ToxiGAN: Toxic Data Augmentation via LLM-Guided Directional Adversarial Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03121v1
• Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2026 15:50:46 GMT
• Title: ToxiGAN: Toxic Data Augmentation via LLM-Guided Directional Adversarial Generation
• Abstract summary: ToxiGAN is a class-aware text augmentation framework that combines adversarial generation with semantic guidance from large language models (LLMs)<n>ToxiGAN achieves the strongest average performance in both macro-F1 and hate-F1, consistently outperforming traditional and LLM-based augmentation methods.
• Score: 2.982975056815848
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Augmenting toxic language data in a controllable and class-specific manner is crucial for improving robustness in toxicity classification, yet remains challenging due to limited supervision and distributional skew. We propose ToxiGAN, a class-aware text augmentation framework that combines adversarial generation with semantic guidance from large language models (LLMs). To address common issues in GAN-based augmentation such as mode collapse and semantic drift, ToxiGAN introduces a two-step directional training strategy and leverages LLM-generated neutral texts as semantic ballast. Unlike prior work that treats LLMs as static generators, our approach dynamically selects neutral exemplars to provide balanced guidance. Toxic samples are explicitly optimized to diverge from these exemplars, reinforcing class-specific contrastive signals. Experiments on four hate speech benchmarks show that ToxiGAN achieves the strongest average performance in both macro-F1 and hate-F1, consistently outperforming traditional and LLM-based augmentation methods. Ablation and sensitivity analyses further confirm the benefits of semantic ballast and directional training in enhancing classifier robustness.

Related papers

• Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data [55.84428098924793]
  We propose Constrained Uniform Top-K Sampling (CUTS), a parameter-free decoding strategy enforcing structure-preserving exploration.<n>We integrate this into Mixed-CUTS, a training framework synergizing exploitative and exploratory rollouts to amplify intra-group advantage variance.<n> Notably, Mixed-CUTS improves Pass@1 accuracy on the challenging AIME25 benchmark by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T16:43:28Z)
• Early Decisions Matter: Proximity Bias and Initial Trajectory Shaping in Non-Autoregressive Diffusion Language Models [54.16797570104461]
  Diffusion-based language models (dLLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to autoregressive language models.<n>We investigate non-autoregressive decoding in dLLMs by systematically analyzing its inference dynamics along the temporal axis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-12T10:26:41Z)
• Stable Language Guidance for Vision-Language-Action Models [62.80963701282789]
  Residual Semantic Steering is a probabilistic framework that disentangles physical affordance from semantic execution.<n> RSS achieves state-of-the-art robustness, maintaining performance even under adversarial linguistic perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T16:16:10Z)
• GenTSE: Enhancing Target Speaker Extraction via a Coarse-to-Fine Generative Language Model [35.12859489567766]
  We present GenTSE, a two-stage decoder-only generative LM approach for TSE.<n> separating semantics and acoustics stabilizes decoding and yields more faithful, content-aligned target speech.<n>Experiments on Libri2Mix show that GenTSE surpasses previous LM-based systems in speech quality, intelligibility, and speaker consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T06:13:02Z)
• Principled RL for Diffusion LLMs Emerges from a Sequence-Level Perspective [85.06838178922791]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has proven highly effective for autoregressive language models.<n>But adapting these methods to diffusion large language models (dLLMs) presents fundamental challenges.<n>We propose a principled RL framework that treats entire sequence generation as a single action and uses the ELBO as a tractable sequence-level likelihood proxy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T13:05:32Z)
• Detoxifying Large Language Models via Autoregressive Reward Guided Representation Editing [77.75609817898035]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across various tasks, yet they remain vulnerable to generating toxic content.<n>We propose textscAutoregressive textscReward textscGuided textscRe presentation textscEditing (ARGRE)<n>ARGRE explicitly models toxicity transitions within the latent representation space, enabling stable and precise reward-guided editing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T03:40:32Z)
• T2I-Eval-R1: Reinforcement Learning-Driven Reasoning for Interpretable Text-to-Image Evaluation [60.620408007636016]
  We propose T2I-Eval-R1, a novel reinforcement learning framework that trains open-source MLLMs using only coarse-grained quality scores.<n>Our approach integrates Group Relative Policy Optimization into the instruction-tuning process, enabling models to generate both scalar scores and interpretable reasoning chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T13:44:59Z)
• d1: Scaling Reasoning in Diffusion Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning [31.531278643184656]
  Recent large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities that benefits from online reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We propose d1, a framework to adapt pre-trained masked dLLMs into reasoning models via a combination of supervised finetuning (SFT) and RL.<n>We find that d1 yields the best performance and significantly improves performance of a state-of-the-art dLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T16:08:45Z)
• Unified Enhancement of the Generalization and Robustness of Language Models via Bi-Stage Optimization [2.502393972789905]
  We propose a bi-stage optimization framework to uniformly enhance both the generalization and robustness of LMs.<n>We show that our method significantly improves the generalization and robustness of LMs compared to other existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T13:50:36Z)
• EAGER-LLM: Enhancing Large Language Models as Recommenders through Exogenous Behavior-Semantic Integration [60.47645731801866]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly leveraged as foundational backbones in advanced recommender systems.<n>LLMs are pre-trained linguistic semantics but learn collaborative semantics from scratch via the llm-Backbone.<n>We propose EAGER-LLM, a decoder-only generative recommendation framework that integrates endogenous and endogenous behavioral and semantic information in a non-intrusive manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T17:01:57Z)
• Large Language Models can be Strong Self-Detoxifiers [82.6594169242814]
  Self-disciplined Autoregressive Sampling (SASA) is a lightweight controlled decoding algorithm for toxicity reduction of large language models (LLMs) SASA tracks the margin of the current output to steer the generation away from the toxic subspace, by adjusting the autoregressive sampling strategy. evaluated on LLMs of different scale and nature, namely Llama-3.1-Instruct (8B), Llama-2 (7B), and GPT2-L models with the RealToxicityPrompts, BOLD, and AttaQ benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T17:45:15Z)
• Gaining Wisdom from Setbacks: Aligning Large Language Models via Mistake Analysis [127.85293480405082]
  The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has not only provided numerous opportunities but also presented significant challenges. Existing alignment methods usually direct LLMs toward the favorable outcomes by utilizing human-annotated, flawless instruction-response pairs. This study proposes a novel alignment technique based on mistake analysis, which deliberately exposes LLMs to erroneous content to learn the reasons for mistakes and how to avoid them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T14:59:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.