Owning the Intelligence: Global AI Patents Landscape and Europe's Quest for Technological Sovereignty

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19569v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 16:52:36 GMT
• Title: Owning the Intelligence: Global AI Patents Landscape and Europe's Quest for Technological Sovereignty
• Abstract summary: China leads in patent volumes, while the United States dominates in citation impact and technological influence.<n>Europe accounts for a limited share of AI patents but exhibits signals of relatively high patent quality.<n>EU membership does not significantly enhance intra-European knowledge diffusion.
• Score: 0.13390068757738613
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence has become a key arena of global technological competition and a central concern for Europe's quest for technological sovereignty. This paper analyzes global AI patenting from 2010 to 2023 to assess Europe's position in an increasingly bipolar innovation landscape dominated by the United States and China. Using linked patent, firm, ownership, and citation data, we examine the geography, specialization, and international diffusion of AI innovation. We find a highly concentrated patent landscape: China leads in patent volumes, while the United States dominates in citation impact and technological influence. Europe accounts for a limited share of AI patents but exhibits signals of relatively high patent quality. Technological proximity reveals global convergence toward U.S. innovation trajectories, with Europe remaining fragmented rather than forming an autonomous pole. Gravity-model estimates show that cross-border AI knowledge flows are driven primarily by technological capability and specialization, while geographic and institutional factors play a secondary role. EU membership does not significantly enhance intra-European knowledge diffusion, suggesting that technological capacity, rather than political integration, underpins participation in global AI innovation networks.

Related papers

• U.S. Policies Unintentionally Accelerated China's Open AI Ecosystems [2.5880359009782055]
  U.S. policies have increasingly aimed to preserve artificial intelligence (AI) leadership by promoting domestic free-market policies.<n>Measures raised the cost of Chinese AI development, but they also increased the strategic value of open and locally adaptable AI systems.<n>These findings suggest that technological containment policies may unintentionally accelerate open innovation ecosystems as a competitive response.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-14T19:55:20Z)
• Polarization and Integration in Global AI Research [1.1470070927586018]
  We measure the processes of polarization and integration in the global AI research over three decades.<n>We find that the US and China have long diverged in both dimensions, forming two poles around which global AI research increasingly revolves.<n> Developing and further developed countries, however, only integrate with China, signaling its expanding influence over the international AI research landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-19T20:21:25Z)
• AI Patents in the United States and China: Measurement, Organization, and Knowledge Flows [0.3249879651054463]
  We develop a high-precision classifier to measure artificial intelligence (AI) patents by fine-tuning PatentSBERTa on manually labeled data.<n>We document rapid growth in AI patenting in both countries and broad convergence in AI patenting intensity and subfield composition.<n>For listed firms, AI patents command a robust market-value premium in both countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-12T08:46:30Z)
• Navigating Turbulence: The Challenge of Inclusive Innovation in the U.S.-China AI Race [2.617708048472989]
  This chapter examines the impact of the geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China on the prospects for inclusive innovation in artificial intelligence (AI) development.<n>We explore three critical aspects of the American and Chinese legal infrastructure that significantly impact AI innovation: data privacy, intellectual property (IP rights) and export restrictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T15:19:40Z)
• Advancing AI Challenges for the United States Department of the Air Force [91.02589169578908]
  The DAF-MIT AI Accelerator is a collaboration between the United States Department of the Air Force (DAF) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)<n>This article supplements our previous publication, which introduced AI Accelerator challenges.<n>We provide an update on how ongoing and new challenges have successfully contributed to AI research and applications of AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-31T21:34:57Z)
• Patents as Knowledge Artifacts: An Information Science Perspective on Global Innovation [0.0]
  This chapter proposes to reframe patents in the context of information science, by focusing on patents as knowledge artifacts.<n>With a focus on three areas, the inventions of AIs, biotech patents, and international competition with patents, this work considers how new technologies are challenging traditional notions of inventorship, access, and moral accountability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-19T16:33:39Z)
• The California Report on Frontier AI Policy [110.35302787349856]
  Continued progress in frontier AI carries the potential for profound advances in scientific discovery, economic productivity, and broader social well-being.<n>As the epicenter of global AI innovation, California has a unique opportunity to continue supporting developments in frontier AI.<n>Report derives policy principles that can inform how California approaches the use, assessment, and governance of frontier AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T23:33:21Z)
• Bridging the Artificial Intelligence Governance Gap: The United States' and China's Divergent Approaches to Governing General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  U.S. and China are among the world's top players in the development of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems.<n>A look at U.S. and Chinese policy landscapes reveals differences in how the two countries approach the governance of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T02:24:27Z)
• Europe's AI Imperative - A Pragmatic Blueprint for Global Tech Leadership [16.711035492718356]
  Europe is at a make-or-break moment in the global AI race, squeezed between the US and China.<n>We present a sharp, doable strategy that builds upon Europe's strengths and closes gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T20:46:04Z)
• Patent Novelty Assessment Accelerating Innovation and Patent Prosecution [0.873811641236639]
  This report introduces a ground-breaking Patent Novelty Assessment and Claim Generation System.<n>Our system provides college students and researchers with an intuitive platform to navigate and grasp the intricacies of patent claims.<n>Unlike conventional analysis systems, our initiative harnesses a proprietary Chinese API to ensure unparalleled precision and relevance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-12T22:25:46Z)
• AI Horizon Scanning -- White Paper p3395, IEEE-SA. Part III: Technology Watch: a selection of key developments, emerging technologies, and industry trends in Artificial Intelligence [0.3277163122167434]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies are in a phase of unprecedented rapid development following the landmark release of Chat-GPT. As the deployment of AI products rises geometrically, considerable attention is being given to the threats and opportunities that AI technologies offer. This manuscript is the third of a series of White Papers informing the development of IEEE-SA's p3995 it Standard for the Implementation of Safeguards, Controls, and Preventive Techniques for Artificial Intelligence Models'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T19:04:42Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences.<n>First, it is not sustainable, as, despite efficiency improvements, its compute demands increase faster than model performance.<n>Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
  Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole. AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access. Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z)
• Selected Trends in Artificial Intelligence for Space Applications [69.3474006357492]
  This chapter focuses on differentiable intelligence and on-board machine learning. We discuss a few selected projects originating from the European Space Agency's (ESA) Advanced Concepts Team (ACT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-10T07:49:50Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.