Beyond Fish and Bicycles: Exploring the Varieties of Online Women's Ideological Spaces

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.07099v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 13:39:45 GMT
• Title: Beyond Fish and Bicycles: Exploring the Varieties of Online Women's Ideological Spaces
• Authors: Utkucan Balci, Chen Ling, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Megan Squire, Gianluca Stringhini, Jeremy Blackburn
• Abstract summary: We perform a large-scale, data-driven analysis of over 6M Reddit comments and submissions from 14 subreddits. We elicit a diverse taxonomy of online women's ideological spaces, ranging from the so-called Manosphere to Gender-Critical Feminism. We shed light on two platforms, ovarit.com and thepinkpill.co, where two toxic communities of online women's ideological spaces migrated after their ban on Reddit.
• Score: 12.429096784949952
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Internet has been instrumental in connecting under-represented and vulnerable groups of people. Platforms built to foster social interaction and engagement have enabled historically disenfranchised groups to have a voice. One such vulnerable group is women. In this paper, we explore the diversity in online women's ideological spaces using a multi-dimensional approach. We perform a large-scale, data-driven analysis of over 6M Reddit comments and submissions from 14 subreddits. We elicit a diverse taxonomy of online women's ideological spaces, ranging from counterparts to the so-called Manosphere to Gender-Critical Feminism. We then perform content analysis, finding meaningful differences across topics and communities. Finally, we shed light on two platforms, ovarit.com and thepinkpill.co, where two toxic communities of online women's ideological spaces (Gender-Critical Feminism and Femcels) migrated after their ban on Reddit.

Related papers

• A multitask learning framework for leveraging subjectivity of annotators to identify misogyny [47.175010006458436]
  We propose a multitask learning approach to enhance the performance of the misogyny identification systems. We incorporated diverse perspectives from annotators in our model design, considering gender and age across six profile groups. This research advances content moderation and highlights the importance of embracing diverse perspectives to build effective online moderation systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T15:06:08Z)
• Women are less comfortable expressing opinions online than men and report heightened fears for safety: Surveying gender differences in experiences of online harms [0.7916214711737172]
  Women are significantly more fearful of being targeted by harms overall. They report greater negative psychological impact as a result of particular experiences. Women report higher use of a range of safety tools and less comfort with several forms of online participation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T22:16:03Z)
• Identity Construction in a Misogynist Incels Forum [5.260305201345233]
  We examine how identity groups are discussed on incels-dot-is, the largest black-pilled incels forum. We find that this community produces a wide range of novel identity terms and, while terms for women are most common, mentions of other minoritized identities are increasing. An analysis of the associations made with identity groups suggests an essentialist ideology where physical appearance, as well as gender and racial hierarchies, determine human value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T18:56:28Z)
• "I'm fully who I am": Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generation [69.25368160338043]
  Transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals disproportionately experience discrimination and exclusion from daily life. We assess how the social reality surrounding experienced marginalization of TGNB persons contributes to and persists within Open Language Generation. We introduce TANGO, a dataset of template-based real-world text curated from a TGNB-oriented community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T04:21:45Z)
• Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
  We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z)
• #ContextMatters: Advantages and Limitations of Using Machine Learning to Support Women in Politics [0.15749416770494704]
  ParityBOT was deployed across elections in Canada, the United States and New Zealand. It was used to analyse and classify more than 12 million tweets directed at women candidates and counter toxic tweets with supportive ones. We examine the rate of false negatives, where ParityBOT failed to pick up on insults directed at specific high profile women.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-30T22:55:49Z)
• Gender bias in magazines oriented to men and women: a computational approach [58.720142291102135]
  We compare the content of a women-oriented magazine with that of a men-oriented one, both produced by the same editorial group over a decade. With Topic Modelling techniques we identify the main themes discussed in the magazines and quantify how much the presence of these topics differs between magazines over time. Our results show that the frequency of appearance of the topics Family, Business and Women as sex objects, present an initial bias that tends to disappear over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T14:02:49Z)
• Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis [51.39895377836919]
  COVID-19 has sparked racism and hate on social media targeted towards Asian communities. We study the evolution and spread of anti-Asian hate speech through the lens of Twitter. We create COVID-HATE, the largest dataset of anti-Asian hate and counterspeech spanning 14 months.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-25T21:58:09Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
• Text-mining forma mentis networks reconstruct public perception of the STEM gender gap in social media [0.0]
  Textual forma mentis networks (TFMNs) are glass boxes introduced for extracting, representing and understanding mindsets' structure. TFMNs were applied to the case study of the gender gap in science, which was strongly linked to distorted mindsets by recent studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-18T13:39:23Z)
• The Evolution of the Manosphere Across the Web [10.296060842125682]
  We present a large-scale characterization of the Manosphere, a conglomerate of Web-based misogynist movements roughly focused on "men's issues" We do so by gathering and analyzing 28.8M posts from 6 forums and 51 subreddits. We find that milder and older communities, such as Pick Up Artists and Men's Rights Activists, are giving way to more extremist ones like Incels and Men Going Their Own Way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T15:14:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.