A Systematic Review of Technical Defenses Against Software-Based Cheating in Online Multiplayer Games
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.21377v1
- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 16:00:45 GMT
- Title: A Systematic Review of Technical Defenses Against Software-Based Cheating in Online Multiplayer Games
- Abstract summary: This systematic literature review surveys technical defenses against software-based cheating in online multiplayer games.<n> Categorizing existing approach-es into server-side detection, client-side anti-tamper, kernel-level anti-cheat drivers, and hardware-assisted TEEs.<n>Overall, the re-view emphasizes the ongoing arms race with cheaters and the need for robust, adversary-resistant anti-cheat designs.
- Score: 1.1458853556386799
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This systematic literature review surveys technical defenses against software-based cheating in online multiplayer games. Categorizing existing approach-es into server-side detection, client-side anti-tamper, kernel-level anti-cheat drivers, and hardware-assisted TEEs. Each category is evaluated in terms of detection effectiveness, perfor-mance overhead, privacy im-pact, and scalability. The analy-sis highlights key trade-offs, particularly between the high visibility of kernel-level solutions and their privacy and stability risks, versus the low intrusive-ness but limited insight of server-side methods. Overall, the re-view emphasizes the ongoing arms race with cheaters and the need for robust, adversary-resistant anti-cheat designs.
Related papers
- AdROD: HyperNetwork-based Adversarially Robust Object Detection for Autonomous Driving [4.4758385009686945]
Camera-based object detectors are vulnerable to physical adversarial attacks designed to suppress detections.<n>This paper presents AdROD, an embedded, ensemble defense software designed for autonomous driving.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-17T02:52:01Z) - Adversarial Attacks for Good: A Survey of Proactive Protection across the Visual Content Lifecycle [65.6642776933861]
This survey examines the protective paradigm that has grown around this intervention point.<n>We find that most protections are still validated mainly against static or weakly adaptive adversaries.<n>We close by consolidating cross-stage countermeasures and open problems for robust, composable, and deployable owner-side protection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-05T00:46:50Z) - Gynopticon: Consensus-Based Cheating Detection System for Competitive Games [0.0]
Cheating in online games poses significant threats to the gaming industry.<n>Most prior research has concentrated on Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games (MMORPGs)<n>We propose GYNOPTICON, a novel cheating detection framework that leverages user consensus to identify abnormal behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-14T06:28:24Z) - A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives [65.3369988566853]
Recent studies have demonstrated that adversaries can replicate a target model's functionality.<n>Model Extraction Attacks pose threats to intellectual property, privacy, and system security.<n>We propose a novel taxonomy that classifies MEAs according to attack mechanisms, defense approaches, and computing environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-20T19:49:59Z) - SoK: Advances and Open Problems in Web Tracking [71.54586748169943]
Web tracking is a pervasive and opaque practice that enables personalized advertising, and conversion tracking.<n>Web tracking is undergoing a once-in-a-generation transformation driven by shifts in the advertising industry, the adoption of anti-tracking countermeasures by browsers, and the growing enforcement of emerging privacy regulations.<n>This Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) aims to consolidate and synthesize this wide-ranging research, offering a comprehensive overview of the technical mechanisms, countermeasures, and regulations that shape the modern and rapidly evolving web tracking landscape.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T23:30:54Z) - Towards Trustworthy GUI Agents: A Survey [64.6445117343499]
This survey examines the trustworthiness of GUI agents in five critical dimensions.<n>We identify major challenges such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks, cascading failure modes in sequential decision-making.<n>As GUI agents become more widespread, establishing robust safety standards and responsible development practices is essential.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-30T13:26:00Z) - Identify As A Human Does: A Pathfinder of Next-Generation Anti-Cheat Framework for First-Person Shooter Games [25.04499987558611]
Cheating in online games poses a significant threat to the integrity of the gaming experience.
The paper proposes HAWK, a server-side FPS anti-cheat framework for the popular game CS:GO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-23T09:00:07Z) - Red Team Redemption: A Structured Comparison of Open-Source Tools for Adversary Emulation [2.0404184397649225]
Red teams simulate adversaries and conduct sophisticated attacks against defenders without informing them about used tactics in advance.
These interactive cyber exercises are highly beneficial to assess and improve the security posture of organizations, detect vulnerabilities, and train employees.
adversary emulation tools partially automate attacker behavior and enable fast, continuous, and repeatable security testing even when involved personnel lacks red teaming experience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-28T09:00:31Z) - If It Looks Like a Rootkit and Deceives Like a Rootkit: A Critical Examination of Kernel-Level Anti-Cheat Systems [0.0]
This paper systematically evaluates the extent to which kernel-level anti-cheat systems mirror the properties of rootkits.
Our analysis shows two of the four anti-cheat solutions exhibiting rootkit-like behaviour, threatening the privacy and the integrity of the system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-01T12:10:03Z) - Attention-Based Real-Time Defenses for Physical Adversarial Attacks in
Vision Applications [58.06882713631082]
Deep neural networks exhibit excellent performance in computer vision tasks, but their vulnerability to real-world adversarial attacks raises serious security concerns.
This paper proposes an efficient attention-based defense mechanism that exploits adversarial channel-attention to quickly identify and track malicious objects in shallow network layers.
It also introduces an efficient multi-frame defense framework, validating its efficacy through extensive experiments aimed at evaluating both defense performance and computational cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-19T00:47:17Z) - Robust Vision-Based Cheat Detection in Competitive Gaming [12.124621973070164]
We propose a vision-based approach that captures the final state of the frame buffer and detects illicit overlays.
Our results show that robust and effective anti-cheating through machine learning is practically feasible.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-18T06:06:52Z) - Increasing the Confidence of Deep Neural Networks by Coverage Analysis [71.57324258813674]
This paper presents a lightweight monitoring architecture based on coverage paradigms to enhance the model against different unsafe inputs.
Experimental results show that the proposed approach is effective in detecting both powerful adversarial examples and out-of-distribution inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-28T16:38:26Z) - Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks and Defense Methods in the Cyber
Security Domain [58.30296637276011]
This paper summarizes the latest research on adversarial attacks against security solutions based on machine learning techniques.
It is the first to discuss the unique challenges of implementing end-to-end adversarial attacks in the cyber security domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-05T18:22:40Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.