Productivity and Collaboration in Hybrid Agile Teams: An Interview Study
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22835v1
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 10:22:25 GMT
- Title: Productivity and Collaboration in Hybrid Agile Teams: An Interview Study
- Authors: Elisabeth Mo, Jefferson Seide Molléri, Asle Fagerstrøm,
- Abstract summary: This study investigate how hybrid settings influence productivity and collaboration through nine interviews with three Norwegian Agile teams.<n>Our findings show that hybrid work reduces informal interaction, creates uneven participation, and increases reliance on digital tools.
- Score: 0.9176056742068813
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Hybrid work has become a reality post-pandemic, transforming how Agile teams deliver value, collaborate, and adapt. This study investigate how hybrid settings influence productivity and collaboration through nine interviews with three Norwegian Agile teams. Our findings show that hybrid work reduces informal interaction, creates uneven participation, and increases reliance on digital tools. Agile ceremonies became alignment anchors, while trust, communication, and tool support mediate team effectiveness. Hybrid Agile work is an evolving field that requires tailored structures to support inclusion, team cohesion, and sustainable performance.
Related papers
- The Anatomy of a Successful Student Scrum Team: Motivation, Personalities, and Academic Adaptation [0.0]
This paper presents a year-long case study of an eight-person student development team tasked with designing and implementing a virtual reality game.<n>We analyze how the team adapted Scrum practices to fit semester rhythms, exams, travel, and part-time availability, and how communication and coordination were maintained in a hybrid on-site/remote environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T19:04:44Z) - In-person, Online and Back Again -- A Tale of Three Hybrid Hackathons [88.07897892705796]
Hybrid hackathons combine in-person and online participation, presenting unique challenges for organizers and participants.<n>Existing strategies for in-person or online-only events often fail to address the challenges of hybrid formats.<n>Our work examines how hybrid hackathons function, analyzing how organizers structure these events and how participants navigate hybrid-specific challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-10T11:27:01Z) - What Drives Team Success? Large-Scale Evidence on the Role of the Team Player Effect [0.0]
We analyze a large-scale dataset from the real-time strategy game Age of Empires II.<n>We find that certain individuals consistently improve team outcomes beyond what their technical skills predict.<n>Our results demonstrate that social skills and familiarity interact in a complementary, rather than additive, way.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-04T21:46:50Z) - Exploring Collaborative GenAI Agents in Synchronous Group Settings: Eliciting Team Perceptions and Design Considerations for the Future of Work [31.376737005894793]
We investigate the potential of collaborative GenAI agents to augment teamwork in synchronous group settings.<n>Our findings suggest that, if designed well, collaborative GenAI agents offer valuable opportunities to enhance team problem-solving.<n>However, teams' willingness to integrate GenAI agents depended on its perceived fit across a number of individual, team, and organizational factors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-21T00:38:02Z) - Don't lie to your friends: Learning what you know from collaborative self-play [63.0121884175594]
We propose a radically new approach to teaching AI agents what they know.<n>We construct multi-agent collaborations in which the group is rewarded for collectively arriving at correct answers.<n>The desired meta-knowledge emerges from the incentives built into the structure of the interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-18T17:53:20Z) - Hybrid Work in Agile Software Development: Recurring Meetings [5.931665251123055]
This study investigates how recurring meetings are organized and carried out in hybrid work in a large-scale agile environment.<n>A key insight from this study is that different types of meetings in agile software development should be primarily organized onsite or remotely.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-17T09:58:06Z) - Collaborative Gym: A Framework for Enabling and Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration [50.657070334404835]
Collaborative Gym is a framework enabling asynchronous, tripartite interaction among agents, humans, and task environments.<n>We instantiate Co-Gym with three representative tasks in both simulated and real-world conditions.<n>Our findings reveal that collaborative agents consistently outperform their fully autonomous counterparts in task performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-20T09:21:15Z) - Post-Pandemic Hybrid Work in Software Companies: Findings from an
Industrial Case Study [0.0]
Software professionals learned from their experience during the pandemic that most of their work can be done remotely.
Now software companies are expected to adopt hybrid work models to avoid the resignation of talented professionals.
However, there are no well-established hybrid work configurations to be followed in the post-pandemic period.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-17T02:08:37Z) - ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language
Models [89.53040828210945]
ProAgent is a novel framework that harnesses large language models to create proactive agents.
ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations.
ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various coordination scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-22T10:36:56Z) - AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring
Emergent Behaviors [93.38830440346783]
We propose a multi-agent framework framework that can collaboratively adjust its composition as a greater-than-the-sum-of-its-parts system.
Our experiments demonstrate that framework framework can effectively deploy multi-agent groups that outperform a single agent.
In view of these behaviors, we discuss some possible strategies to leverage positive ones and mitigate negative ones for improving the collaborative potential of multi-agent groups.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-21T16:47:11Z) - On Emergent Communication in Competitive Multi-Agent Teams [116.95067289206919]
We investigate whether competition for performance from an external, similar agent team could act as a social influence.
Our results show that an external competitive influence leads to improved accuracy and generalization, as well as faster emergence of communicative languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-04T01:14:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.