The Semantic Architect: How FEAML Bridges Structured Data and LLMs for Multi-Label Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15082v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 04:58:44 GMT
• Title: The Semantic Architect: How FEAML Bridges Structured Data and LLMs for Multi-Label Tasks
• Authors: Wanfu Gao, Zebin He, Jun Gao,
• Abstract summary: Existing feature engineering methods based on large language models (LLMs) have not yet been applied to multi-label learning tasks.<n>We propose Feature Engineering Automation for Multi-Label Learning (FEAML), an automated feature engineering method for multi-label classification.
• Score: 12.329156266251838
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Existing feature engineering methods based on large language models (LLMs) have not yet been applied to multi-label learning tasks. They lack the ability to model complex label dependencies and are not specifically adapted to the characteristics of multi-label tasks. To address the above issues, we propose Feature Engineering Automation for Multi-Label Learning (FEAML), an automated feature engineering method for multi-label classification which leverages the code generation capabilities of LLMs. By utilizing metadata and label co-occurrence matrices, LLMs are guided to understand the relationships between data features and task objectives, based on which high-quality features are generated. The newly generated features are evaluated in terms of model accuracy to assess their effectiveness, while Pearson correlation coefficients are used to detect redundancy. FEAML further incorporates the evaluation results as feedback to drive LLMs to continuously optimize code generation in subsequent iterations. By integrating LLMs with a feedback mechanism, FEAML realizes an efficient, interpretable and self-improving feature engineering paradigm. Empirical results on various multi-label datasets demonstrate that our FEAML outperforms other feature engineering methods.

Related papers

• LM4Opt-RA: A Multi-Candidate LLM Framework with Structured Ranking for Automating Network Resource Allocation [0.7933039558471408]
  We tackle complex analytical and mathematical reasoning tasks requiring nuanced contextual understanding.<n>Existing benchmarks datasets cannot address the complexities of such problems with dynamic environments, variables, and heterogeneous constraints.<n>We introduce NL4RA, a curated dataset comprising 50 resource allocation optimization problems formulated as LP, ILP, and MILP.<n>We then evaluate the performance of well-known open-source LLMs with varying parameter counts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T23:19:43Z)
• Graft: Integrating the Domain Knowledge via Efficient Parameter Synergy for MLLMs [56.76586846269894]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved success across various domains.<n>Despite its importance, the study of knowledge sharing among domain-specific MLLMs remains largely underexplored.<n>We propose a unified parameter integration framework that enables modular composition of expert capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T15:07:41Z)
• LLMs as Data Annotators: How Close Are We to Human Performance [47.61698665650761]
  Manual annotation of data is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and costly.<n>In-context learning (ICL) in which some examples related to the task are given in the prompt can lead to inefficiencies and suboptimal model performance.<n>This paper presents experiments comparing several LLMs, considering different embedding models, across various datasets for the Named Entity Recognition (NER) task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T11:11:07Z)
• LLM-FE: Automated Feature Engineering for Tabular Data with LLMs as Evolutionary Optimizers [10.282327560070202]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled the integration of domain knowledge into the feature engineering process.<n>We propose LLM-FE, a novel framework that combines evolutionary search with the domain knowledge and reasoning capabilities of LLMs.<n>Our results demonstrate that LLM-FE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T17:11:24Z)
• LLM-AutoDiff: Auto-Differentiate Any LLM Workflow [58.56731133392544]
  We introduce LLM-AutoDiff: a novel framework for Automatic Prompt Engineering (APE)<n>LLMs-AutoDiff treats each textual input as a trainable parameter and uses a frozen backward engine to generate feedback-akin to textual gradients.<n>It consistently outperforms existing textual gradient baselines in both accuracy and training cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T03:18:48Z)
• Harnessing LLMs for API Interactions: A Framework for Classification and Synthetic Data Generation [0.0]
  We propose a novel system that integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) for both classifying natural language inputs into corresponding API calls. Our system allows users to invoke complex software functionalities through simple inputs, improving interaction efficiency and lowering the barrier to software utilization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T04:56:52Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• Small LLMs Are Weak Tool Learners: A Multi-LLM Agent [73.54562551341454]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents significantly extend the capabilities of standalone LLMs. We propose a novel approach that decomposes the aforementioned capabilities into a planner, caller, and summarizer. This modular framework facilitates individual updates and the potential use of smaller LLMs for building each capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-14T16:17:07Z)
• MLLM-DataEngine: An Iterative Refinement Approach for MLLM [62.30753425449056]
  We propose a novel closed-loop system that bridges data generation, model training, and evaluation. Within each loop, the MLLM-DataEngine first analyze the weakness of the model based on the evaluation results. For targeting, we propose an Adaptive Bad-case Sampling module, which adjusts the ratio of different types of data. For quality, we resort to GPT-4 to generate high-quality data with each given data type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T01:41:04Z)
• From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
  We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.