In Times of Crisis: An Exploratory Study of Media and Political Discourse on YouTube During the 2024 French Elections
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17768v1
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 16:40:27 GMT
- Title: In Times of Crisis: An Exploratory Study of Media and Political Discourse on YouTube During the 2024 French Elections
- Authors: Vera Sosnovik, Caroline Violot, Mathias Humbert,
- Abstract summary: We analyze over 100,000 video transcripts and metadata from 74 French YouTube channels operated by national news outlets, local media, and political figures.<n>The results reveal distinct thematic patterns across the political spectrum and media types.<n>Less polarizing themes such as video games and nature showed higher approval, reflected in like-to-view ratios.
- Score: 2.456962018536084
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: YouTube has emerged as a major platform for political communication and news dissemination, particularly during high-stakes electoral periods. In the context of the 2024 European Parliament and French legislative elections, this study investigates how political actors and news media used YouTube to shape public discourse. We analyze over 100,000 video transcripts and metadata from 74 French YouTube channels operated by national news outlets, local media, and political figures. To identify the key themes emphasized during the campaign period, we applied a semi-automated method that combined large language models with clustering and manual review. The results reveal distinct thematic patterns across the political spectrum and media types, with right-leaning news outlets focusing on topics like immigration, while left-leaning emphasized protest and media freedom. Themes generating the most audience engagement, measured by comment-to-view ratios, were most often the most polarizing ones. In contrast, less polarizing themes such as video games and nature showed higher approval, reflected in like-to-view ratios. We also observed a general tendency across all media types to portray political figures in neutral or critical terms rather than favorable ones.
Related papers
- Cross-National Evidence of Disproportionate Media Visibility for the Radical Right in the 2024 European Elections [0.030786914102688592]
We analyzed news from leading national outlets in Austria, Germany, Ireland, Poland, and Portugal.<n>We identified parties, political leaders, and groups from the article's URLs and titles.<n>Cross-country comparison shows that the Mainstream and the Radical Right were mentioned more often than the other political groups.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-09T15:00:59Z) - "Talking past each other": Issue ownership and microtargeting in Swiss online political ads [0.3384279376065155]
This paper presents a large-scale, data-driven analysis of 40k political ads published on Facebook and Instagram in Switzerland between 2021 and 2025.<n>It shows that political ads are used not only for federal elections, but also to influence referenda, where greater exposure to pro-Yes'' advertising correlates significantly with approval outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-16T16:35:02Z) - Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z) - Finding Hidden Swing Voters in the 2022 Italian Elections Twitter Discourse [1.3654846342364308]
We examine the dynamics of political messaging and voter behavior on Twitter during the 2022 Italian general elections.
Our analysis reveals that during election periods, the popularity of politicians increases, and there is a notable variation in the use of persuasive language techniques.
Swing voters are more vulnerable to these propaganda techniques compared to non-swing voters, with differences in vulnerability patterns across various types of political shifts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T13:34:29Z) - Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies:
Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings.
We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z) - The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries.<n>We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z) - Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S.
News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022.
We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs.
Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z) - Same Words, Different Meanings: Interpretable Predictions of
Polarization Trends in Broadcast Media Language and Granger Causal Effects on
Public Discourse [7.0525662747824365]
We investigate the relationship between broadcast news media language and social media discourse.
By analyzing a decade's worth of closed captions from CNN and Fox News along with topically corresponding discourse from Twitter, we show how semantic polarization between these outlets has evolved.
Our results demonstrate a sharp increase in polarization in how topically important keywords are discussed between the two channels, especially after 2016, with overall highest peaks occurring in 2020.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-20T23:59:26Z) - Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titles [55.92100606666497]
We first adopt a human-guided machine learning framework to develop a new dataset for hyperpartisan news title detection.
Overall the Right media tends to use proportionally more hyperpartisan titles.
We identify three major topics including foreign issues, political systems, and societal issues that are suggestive of hyperpartisanship in news titles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-16T05:56:58Z) - Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S.
Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections.
Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections.
75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z) - Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online
political polarization [58.720142291102135]
A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations.
This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z) - Uncovering the structure of the French media ecosystem [0.0]
We collect data about the production and circulation of online news stories in France over the course of one year.
A block model of the structure shows the systematic rejection of counter-informational press in a separate cluster.
We conclude that the French media ecosystem does not suffer from the same level of polarization as the US media ecosystem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-26T09:51:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.