Jailbreaking Attacks vs. Content Safety Filters: How Far Are We in the LLM Safety Arms Race?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24044v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 07:36:19 GMT
• Title: Jailbreaking Attacks vs. Content Safety Filters: How Far Are We in the LLM Safety Arms Race?
• Abstract summary: We present the first systematic evaluation of jailbreak attacks targeting large language models (LLMs)<n>Our findings suggest that prior assessments may have overestimated the practical success of these attacks.<n>There remains room to better balance recall and precision to further optimize protection and user experience.
• Score: 35.085164240720815
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed, ensuring their safe use is paramount. Jailbreaking, adversarial prompts that bypass model alignment to trigger harmful outputs, present significant risks, with existing studies reporting high success rates in evading common LLMs. However, previous evaluations have focused solely on the models, neglecting the full deployment pipeline, which typically incorporates additional safety mechanisms like content moderation filters. To address this gap, we present the first systematic evaluation of jailbreak attacks targeting LLM safety alignment, assessing their success across the full inference pipeline, including both input and output filtering stages. Our findings yield two key insights: first, nearly all evaluated jailbreak techniques can be detected by at least one safety filter, suggesting that prior assessments may have overestimated the practical success of these attacks; second, while safety filters are effective in detection, there remains room to better balance recall and precision to further optimize protection and user experience. We highlight critical gaps and call for further refinement of detection accuracy and usability in LLM safety systems.

Related papers

• Attributing and Exploiting Safety Vectors through Global Optimization in Large Language Models [50.91504059485288]
  We propose a framework that identifies safety-critical attention heads through global optimization over all heads simultaneously.<n>We develop a novel inference-time white-box jailbreak method that exploits the identified safety vectors through activation repatching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T09:32:43Z)
• SafeLLM: Unlearning Harmful Outputs from Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks [29.963044242980345]
  Jailbreak attacks pose a serious threat to the safety of Large Language Models.<n>We propose SafeLLM, a novel unlearning-based defense framework.<n>We show that SafeLLM substantially reduces attack success rates while maintaining high general-purpose performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T02:39:14Z)
• Context Misleads LLMs: The Role of Context Filtering in Maintaining Safe Alignment of LLMs [7.183743839410718]
  Malicious users often exploit adversarial context to deceive Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>In this study, we propose a new defense mechanism called Context Filtering model.<n>Our model demonstrates its ability to reduce the Attack Success Rates of jailbreak attacks by up to 88%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-09T02:37:59Z)
• ARMOR: Aligning Secure and Safe Large Language Models via Meticulous Reasoning [64.32925552574115]
  ARMOR is a large language model that analyzes jailbreak strategies and extracts the core intent.<n> ARMOR achieves state-of-the-art safety performance, with an average harmful rate of 0.002 and an attack success rate of 0.06 against advanced optimization-based jailbreaks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T09:05:54Z)
• SafeKey: Amplifying Aha-Moment Insights for Safety Reasoning [76.56522719330911]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) introduce a new generation paradigm of explicitly reasoning before answering.<n>LRMs pose great safety risks against harmful queries and adversarial attacks.<n>We propose SafeKey to better activate the safety aha moment in the key sentence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T03:46:03Z)
• Improving LLM Safety Alignment with Dual-Objective Optimization [81.98466438000086]
  Existing training-time safety alignment techniques for large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks.<n>We propose an improved safety alignment that disentangles DPO objectives into two components: (1) robust refusal training, which encourages refusal even when partial unsafe generations are produced, and (2) targeted unlearning of harmful knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T18:01:05Z)
• Reasoning-to-Defend: Safety-Aware Reasoning Can Defend Large Language Models from Jailbreaking [54.10710423370126]
  We propose Reasoning-to-Defend (R2D), a training paradigm that integrates a safety-aware reasoning mechanism into Large Language Models' generation process.<n>CPO enhances the model's perception of the safety status of given dialogues.<n>Experiments demonstrate that R2D effectively mitigates various attacks and improves overall safety, while maintaining the original performances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:48:46Z)
• STAIR: Improving Safety Alignment with Introspective Reasoning [44.780098674618614]
  We propose STAIR, a framework that integrates SafeTy Alignment with Itrospective Reasoning.<n>We show that STAIR effectively mitigates harmful outputs while better preserving helpfulness, compared to instinctive alignment strategies.<n>With test-time scaling, STAIR achieves a safety performance comparable to Claude-3.5 against popular jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T15:02:55Z)
• You Can't Eat Your Cake and Have It Too: The Performance Degradation of LLMs with Jailbreak Defense [34.023473699165315]
  We study the utility degradation, safety elevation, and exaggerated-safety escalation of LLMs with jailbreak defense strategies.<n>We find that mainstream jailbreak defenses fail to ensure both safety and performance simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T15:24:29Z)
• Uncovering Safety Risks of Large Language Models through Concept Activation Vector [13.804245297233454]
  We introduce a Safety Concept Activation Vector (SCAV) framework to guide attacks on large language models (LLMs)<n>We then develop an SCAV-guided attack method that can generate both attack prompts and embedding-level attacks.<n>Our attack method significantly improves the attack success rate and response quality while requiring less training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T09:46:25Z)
• Fine-Tuning, Quantization, and LLMs: Navigating Unintended Outcomes [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption across various domains, including chatbots and auto-task completion agents. These models are susceptible to safety vulnerabilities such as jailbreaking, prompt injection, and privacy leakage attacks. This study investigates the impact of these modifications on LLM safety, a critical consideration for building reliable and secure AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T20:31:45Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
  We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities.<n>Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content.<n>We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.