Textual Explanations and Their Evaluations for Reinforcement Learning Policy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02514v1
• Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2026 19:38:07 GMT
• Title: Textual Explanations and Their Evaluations for Reinforcement Learning Policy
• Authors: Ahmad Terra, Mohit Ahmed, Rafia Inam, Elena Fersman, Martin Törngren,
• Abstract summary: An Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) policy is crucial for ensuring that autonomous agents behave according to human expectations.<n>We present a novel framework for generating textual explanations, converting them into a set of transparent rules, improving their quality, and evaluating them.<n>This framework addresses the limitations of an existing method, Autonomous Policy Explanation, and the generated transparent rules can achieve satisfactory performance on certain tasks.
• Score: 1.1972808233380563
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Understanding a Reinforcement Learning (RL) policy is crucial for ensuring that autonomous agents behave according to human expectations. This goal can be achieved using Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) techniques. Although textual explanations are easily understood by humans, ensuring their correctness remains a challenge, and evaluations in state-of-the-art remain limited. We present a novel XRL framework for generating textual explanations, converting them into a set of transparent rules, improving their quality, and evaluating them. Expert's knowledge can be incorporated into this framework, and an automatic predicate generator is also proposed to determine the semantic information of a state. Textual explanations are generated using a Large Language Model (LLM) and a clustering technique to identify frequent conditions. These conditions are then converted into rules to evaluate their properties, fidelity, and performance in the deployed environment. Two refinement techniques are proposed to improve the quality of explanations and reduce conflicting information. Experiments were conducted in three open-source environments to enable reproducibility, and in a telecom use case to evaluate the industrial applicability of the proposed XRL framework. This framework addresses the limitations of an existing method, Autonomous Policy Explanation, and the generated transparent rules can achieve satisfactory performance on certain tasks. This framework also enables a systematic and quantitative evaluation of textual explanations, providing valuable insights for the XRL field.

Related papers

• Leveraging LLM Parametric Knowledge for Fact Checking without Retrieval [60.25608870901428]
  Trustworthiness is a core research challenge for agentic AI systems built on Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose the task of fact-checking without retrieval, focusing on the verification of arbitrary natural language claims, independent of their source robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T18:42:51Z)
• EtCon: Edit-then-Consolidate for Reliable Knowledge Editing [85.20993502078899]
  We propose Edit-then-Consolidate, a novel knowledge editing paradigm that aims to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge editing methods and their real-world applicability.<n>Our framework consistently improves editing reliability and generalization under real-world evaluations, while better preserving locality and pre-trained capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T12:43:50Z)
• SMA: Who Said That? Auditing Membership Leakage in Semi-Black-box RAG Controlling [50.66950115630554]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and its Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MRAG) significantly improve the knowledge coverage and contextual understanding of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>However, retrieval and multimodal fusion obscure content provenance, rendering existing membership inference methods unable to reliably attribute generated outputs to pre-training, external retrieval, or user input, thus undermining privacy leakage accountability.<n>We propose the first Source-aware Membership Audit (SMA) that enables fine-grained source attribution of generated content in a semi-black-box setting with retrieval control capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T17:32:24Z)
• Explainability-Driven Quality Assessment for Rule-Based Systems [0.7303392100830282]
  This paper introduces an explanation framework designed to enhance the quality of rules in knowledge-based reasoning systems.<n>It generates explanations of rule inferences and leverages human interpretation to refine rules.<n>Its practicality is demonstrated through a use case in finance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T11:26:09Z)
• From Explainability to Interpretability: Interpretable Policies in Reinforcement Learning Via Model Explanation [2.08099858257632]
  We propose a novel model-agnostic approach to transform complex deep RL policies into transparent representations.<n>We evaluate our approach with three existing deep RL algorithms and validate its performance in two classic control environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T22:11:03Z)
• SelfPrompt: Autonomously Evaluating LLM Robustness via Domain-Constrained Knowledge Guidelines and Refined Adversarial Prompts [0.6291443816903801]
  This paper introduces a novel framework designed to autonomously evaluate the robustness of large language models (LLMs)<n>Our method generates descriptive sentences from domain-constrained knowledge graph triplets to formulate adversarial prompts.<n>This self-evaluation mechanism allows the LLM to evaluate its robustness without the need for external benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-01T10:58:53Z)
• SCENE: Evaluating Explainable AI Techniques Using Soft Counterfactuals [0.0]
  This paper introduces SCENE (Soft Counterfactual Evaluation for Natural language Explainability), a novel evaluation method. By focusing on token-based substitutions, SCENE creates contextually appropriate and semantically meaningful Soft Counterfactuals. SCENE provides valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of various XAI techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T16:36:24Z)
• TRACE: TRansformer-based Attribution using Contrastive Embeddings in LLMs [50.259001311894295]
  We propose a novel TRansformer-based Attribution framework using Contrastive Embeddings called TRACE. We show that TRACE significantly improves the ability to attribute sources accurately, making it a valuable tool for enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-06T07:19:30Z)
• Introducing User Feedback-based Counterfactual Explanations (UFCE) [49.1574468325115]
  Counterfactual explanations (CEs) have emerged as a viable solution for generating comprehensible explanations in XAI. UFCE allows for the inclusion of user constraints to determine the smallest modifications in the subset of actionable features. UFCE outperforms two well-known CE methods in terms of textitproximity, textitsparsity, and textitfeasibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T20:09:44Z)
• Accountability in Offline Reinforcement Learning: Explaining Decisions with a Corpus of Examples [70.84093873437425]
  This paper introduces the Accountable Offline Controller (AOC) that employs the offline dataset as the Decision Corpus. AOC operates effectively in low-data scenarios, can be extended to the strictly offline imitation setting, and displays qualities of both conservation and adaptability. We assess AOC's performance in both simulated and real-world healthcare scenarios, emphasizing its capability to manage offline control tasks with high levels of performance while maintaining accountability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T17:20:32Z)
• Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learning [68.8204255655161]
  We review recent works in the direction to attain Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) In critical situations where it is essential to justify and explain the agent's behaviour, better explainability and interpretability of RL models could help gain scientific insight on the inner workings of what is still considered a black box.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-15T10:11:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.