If It Looks Like a Rootkit and Deceives Like a Rootkit: A Critical Examination of Kernel-Level Anti-Cheat Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00500v1
• Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 12:10:03 GMT
• Title: If It Looks Like a Rootkit and Deceives Like a Rootkit: A Critical Examination of Kernel-Level Anti-Cheat Systems
• Authors: Christoph Dorner, Lukas Daniel Klausner,
• Abstract summary: This paper systematically evaluates the extent to which kernel-level anti-cheat systems mirror the properties of rootkits. Our analysis shows two of the four anti-cheat solutions exhibiting rootkit-like behaviour, threatening the privacy and the integrity of the system.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Addressing a critical aspect of cybersecurity in online gaming, this paper systematically evaluates the extent to which kernel-level anti-cheat systems mirror the properties of rootkits, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between protective and potentially invasive software. After establishing a definition for rootkits (making distinctions between rootkits and simple kernel-level applications) and defining metrics to evaluate such software, we introduce four widespread kernel-level anti-cheat solutions. We lay out the inner workings of these types of software, assess them according to our previously established definitions, and discuss ethical considerations and the possible privacy infringements introduced by such programs. Our analysis shows two of the four anti-cheat solutions exhibiting rootkit-like behaviour, threatening the privacy and the integrity of the system. This paper thus provides crucial insights for researchers and developers in the field of gaming security and software engineering, highlighting the need for informed development practices that carefully consider the intersection of effective anti-cheat mechanisms and user privacy.

Related papers

• System Calls for Malware Detection and Classification: Methodologies and Applications [0.49109372384514843]
  This chapter takes a deep down look at how system calls are used in malware detection and classification.<n>It covers techniques like static and dynamic analysis, as well as sandboxing.<n>The chapter also explores how these techniques are applied across different systems, including Windows, Linux, and Android.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T08:11:27Z)
• Security through the Eyes of AI: How Visualization is Shaping Malware Detection [12.704411714353787]
  We evaluate existing visualization-based approaches applied to malware detection and classification.<n>Within this framework, we analyze state-of-the-art approaches across the critical stages of the malware detection pipeline.<n>We shed light on the main challenges in visualization-based approaches and provide insights into the advancements and potential future directions in this critical field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T13:53:56Z)
• Towards Trustworthy GUI Agents: A Survey [64.6445117343499]
  This survey examines the trustworthiness of GUI agents in five critical dimensions. We identify major challenges such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks, cascading failure modes in sequential decision-making. As GUI agents become more widespread, establishing robust safety standards and responsible development practices is essential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T13:26:00Z)
• Software Vulnerability Analysis Across Programming Language and Program Representation Landscapes: A Survey [9.709395737136006]
  This article systematically examines programming languages, levels of program representation, categories of vulnerabilities, and detection techniques. It provides a detailed understanding of current practices in vulnerability discovery, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and distinguishing characteristics. It outlines promising directions for future research in the field of software security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T05:22:48Z)
• CRAFT: Characterizing and Root-Causing Fault Injection Threats at Pre-Silicon [4.83186491286234]
  This work presents a comprehensive methodology for conducting controlled fault injection attacks at the pre-silicon level. As the driving application, we use the clock glitch attacks in AI/ML applications for critical misclassification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T20:17:46Z)
• Honest to a Fault: Root-Causing Fault Attacks with Pre-Silicon RISC Pipeline Characterization [4.83186491286234]
  This study aims to characterize and diagnose the impact of faults within the RISC-V instruction set and pipeline stages, while tracing fault propagation from the circuit level to the AI/ML application software. This analysis resulted in discovering a novel vulnerability through controlled clock glitch parameters, specifically targeting the RISC-V decode stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T20:08:12Z)
• AILuminate: Introducing v1.0 of the AI Risk and Reliability Benchmark from MLCommons [62.374792825813394]
  This paper introduces AILuminate v1.0, the first comprehensive industry-standard benchmark for assessing AI-product risk and reliability. The benchmark evaluates an AI system's resistance to prompts designed to elicit dangerous, illegal, or undesirable behavior in 12 hazard categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T05:58:52Z)
