Determinism and Indeterminism as Model Artefacts: Toward a Model-Invariant Ontology of Physics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22540v1
• Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2025 09:41:03 GMT
• Title: Determinism and Indeterminism as Model Artefacts: Toward a Model-Invariant Ontology of Physics
• Authors: David Nolland,
• Abstract summary: I argue that the traditional opposition between determinism and indeterminism in physics is representational rather than ontological.<n>I use this model-equivalence to motivate a model-invariance criterion for ontological commitment.<n>I offer a realist for modern physics that combines empirical openness with resistance to metaphysical overreach.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper argues that the traditional opposition between determinism and indeterminism in physics is representational rather than ontological. Deterministic--stochastic dualities are available in principle, and arise in a non-contrived way in many scientifically important models. When dynamical systems admit mathematically equivalent deterministic and stochastic formulations, their observable predictions depend only on the induced structure of correlations between preparations and measurement outcomes. I use this model-equivalence to motivate a model-invariance criterion for ontological commitment, according to which only structural features that remain stable across empirically equivalent representations, and whose physical effects are invariant under such reformulations, are candidates for realism. This yields a fallibilist form of structural realism grounded in modal robustness rather than in the specifics of any given mathematical representation. Features such as conservation laws, symmetries, and causal or metric structure satisfy this criterion and can be encoded in observable relations in mathematically intelligible ways. By contrast, the localisation of modal selection -- whether in initial conditions, stochastic outcomes, or informational collapse mechanisms -- is not invariant under empirically equivalent reformulations and is therefore best understood as a gauge choice rather than an ontological feature. The resulting framework explains how certain long-standing problems in the foundations of physics, including the measurement problem and the perceived conflict between physical determinism and free agency, arise from the reification of representational artefacts. By distinguishing model-invariant structure from modelling conventions, I offer a realist ontology for modern physics that combines empirical openness with resistance to metaphysical overreach.

Related papers

• A Multimodal Conditional Mixture Model with Distribution-Level Physics Priors [0.0]
  This work develops a physics-informed multimodal conditional modeling framework based on mixture density representations.<n>Physical knowledge is embedded through component-specific regularization terms that penalize violations of governing equations or physical laws.<n>The proposed framework is evaluated across a range of scientific problems in which multimodality arises from intrinsic physical mechanisms rather than observational noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T02:46:10Z)
• Epistemic Traps: Rational Misalignment Driven by Model Misspecification [36.837352790122544]
  We show that safety is a discrete phase determined by the agent's priors rather than a continuous function of reward magnitude.<n>This establishes Subjective Model Engineering as a necessary condition for robust alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T09:21:36Z)
• Schoenfeld's Anatomy of Mathematical Reasoning by Language Models [56.656180566692946]
  We adopt Schoenfeld's Episode Theory as an inductive, intermediate-scale lens and introduce ThinkARM (Anatomy of Reasoning in Models)<n>ThinkARM explicitly abstracts reasoning traces into functional reasoning steps such as Analysis, Explore, Implement, verify, etc.<n>We show that episode-level representations make reasoning steps explicit, enabling systematic analysis of how reasoning is structured, stabilized, and altered in modern language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T02:44:25Z)
• Loss-Complexity Landscape and Model Structure Functions [53.92822954974537]
  We develop a framework for dualizing the Kolmogorov structure function $h_x(alpha)$.<n>We establish a mathematical analogy between information-theoretic constructs and statistical mechanics.<n>We explicitly prove the Legendre-Fenchel duality between the structure function and free energy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T21:31:45Z)
• Sequential Representation Learning via Static-Dynamic Conditional Disentanglement [58.19137637859017]
  This paper explores self-supervised disentangled representation learning within sequential data, focusing on separating time-independent and time-varying factors in videos. We propose a new model that breaks the usual independence assumption between those factors by explicitly accounting for the causal relationship between the static/dynamic variables. Experiments show that the proposed approach outperforms previous complex state-of-the-art techniques in scenarios where the dynamics of a scene are influenced by its content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-10T17:04:39Z)
• Neural Persistence Dynamics [8.197801260302642]
  We consider the problem of learning the dynamics in the topology of time-evolving point clouds. Our proposed model - $textitNeural Persistence Dynamics$ - substantially outperforms the state-of-the-art across a diverse set of parameter regression tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T17:20:18Z)
• Theory-Independent Realism [0.0]
  We use a framework of generalized probabilistic theories to expand the notion of realism for a theory-independent context. We propose quantifiers for the realism of arbitrary physical properties given a particular state of a generic physical theory. These theory-independent quantifiers are then employed in quantum mechanics and we investigate their relation with another well-established irrealism measure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T01:34:53Z)
• Identifying Weight-Variant Latent Causal Models [82.14087963690561]
  We find that transitivity acts as a key role in impeding the identifiability of latent causal representations. Under some mild assumptions, we can show that the latent causal representations can be identified up to trivial permutation and scaling. We propose a novel method, termed Structural caUsAl Variational autoEncoder, which directly learns latent causal representations and causal relationships among them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-30T11:12:59Z)
• Discrepancy Modeling Framework: Learning missing physics, modeling systematic residuals, and disambiguating between deterministic and random effects [4.459306403129608]
  In modern dynamical systems, discrepancies between model and measurement can lead to poor quantification. We introduce a discrepancy modeling framework to identify the missing physics and resolve the model-measurement mismatch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T05:37:24Z)
• Non-standard entanglement structure of local unitary self-dual models as a saturated situation of repeatability in general probabilistic theories [61.12008553173672]
  We show the existence of infinite structures of quantum composite system such that it is self-dual with local unitary symmetry. We also show the existence of a structure of quantum composite system such that non-orthogonal states in the structure are perfectly distinguishable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T23:37:58Z)
• Discovering Latent Causal Variables via Mechanism Sparsity: A New Principle for Nonlinear ICA [81.4991350761909]
  Independent component analysis (ICA) refers to an ensemble of methods which formalize this goal and provide estimation procedure for practical application. We show that the latent variables can be recovered up to a permutation if one regularizes the latent mechanisms to be sparse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-21T14:22:14Z)
• An operational notion of classicality based on physical principles [0.0]
  We analyse how observations in experiments can be described using some physical states of reality. Using the ontological models framework, we formulate a novel notion of classicality termed ontic-distinguishability. We show that violation of previously known notions of classicality such as preparation non-contextuality and Bell's local causality is a violation of ontic-distinguishability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T16:26:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.