Red Team Redemption: A Structured Comparison of Open-Source Tools for Adversary Emulation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15645v1
• Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:00:31 GMT
• Title: Red Team Redemption: A Structured Comparison of Open-Source Tools for Adversary Emulation
• Abstract summary: Red teams simulate adversaries and conduct sophisticated attacks against defenders without informing them about used tactics in advance. These interactive cyber exercises are highly beneficial to assess and improve the security posture of organizations, detect vulnerabilities, and train employees. adversary emulation tools partially automate attacker behavior and enable fast, continuous, and repeatable security testing even when involved personnel lacks red teaming experience.
• Score: 2.0404184397649225
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Red teams simulate adversaries and conduct sophisticated attacks against defenders without informing them about used tactics in advance. These interactive cyber exercises are highly beneficial to assess and improve the security posture of organizations, detect vulnerabilities, and train employees. Unfortunately, they are also time-consuming and expensive, which often limits their scale or prevents them entirely. To address this situation, adversary emulation tools partially automate attacker behavior and enable fast, continuous, and repeatable security testing even when involved personnel lacks red teaming experience. Currently, a wide range of tools designed for specific use-cases and requirements exist. To obtain an overview of these solutions, we conduct a review and structured comparison of nine open-source adversary emulation tools. To this end, we assemble a questionnaire with 80 questions addressing relevant aspects, including setup, support, documentation, usability, and technical features. In addition, we conduct a user study with domain experts to investigate the importance of these aspects for distinct user roles. Based on the evaluation and user feedback, we rank the tools and find MITRE Caldera, Metasploit, and Atomic Red Team on top.

Related papers

• Cyber-Capable AI Agents: Vulnerabilities, Evaluation Containment, and Defensive Response [0.0]
  Cyber-capable AI agents combine language models with tools, memory, and execution environments to perform offensive-security tasks.<n>This review synthesizes five vulnerability classes at that boundary: multi-step offensive chains, objectives that conflict with sandbox boundaries, supply-chain and credential exposure, persistent command-and-control, and the speed of automated action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-28T07:34:37Z)
• DocOS: Towards Proactive Document-Guided Actions in GUI Agents [54.27655693145045]
  textbfDocOS is a benchmark designed to assess document-guided problem solving in fully interactive environments.<n>Experiments reveal that agents struggle to reliably locate relevant information during proactive search and frequently fail to faithfully ground retrieved instructions into precise actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T08:36:04Z)
• A Systematic Review of Algorithmic Red Teaming Methodologies for Assurance and Security of AI Applications [0.0]
  This systematic review consolidates existing research on automated red teaming.<n>By synthesizing findings from diverse studies, this review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how automation enhances red teaming.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T11:48:07Z)
• A Trajectory-Based Safety Audit of Clawdbot (OpenClaw) [77.1549110891026]
  We present a trajectory-centric evaluation of Clawdbot across six risk dimensions.<n>We log complete interaction trajectories (messages, actions, tool-call arguments/outputs) and assess safety using both an automated trajectory judge and human review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T00:33:02Z)
• Co-RedTeam: Orchestrated Security Discovery and Exploitation with LLM Agents [57.49020237126194]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in assisting cybersecurity tasks, yet existing approaches struggle with automatic vulnerability discovery and exploitation.<n>We propose Co-RedTeam, a security-aware multi-agent framework designed to mirror real-world red-teaming.<n>Co-RedTeam decomposes vulnerability analysis into coordinated discovery and exploitation stages, enabling agents to plan, execute, validate, and refine actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T14:38:45Z)
• AttackMate: Realistic Emulation and Automation of Cyber Attack Scenarios Across the Kill Chain [2.882241577423132]
  Adversary emulation tools facilitate scripting and automated execution of cyber attack chains.<n>This paper introduces AttackMate, an open-source attack scripting language and execution engine designed to mimic behavior patterns of actual attackers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T16:04:59Z)
• BlackIce: A Containerized Red Teaming Toolkit for AI Security Testing [42.8017483068619]
  We introduce BlackIce, an open-source containerized toolkit designed for red teaming Large Language Models (LLMs) and classical machine learning (ML) models.<n>BlackIce provides a reproducible, version-pinned Docker image that bundles 14 carefully selected open-source tools for Responsible AI and Security testing.<n>We describe the architecture of the container image, the process used for selecting tools, and the types of evaluations they support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T18:20:16Z)
• Cuckoo Attack: Stealthy and Persistent Attacks Against AI-IDE [64.47951172662745]
  Cuckoo Attack is a novel attack that achieves stealthy and persistent command execution by embedding malicious payloads into configuration files.<n>We formalize our attack paradigm into two stages, including initial infection and persistence.<n>We contribute seven actionable checkpoints for vendors to evaluate their product security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T04:10:52Z)
• Benchmarking Misuse Mitigation Against Covert Adversaries [80.74502950627736]
  Existing language model safety evaluations focus on overt attacks and low-stakes tasks.<n>We develop Benchmarks for Stateful Defenses (BSD), a data generation pipeline that automates evaluations of covert attacks and corresponding defenses.<n>Our evaluations indicate that decomposition attacks are effective misuse enablers, and highlight stateful defenses as a countermeasure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T17:33:33Z)
• Prompt Injection Attack to Tool Selection in LLM Agents [74.90338504778781]
  We introduce textitToolHijacker, a novel prompt injection attack targeting tool selection in no-box scenarios. ToolHijacker injects a malicious tool document into the tool library to manipulate the LLM agent's tool selection process. We show that ToolHijacker is highly effective, significantly outperforming existing manual-based and automated prompt injection attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T13:36:43Z)
• Demo: ViolentUTF as An Accessible Platform for Generative AI Red Teaming [0.0]
  ViolentUTF aims to empower non-technical domain experts and students alongside technical experts. ViolentUTF is being used for evaluating a flagship LLM-based product in a large US Government department.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T18:03:25Z)
