Long-Context Hallucination Evaluation for MultiModal Large Language Models [96.64960606650115]
  LongHalQA is an LLM-free hallucination benchmark that comprises 6K long and complex hallucination text. LongHalQA is featured by GPT4V-generated hallucinatory data that are well aligned with real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T18:59:58Z)
• AIME: AI System Optimization via Multiple LLM Evaluators [79.03422337674664]
  AIME is an evaluation protocol that utilizes multiple LLMs that each independently generate an evaluation on separate criteria and then combine them via concatenation. We show AIME outperforming baseline methods in code generation tasks, with up to $62%$ higher error detection rate and up to $16%$ higher success rate than a single LLM evaluation protocol on LeetCodeHard and HumanEval datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T04:03:24Z)
• SelectLLM: Query-Aware Efficient Selection Algorithm for Large Language Models [8.558834738072363]
  Large language models (LLMs) have gained increased popularity due to their remarkable success across various tasks. However, individual LLMs have limitations when applied to complex tasks because of such factors as training biases, model sizes, and the datasets used. We introduce SelectLLM, a novel algorithm that directs input queries to the most suitable subset of LLMs from a large pool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T06:11:21Z)
• LAMPO: Large Language Models as Preference Machines for Few-shot Ordinal Classification [34.9210323553677]
  We introduce LAMPO, a novel paradigm that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for solving few-shot multi-class ordinal classification tasks. Extensive experiments on seven public datasets demonstrate LAMPO's remarkably competitive performance across a diverse spectrum of applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T15:55:05Z)
• DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning Graph [70.79413606968814]
  We introduce Dynamic Evaluation of LLMs via Adaptive Reasoning Graph Evolvement (DARG) to dynamically extend current benchmarks with controlled complexity and diversity. Specifically, we first extract the reasoning graphs of data points in current benchmarks and then perturb the reasoning graphs to generate novel testing data. Such newly generated test samples can have different levels of complexity while maintaining linguistic diversity similar to the original benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T04:27:53Z)
• The Impact of Quantization on Retrieval-Augmented Generation: An Analysis of Small LLMs [2.6968321526169503]
  Post-training quantization reduces the computational demand of Large Language Models (LLMs) but can weaken some of their capabilities. This paper explores how quantization affects smaller LLMs' ability to perform retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) Our findings reveal that if a 7B LLM performs the task well, quantization does not impair its performance and long-context reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T08:23:52Z)
• Reasoning on Efficient Knowledge Paths:Knowledge Graph Guides Large Language Model for Domain Question Answering [18.94220625114711]
  Large language models (LLMs) perform surprisingly well and outperform human experts on many tasks. This paper integrates and optimized a pipeline for selecting reasoning paths from KG based on LLM. We also propose a simple and effective subgraph retrieval method based on chain of thought (CoT) and page rank.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T08:28:16Z)
• Query-OPT: Optimizing Inference of Large Language Models via Multi-Query Instructions in Meeting Summarization [7.674972936853123]
  We investigate whether combining the queries for the same input context in a single prompt to minimize repeated calls can be successfully used in meeting summarization. We observe that 100% reliability in generating the response in the expected format is usually limited to certain closed-source LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T19:00:47Z)
• Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback [127.75419038610455]
  Large language models (LLMs) are able to generate human-like, fluent responses for many downstream tasks. This paper proposes a LLM-Augmenter system, which augments a black-box LLM with a set of plug-and-play modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T18:48:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.