• Real-Time Multi-Modal Subcomponent-Level Measurements for Trustworthy System Monitoring and Malware Detection [20.93359969847573]
  Modern computers are complex systems with multiple interacting subcomponents. We propose a "subcomponent-level" approach to collect side channel measurements. By enabling real-time measurements from multiple subcomponents, the goal is to provide a deeper visibility into system operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-22T18:44:00Z)
• MASKDROID: Robust Android Malware Detection with Masked Graph Representations [56.09270390096083]
  We propose MASKDROID, a powerful detector with a strong discriminative ability to identify malware. We introduce a masking mechanism into the Graph Neural Network based framework, forcing MASKDROID to recover the whole input graph. This strategy enables the model to understand the malicious semantics and learn more stable representations, enhancing its robustness against adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T07:22:47Z)
• Privacy-Preserving State Estimation in the Presence of Eavesdroppers: A Survey [10.366696004684822]
  Networked systems are increasingly the target of cyberattacks. Eavesdropping attacks aim to infer information by collecting system data and exploiting it for malicious purposes. It is crucial to protect disclosed system data to avoid an accurate state estimation by eavesdroppers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T06:32:07Z)
• A novel pattern recognition system for detecting Android malware by analyzing suspicious boot sequences [5.218427110506892]
  This paper introduces a malware detection system for smartphones based on studying the dynamic behavior of suspicious applications. The approach focuses on identifying malware addressed against the Android platform. The proposal has been tested in different experiments that include an in-depth study of a particular use case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T22:21:54Z)
• Burning the Adversarial Bridges: Robust Windows Malware Detection Against Binary-level Mutations [16.267773730329207]
  We conduct root-cause analyses of the practical binary-level black-box adversarial malware examples. We highlight volatile information channels within the software and introduce three software pre-processing steps to eliminate the attack surface. To counter the emerging section injection attacks, we propose a graph-based section-dependent information extraction scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T03:28:02Z)
• DRSM: De-Randomized Smoothing on Malware Classifier Providing Certified Robustness [58.23214712926585]
  We develop a certified defense, DRSM (De-Randomized Smoothed MalConv), by redesigning the de-randomized smoothing technique for the domain of malware detection. Specifically, we propose a window ablation scheme to provably limit the impact of adversarial bytes while maximally preserving local structures of the executables. We are the first to offer certified robustness in the realm of static detection of malware executables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T17:25:22Z)
• Explainable Intrusion Detection Systems (X-IDS): A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities [0.0]
  Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) have received widespread adoption due to their ability to handle vast amounts of data with a high prediction accuracy. IDSs designed using Deep Learning (DL) techniques are often treated as black box models and do not provide a justification for their predictions. This survey reviews the state-of-the-art in explainable AI (XAI) for IDS, its current challenges, and discusses how these challenges span to the design of an X-IDS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T14:31:46Z)
• Towards a Fair Comparison and Realistic Design and Evaluation Framework of Android Malware Detectors [63.75363908696257]
  We analyze 10 influential research works on Android malware detection using a common evaluation framework. We identify five factors that, if not taken into account when creating datasets and designing detectors, significantly affect the trained ML models. We conclude that the studied ML-based detectors have been evaluated optimistically, which justifies the good published results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T08:28:08Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)
• Towards robust sensing for Autonomous Vehicles: An adversarial perspective [82.83630604517249]
  It is of primary importance that the resulting decisions are robust to perturbations. Adversarial perturbations are purposefully crafted alterations of the environment or of the sensory measurements. A careful evaluation of the vulnerabilities of their sensing system(s) is necessary in order to build and deploy safer systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T05:25:15Z)
• Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks and Defense Methods in the Cyber Security Domain [58.30296637276011]
  This paper summarizes the latest research on adversarial attacks against security solutions based on machine learning techniques. It is the first to discuss the unique challenges of implementing end-to-end adversarial attacks in the cyber security domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-05T18:22:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.