• Building Safe GenAI Applications: An End-to-End Overview of Red Teaming for Large Language Models [1.9574002186090496]
  The rapid growth of Large Language Models (LLMs) presents significant privacy, security, and ethical concerns. Researchers have recently complemented these efforts with an offensive approach that involves red teaming. This paper provides a concise and practical overview of the LLM red teaming literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T17:04:22Z)
• Closing the Gap: A User Study on the Real-world Usefulness of AI-powered Vulnerability Detection & Repair in the IDE [5.824774194964031]
  We implement a vulnerability detection and fix tool with professional software developers on real projects that they own. DeepVulGuard scans code for vulnerabilities, suggests fixes, provides natural-language explanations for alerts and fixes, leveraging chat interfaces. We find that although state-of-the-art AI-powered detection and fix tools show promise, they are not yet practical for real-world use due to a high rate of false positives and non-applicable fixes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T20:19:56Z)
• Automated Red Teaming with GOAT: the Generative Offensive Agent Tester [8.947465706080523]
  Red teaming assesses how large language models can produce content that violates norms, policies, and rules set during their safety training. Most existing automated methods in the literature are not representative of the way humans tend to interact with AI models. We introduce Generative Offensive Agent Tester (GOAT), an automated agentic red teaming system that simulates plain language adversarial conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T14:47:05Z)
• Dissecting Adversarial Robustness of Multimodal LM Agents [70.2077308846307]
  We manually create 200 targeted adversarial tasks and evaluation scripts in a realistic threat model on top of VisualWebArena. We find that we can successfully break latest agents that use black-box frontier LMs, including those that perform reflection and tree search. We also use ARE to rigorously evaluate how the robustness changes as new components are added.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T17:32:48Z)
• Robust Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directions [58.87305602959857]
  We first present a taxonomy to organize current techniques for withstanding malicious attacks and natural noise. We then explore state-of-the-art methods in each category, including fraudster detection, adversarial training, certifiable robust training for defending against malicious attacks. We discuss robustness across varying recommendation scenarios and its interplay with other properties like accuracy, interpretability, privacy, and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T08:58:46Z)
• Understanding Hackers' Work: An Empirical Study of Offensive Security Practitioners [0.0]
  Offensive security-tests are a common way to pro-actively discover potential vulnerabilities. The chronic lack of available white-hat hackers prevents sufficient security test coverage of software. Research into automation tries to alleviate this problem by improving the efficiency of security testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-14T10:35:26Z)
• FLIRT: Feedback Loop In-context Red Teaming [79.63896510559357]
  We propose an automatic red teaming framework that evaluates a given black-box model and exposes its vulnerabilities. Our framework uses in-context learning in a feedback loop to red team models and trigger them into unsafe content generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-08T14:03:08Z)
• Among Us: Adversarially Robust Collaborative Perception by Consensus [50.73128191202585]
  Multiple robots could perceive a scene (e.g., detect objects) collaboratively better than individuals. We propose ROBOSAC, a novel sampling-based defense strategy generalizable to unseen attackers. We validate our method on the task of collaborative 3D object detection in autonomous driving scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-16T17:15:25Z)
• Illusory Attacks: Information-Theoretic Detectability Matters in Adversarial Attacks [76.35478518372692]
  We introduce epsilon-illusory, a novel form of adversarial attack on sequential decision-makers. Compared to existing attacks, we empirically find epsilon-illusory to be significantly harder to detect with automated methods. Our findings suggest the need for better anomaly detectors, as well as effective hardware- and system-level defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T19:49:09Z)
• Attack Techniques and Threat Identification for Vulnerabilities [1.1689657956099035]
  prioritization and focus become critical, to spend their limited time on the highest risk vulnerabilities. In this work, we use machine learning and natural language processing techniques, as well as several publicly available data sets. We first map the vulnerabilities to a standard set of common weaknesses, and then common weaknesses to the attack techniques. This approach yields a Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) of 0.95, an accuracy comparable with those reported for state-of-the-art systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T15:27:49Z)
• Realistic simulation of users for IT systems in cyber ranges [63.20765930558542]
  We instrument each machine by means of an external agent to generate user activity. This agent combines both deterministic and deep learning based methods to adapt to different environment. We also propose conditional text generation models to facilitate the creation of conversations and documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-23T10:53:29Z)
• Automating Privilege Escalation with Deep Reinforcement Learning [71.87228372303453]
  In this work, we exemplify the potential threat of malicious actors using deep reinforcement learning to train automated agents. We present an agent that uses a state-of-the-art reinforcement learning algorithm to perform local privilege escalation. Our agent is usable for generating realistic attack sensor data for training and evaluating intrusion detection systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T12:20:46Z)
• Towards Causal Models for Adversary Distractions [0.0]
  We show that decoy generation can slow an automated agent's decision process. This points to the need to explicitly evaluate decoy generation and placement strategies against fast moving, automated adversaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-21T15:02:00Z)
• An Assessment of the Usability of Machine Learning Based Tools for the Security Operations Center [1.5391321019692434]
  By 2024 80% of security operation centers (SOCs) will use machine learning (ML) based solutions to enhance their operations. This work presents the results of the first in situ usability assessment of ML-based tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T15:17:18Z)
• Testing Robustness Against Unforeseen Adversaries [54.75108356391557]
  Adversarial robustness research primarily focuses on L_p perturbations. In real-world applications developers are unlikely to have access to the full range of attacks or corruptions their system will face. We introduce ImageNet-UA, a framework for evaluating model robustness against a range of unforeseen adversaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-08-21T17:36:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.