Problems With Large Language Models for Learner Modelling: Why LLMs Alone Fall Short for Responsible Tutoring in K--12 Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23036v1
• Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 18:26:22 GMT
• Title: Problems With Large Language Models for Learner Modelling: Why LLMs Alone Fall Short for Responsible Tutoring in K--12 Education
• Authors: Danial Hooshyar, Yeongwook Yang, Gustav Šíř, Tommi Kärkkäinen, Raija Hämäläinen, Mutlu Cukurova, Roger Azevedo,
• Abstract summary: The rapid rise of large language model (LLM)-based tutors in K--12 education has fostered a misconception that generative models can replace traditional learner modelling for adaptive instruction.<n>This study synthesises evidence on limitations of LLM-based tutors and empirically investigates one critical issue: the accuracy, reliability, and temporal coherence of assessing learners' evolving knowledge over time.
• Score: 4.658972861389497
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The rapid rise of large language model (LLM)-based tutors in K--12 education has fostered a misconception that generative models can replace traditional learner modelling for adaptive instruction. This is especially problematic in K--12 settings, which the EU AI Act classifies as high-risk domain requiring responsible design. Motivated by these concerns, this study synthesises evidence on limitations of LLM-based tutors and empirically investigates one critical issue: the accuracy, reliability, and temporal coherence of assessing learners' evolving knowledge over time. We compare a deep knowledge tracing (DKT) model with a widely used LLM, evaluated zero-shot and fine-tuned, using a large open-access dataset. Results show that DKT achieves the highest discrimination performance (AUC = 0.83) on next-step correctness prediction and consistently outperforms the LLM across settings. Although fine-tuning improves the LLM's AUC by approximately 8\% over the zero-shot baseline, it remains 6\% below DKT and produces higher early-sequence errors, where incorrect predictions are most harmful for adaptive support. Temporal analyses further reveal that DKT maintains stable, directionally correct mastery updates, whereas LLM variants exhibit substantial temporal weaknesses, including inconsistent and wrong-direction updates. These limitations persist despite the fine-tuned LLM requiring nearly 198 hours of high-compute training, far exceeding the computational demands of DKT. Our qualitative analysis of multi-skill mastery estimation further shows that, even after fine-tuning, the LLM produced inconsistent mastery trajectories, while DKT maintained smooth and coherent updates. Overall, the findings suggest that LLMs alone are unlikely to match the effectiveness of established intelligent tutoring systems, and that responsible tutoring requires hybrid frameworks that incorporate learner modelling.

Related papers

• Is More Context Always Better? Examining LLM Reasoning Capability for Time Interval Prediction [15.45305246863211]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in reasoning and prediction across different domains.<n>This paper presents a systematic study investigating whether LLMs can predict time intervals between recurring user actions.<n>We benchmark state-of-the-art LLMs in zero-shot settings against both statistical and machine-learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T07:18:40Z)
• A Training-Free Large Reasoning Model-based Knowledge Tracing Framework for Unified Prediction and Prescription [3.3366918244744617]
  Thinking-KT is a training-free KT framework that incorporates Test-Time Scaling (TTS)<n>Our results demonstrate that TTS is a critical yet underexplored factor in LLM-based KT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T01:02:21Z)
• LLM-CAS: Dynamic Neuron Perturbation for Real-Time Hallucination Correction [11.5874975353231]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate hallucinated content that lacks factual or contextual grounding.<n>We propose LLM-CAS, a framework that formulates real-time correction as a hierarchical reinforcement learning problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-21T06:54:34Z)
• Revisiting LLMs as Zero-Shot Time-Series Forecasters: Small Noise Can Break Large Models [32.30528039193554]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance across diverse tasks without domain-specific training.<n>Recent studies suggest that LLMs lack inherent effectiveness in forecasting.<n>Our experiments show that LLM-based zero-shot forecasters often struggle to achieve high accuracy due to their sensitivity to noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-31T08:24:01Z)
• Towards Objective Fine-tuning: How LLMs' Prior Knowledge Causes Potential Poor Calibration? [19.38577744626441]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often demonstrate poor calibration with confidence scores misaligned with actual performance.<n>Our research reveals that LLMs' prior knowledge causes potential poor calibration due to the ubiquitous presence of known data in real-world fine-tuning.<n>We propose CogCalib, a cognition-aware framework that applies targeted learning strategies according to the model's prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T08:51:31Z)
• S$^2$R: Teaching LLMs to Self-verify and Self-correct via Reinforcement Learning [51.84977135926156]
  We introduce S$2$R, an efficient framework that enhances LLM reasoning by teaching models to self-verify and self-correct during inference.<n>Our results demonstrate that Qwen2.5-math-7B achieves an accuracy improvement from 51.0% to 81.6%, outperforming models trained on an equivalent amount of long-CoT distilled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T13:40:22Z)
• Self-Evolving Critique Abilities in Large Language Models [59.861013614500024]
  This paper explores enhancing critique abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We introduce SCRIT, a framework that trains LLMs with self-generated data to evolve their critique abilities.<n>Our analysis reveals that SCRIT's performance scales positively with data and model size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T05:51:52Z)
• LLM2: Let Large Language Models Harness System 2 Reasoning [65.89293674479907]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive capabilities across a myriad of tasks, yet they occasionally yield undesirable outputs.<n>We introduce LLM2, a novel framework that combines an LLM with a process-based verifier.<n>LLMs2 is responsible for generating plausible candidates, while the verifier provides timely process-based feedback to distinguish desirable and undesirable outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-29T06:32:36Z)
• Temporal Scaling Law for Large Language Models [70.74571133406958]
  We propose the novel concept of Temporal Scaling Law, studying how the test loss of an LLM evolves as the training steps scale up.<n>In contrast to modeling the test loss as a whole in a coarse-grained manner, we break it down and dive into the fine-grained test loss of each token position.<n>We derive the much more precise temporal scaling law by studying the temporal patterns of the parameters in the dynamic hyperbolic-law.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-27T05:49:11Z)
• TRACE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Continual Learning in Large Language Models [52.734140807634624]
  Aligned large language models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional capabilities in task-solving, following instructions, and ensuring safety. Existing continual learning benchmarks lack sufficient challenge for leading aligned LLMs. We introduce TRACE, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate continual learning in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T16:38:49Z)
• Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
  We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools. Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions. Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z)
• An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuning [70.48605869773814]
  Catastrophic forgetting (CF) is a phenomenon that occurs in machine learning when a model forgets previously learned information.<n>This study empirically evaluates the forgetting phenomenon in large language models during continual instruction tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T02:53:23Z)
• Pareto Optimal Learning for Estimating Large Language Model Errors [12.21899680905672]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive abilities in many applications. We present a method that generates a risk score to estimate the probability of error in an LLM response by integrating multiple sources of information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T21:11:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.