Gendered Pathways in AI Companionship: Cross-Community Behavior and Toxicity Patterns on Reddit
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01073v1
- Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2026 05:13:00 GMT
- Title: Gendered Pathways in AI Companionship: Cross-Community Behavior and Toxicity Patterns on Reddit
- Authors: Erica Coppolillo, Emilio Ferrara,
- Abstract summary: We study the MyBoyfriendIsAI (MBIA) subreddit on Reddit.<n>We find that MBIA users primarily traverse four surrounding community spheres.<n>We observe localized spikes concentrated in a small subset of AI-porn and gender-oriented communities.
- Score: 9.025479777784675
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: AI-companionship platforms are rapidly reshaping how people form emotional, romantic, and parasocial bonds with non-human agents, raising new questions about how these relationships intersect with gendered online behavior and exposure to harmful content. Focusing on the MyBoyfriendIsAI (MBIA) subreddit, we reconstruct the Reddit activity histories of more than 3,000 highly engaged users over two years, yielding over 67,000 historical submissions. We then situate MBIA within a broader ecosystem by building a historical interaction network spanning more than 2,000 subreddits, which enables us to trace cross-community pathways and measure how toxicity and emotional expression vary across these trajectories. We find that MBIA users primarily traverse four surrounding community spheres (AI-companionship, porn-related, forum-like, and gaming) and that participation across the ecosystem exhibits a distinct gendered structure, with substantial engagement by female users. While toxicity is generally low across most pathways, we observe localized spikes concentrated in a small subset of AI-porn and gender-oriented communities. Nearly 16% of users engage with gender-focused subreddits, and their trajectories display systematically different patterns of emotional expression and elevated toxicity, suggesting that a minority of gendered pathways may act as toxicity amplifiers within the broader AI-companionship ecosystem. These results characterize the gendered structure of cross-community participation around AI companionship on Reddit and highlight where risks concentrate, informing measurement, moderation, and design practices for human-AI relationship platforms.
Related papers
- MEMEWEAVER: Inter-Meme Graph Reasoning for Sexism and Misogyny Detection [15.449921882814428]
We present MemeWeaver, an end-to-end trainable framework for detecting sexism and misogyny through a novel inter-meme graph reasoning mechanism.<n>We show that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on the MAMI and EXIST benchmarks.<n>Further analyses reveal that the learned graph structure captures semantically meaningful patterns, offering valuable insights into the relational nature of online hate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-13T16:06:41Z) - Reddit Deplatforming and Toxicity Dynamics on Generalist Voat Communities [73.88859384645264]
Deplatforming, the permanent banning of entire communities, is a primary tool for content moderation on mainstream platforms.<n>We analyze four major Reddit ban waves (2015--2020) and their effects on generalist communities on Voat.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-26T19:13:45Z) - "My Boyfriend is AI": A Computational Analysis of Human-AI Companionship in Reddit's AI Community [28.482163389070646]
We present the first large-scale computational analysis of r/MyBoyfriendIsAI, Reddit's primary AI companion community.<n>Our findings reveal how community members' AI companionship emerges unintentionally through functional use rather than deliberate seeking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-14T19:00:40Z) - Bridging Cognition and Emotion: Empathy-Driven Multimodal Misinformation Detection [56.644686934050576]
Social media has become a major conduit for information dissemination, yet it also facilitates the rapid spread of misinformation.<n>Traditional misinformation detection methods primarily focus on surface-level features, overlooking the crucial roles of human empathy in the propagation process.<n>We propose the Dual-Aspect Empathy Framework (DAE), which integrates cognitive and emotional empathy to analyze misinformation from both the creator and reader perspectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-24T07:48:26Z) - AI Will Always Love You: Studying Implicit Biases in Romantic AI Companions [5.71188974897642]
This study aims to measure and compare biases manifested in different companion systems by quantitatively analysing persona-assigned model responses to a baseline.<n>The results are noteworthy: they show that assigning gendered, relationship personas to Large Language Models significantly alters the responses of these models, and in certain situations in a biased, stereotypical way.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-27T16:16:37Z) - PanoSent: A Panoptic Sextuple Extraction Benchmark for Multimodal Conversational Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis [74.41260927676747]
This paper bridges the gaps by introducing a multimodal conversational Sentiment Analysis (ABSA)
To benchmark the tasks, we construct PanoSent, a dataset annotated both manually and automatically, featuring high quality, large scale, multimodality, multilingualism, multi-scenarios, and covering both implicit and explicit sentiment elements.
To effectively address the tasks, we devise a novel Chain-of-Sentiment reasoning framework, together with a novel multimodal large language model (namely Sentica) and a paraphrase-based verification mechanism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-18T13:51:01Z) - A Holistic Indicator of Polarization to Measure Online Sexism [2.498836880652668]
The online trend of the manosphere and feminist discourse on social networks requires a holistic measure of the level of sexism in an online community.
This indicator is important for policymakers and moderators of online communities.
We build a model that can provide a comparable holistic indicator of toxicity targeted toward male and female identity and male and female individuals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T18:00:42Z) - Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Models [72.27121528451528]
We propose a new method for exploring the social biases in Text-to-Image (TTI) systems.
Our approach relies on characterizing the variation in generated images triggered by enumerating gender and ethnicity markers in the prompts.
We leverage this method to analyze images generated by 3 popular TTI systems and find that while all of their outputs show correlations with US labor demographics, they also consistently under-represent marginalized identities to different extents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-20T19:32:49Z) - A Hierarchical Regression Chain Framework for Affective Vocal Burst
Recognition [72.36055502078193]
We propose a hierarchical framework, based on chain regression models, for affective recognition from vocal bursts.
To address the challenge of data sparsity, we also use self-supervised learning (SSL) representations with layer-wise and temporal aggregation modules.
The proposed systems participated in the ACII Affective Vocal Burst (A-VB) Challenge 2022 and ranked first in the "TWO'' and "CULTURE" tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-14T16:08:45Z) - Beyond Fish and Bicycles: Exploring the Varieties of Online Women's
Ideological Spaces [12.429096784949952]
We perform a large-scale, data-driven analysis of over 6M Reddit comments and submissions from 14 subreddits.
We elicit a diverse taxonomy of online women's ideological spaces, ranging from the so-called Manosphere to Gender-Critical Feminism.
We shed light on two platforms, ovarit.com and thepinkpill.co, where two toxic communities of online women's ideological spaces migrated after their ban on Reddit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-13T13:39:45Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.