Advanced Vulnerability Scanning for Open Source Software: Detection and Mitigation of Log4j Vulnerabilities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00235v1
• Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2026 06:58:11 GMT
• Title: Advanced Vulnerability Scanning for Open Source Software: Detection and Mitigation of Log4j Vulnerabilities
• Authors: Victor Wen, Zedong Peng,
• Abstract summary: This research aims to develop an advanced Log4j scanning tool.<n>It can evaluate the real-world exploitability of the software, thereby reducing false positives.<n>By leveraging GitHub Actions, our tool offers automated and continuous scanning capabilities.
• Score: 0.2979301924660566
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Automated detection of software vulnerabilities remains a critical challenge in software security. Log4j is an industrial-grade Java logging framework listed as one of the top 100 critical open source projects. On Dec. 10, 2021 a severe vulnerability Log4Shell was disclosed before being fully patched with Log4j2 version 2.17.0 on Dec. 18, 2021. However, to this day about 4.1 million, or 33 percent of all Log4j downloads in the last 7 days contain vulnerable packages. Many Log4Shell scanners have since been created to detect if a user's installed Log4j version is vulnerable. Current detection tools primarily focus on identifying the version of Log4j installed, leading to numerous false positives, as they do not check if the software scanned is really vulnerable to malicious actors. This research aims to develop an advanced Log4j scanning tool that can evaluate the real-world exploitability of the software, thereby reducing false positives. Our approach first identifies vulnerabilities and then provides targeted recommendations for mitigating these detected vulnerabilities, along with instant feedback to users. By leveraging GitHub Actions, our tool offers automated and continuous scanning capabilities, ensuring timely identification of vulnerabilities as code changes occur. This integration into existing development workflows enables real-time monitoring and quicker responses to potential threats. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by evaluating 28 open-source software projects across different releases, achieving an accuracy rate of 91.4% from a sample of 140 scans. Our GitHub action implementation is available at the GitHub marketplace and can be accessed by anyone interested in improving their software security and for future studies. This tool provides a dependable way to detect and mitigate vulnerabilities in open-source projects.

Related papers

• Chasing One-day Vulnerabilities Across Open Source Forks [3.777973175977788]
  This paper presents a novel approach to help developers identify one-day vulnerabilities in forked repositories.<n>The approach propagates vulnerability information at the commit level and performs automated impact analysis.<n>It enables automatic detection of forked projects that have not incorporated fixes, leaving them potentially vulnerable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T09:25:47Z)
• Trace: Securing Smart Contract Repository Against Access Control Vulnerability [58.02691083789239]
  GitHub hosts numerous smart contract repositories containing source code, documentation, and configuration files.<n>Third-party developers often reference, reuse, or fork code from these repositories during custom development.<n>Existing tools for detecting smart contract vulnerabilities are limited in their ability to handle complex repositories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T05:18:28Z)
• Certifiably robust malware detectors by design [48.367676529300276]
  We propose a new model architecture for robust malware detection by design.<n>We show that every robust detector can be decomposed into a specific structure, which can be applied to learn empirically robust malware detectors.<n>Our framework ERDALT is based on this structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T09:19:29Z)
• CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scale [45.97598662617568]
  We introduce CyberGym, a large-scale benchmark featuring 1,507 real-world vulnerabilities across 188 software projects.<n>We show that CyberGym leads to the discovery of 35 zero-day vulnerabilities and 17 historically incomplete patches.<n>These results underscore that CyberGym is not only a robust benchmark for measuring AI's progress in cybersecurity but also a platform for creating direct, real-world security impact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T07:35:14Z)
• Eradicating the Unseen: Detecting, Exploiting, and Remediating a Path Traversal Vulnerability across GitHub [1.2124551005857036]
  Vulnerabilities in open-source software can cause cascading effects in the modern digital ecosystem.<n>We identified 1,756 vulnerable open-source projects, some of which are very influential.<n>We have responsibly disclosed the vulnerability to the maintainers, and 14% of the reported vulnerabilities have been remediated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T16:29:21Z)
• Unraveling Log4Shell: Analyzing the Impact and Response to the Log4j Vulnerabil [0.7499722271664147]
  This paper details the discovery of the Log4Shell vulnerability and its potential for exploitation.<n>It examines the vulnerability's impact on various stakeholders, including governments, the Apache Software Foundation (which manages the Log4j library) and companies affected by it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T16:50:34Z)
• Discovery of Timeline and Crowd Reaction of Software Vulnerability Disclosures [47.435076500269545]
  Apache Log4J was found to be vulnerable to remote code execution attacks. More than 35,000 packages were forced to update their Log4J libraries with the latest version. It is practically reasonable for software developers to update their third-party libraries whenever the software vendors have released a vulnerable-free version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T01:55:51Z)
• FV8: A Forced Execution JavaScript Engine for Detecting Evasive Techniques [53.288368877654705]
  FV8 is a modified V8 JavaScript engine designed to identify evasion techniques in JavaScript code. It selectively enforces code execution on APIs that conditionally inject dynamic code. It identifies 1,443 npm packages and 164 (82%) extensions containing at least one type of evasion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T19:54:19Z)
• Vulnerability Scanners for Ethereum Smart Contracts: A Large-Scale Study [44.25093111430751]
  In 2023 alone, such vulnerabilities led to substantial financial losses exceeding a billion of US dollars. Various tools have been developed to detect and mitigate vulnerabilities in smart contracts. This study investigates the gap between the effectiveness of existing security scanners and the vulnerabilities that still persist in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T11:26:26Z)
• How well does LLM generate security tests? [8.454827764115631]
  Developers often build software on top of third-party libraries (Libs) to improve productivity and software quality. People refer to such attacks as supply chain attacks, the documented number of which has increased 742% in 2022. We used ChatGPT-4.0 to generate security tests, and to demonstrate how vulnerable library dependencies facilitate the supply chain attacks to given Apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T16:00:58Z)
• On the Security Blind Spots of Software Composition Analysis [46.1389163921338]
  We present a novel approach to detect vulnerable clones in the Maven repository. We retrieve over 53k potential vulnerable clones from Maven Central. We detect 727 confirmed vulnerable clones and synthesize a testable proof-of-vulnerability project for each of those.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T20:14:46Z)
• Detecting Security Patches via Behavioral Data in Code Repositories [11.052678122289871]
  We show a system to automatically identify security patches using only the developer behavior in the Git repository. We showed we can reveal concealed security patches with an accuracy of 88.3% and F1 Score of 89.8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-04T06:43:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.