The Anatomy of a Successful Student Scrum Team: Motivation, Personalities, and Academic Adaptation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03364v1
- Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2026 19:04:44 GMT
- Title: The Anatomy of a Successful Student Scrum Team: Motivation, Personalities, and Academic Adaptation
- Authors: Nadia Damianova, Santiago Berrezueta-Guzman,
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a year-long case study of an eight-person student development team tasked with designing and implementing a virtual reality game.<n>We analyze how the team adapted Scrum practices to fit semester rhythms, exams, travel, and part-time availability, and how communication and coordination were maintained in a hybrid on-site/remote environment.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Agile methods, and Scrum in particular, are widely taught in software engineering education; however, there is limited empirical evidence on how these practices function in long-running, student-led projects under academic and hybrid work constraints. This paper presents a year-long case study of an eight-person student development team tasked with designing and implementing a virtual reality game that simulates a university campus and provides program-related educational content. We analyze how the team adapted Scrum practices (sprint structure, roles, backlog management) to fit semester rhythms, exams, travel, and part-time availability, and how communication and coordination were maintained in a hybrid on-site/remote environment. Using qualitative observations and artifacts from Discord, Notion, and GitHub, as well as contribution metrics and a custom communication effectiveness index (score: 0.76/1.00), we evaluate three dimensions: (1) the effectiveness of collaboration tools, (2) the impact of hybrid work on communication and productivity, and (3) the feasibility of aligning Scrum with academic timelines. Our findings show that (i) lightweight, tool-mediated coordination enabled stable progress even during remote periods; (ii) one-week sprints and flexible ceremonies helped reconcile Scrum with academic obligations; and (iii) shared motivation, role clarity, and compatible working styles were as critical as process mechanics. We propose practical recommendations for instructors and student teams adopting agile methods in hybrid, project-based learning settings.
Related papers
- Productivity and Collaboration in Hybrid Agile Teams: An Interview Study [0.9176056742068813]
This study investigate how hybrid settings influence productivity and collaboration through nine interviews with three Norwegian Agile teams.<n>Our findings show that hybrid work reduces informal interaction, creates uneven participation, and increases reliance on digital tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T10:22:25Z) - The impact of gamification on learning outcomes: experiences from a Biomedical Engineering course [0.4697971908036153]
This study examines the integration of digital tools in project-based learning within a Biomedical Engineering course.<n>Students highlighted increased engagement, enhanced teamwork, and clearer criteria for performance assessment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-07T16:28:07Z) - In-person, Online and Back Again -- A Tale of Three Hybrid Hackathons [88.07897892705796]
Hybrid hackathons combine in-person and online participation, presenting unique challenges for organizers and participants.<n>Existing strategies for in-person or online-only events often fail to address the challenges of hybrid formats.<n>Our work examines how hybrid hackathons function, analyzing how organizers structure these events and how participants navigate hybrid-specific challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-10T11:27:01Z) - How Soft Skills Shape First-Year Success in Higher Education [2.823770863747379]
Soft skills are critical for academic and professional success, but are often neglected in early-stage technical curricula.<n>This paper presents a semi-isolated teaching intervention aimed at fostering study ability and key soft skills-communication, collaboration, and project management.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T19:32:51Z) - Enhancing Collaboration Through Google Workspace: Assessing and Strengthening Current Practices [55.2480439325792]
The aim is to evaluate Google Workspace's role in enhancing blended learning practices at the University of Makati.<n>The study found that Google Workspace and rated as "Very Effective" (mean score of 4.61) in promoting teamwork.<n>It is recommended to enhance user adoption through targeted training and improve offline capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-15T11:18:25Z) - Code Collaborate: Dissecting Team Dynamics in First-Semester Programming Students [3.0294711465150006]
The study highlights the collaboration trends that emerge as first-semester students develop a 2D game project.
Results indicate that students often slightly overestimate their contributions, with more engaged individuals more likely to acknowledge mistakes.
Team performance shows no significant variation based on nationality or gender composition, though teams that disbanded frequently consisted of lone wolves.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T11:42:05Z) - Using Agile Story Points and Game Theory Together: Better Software Planning and Development in Agile Software Development [0.0]
This study integrates key concepts from Agile software development, Story Point estimation, and Game Theory.
We propose the application of game theoretic strategies, notably the Vickrey Auction and Stag Hunt Game.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-30T18:32:14Z) - Pre-training Multi-task Contrastive Learning Models for Scientific
Literature Understanding [52.723297744257536]
Pre-trained language models (LMs) have shown effectiveness in scientific literature understanding tasks.
We propose a multi-task contrastive learning framework, SciMult, to facilitate common knowledge sharing across different literature understanding tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T16:47:22Z) - Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization
benchmarks [67.29240500171532]
Benchopt is a framework to automate, reproduce and publish optimization benchmarks in machine learning.
Benchopt simplifies benchmarking for the community by providing an off-the-shelf tool for running, sharing and extending experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-27T16:19:24Z) - Learning Multi-Objective Curricula for Deep Reinforcement Learning [55.27879754113767]
Various automatic curriculum learning (ACL) methods have been proposed to improve the sample efficiency and final performance of deep reinforcement learning (DRL)
In this paper, we propose a unified automatic curriculum learning framework to create multi-objective but coherent curricula.
In addition to existing hand-designed curricula paradigms, we further design a flexible memory mechanism to learn an abstract curriculum.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-06T19:30:25Z) - Who does what? Work division and allocation strategies of computer
science student teams [5.863264019032882]
The aim of this research is to gain insight into the work division and allocation strategies applied by computer science students during group assignments.
Motivated primarily by grade and efficiency factors, students choose and allocate tasks based on their prior expertise and preferences.
Based on our findings, we argue that the setup of group assignments can limit student motivation for practicing new software engineering skills.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-04T12:27:07Z) - Towards Coordinated Robot Motions: End-to-End Learning of Motion
Policies on Transform Trees [63.31965375413414]
We propose to solve multi-task problems through learning structured policies from human demonstrations.
Our structured policy is inspired by RMPflow, a framework for combining subtask policies on different spaces.
We derive an end-to-end learning objective function that is suitable for the multi-task problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-24T22:46:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.