An Empirical Analysis of Community and Coding Patterns in OSS4SG vs. Conventional OSS

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03430v1
• Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2026 21:37:12 GMT
• Title: An Empirical Analysis of Community and Coding Patterns in OSS4SG vs. Conventional OSS
• Authors: Mohamed Ouf, Shayan Noei, Zeph Van Iterson, Mariam Guizani, Ying Zou,
• Abstract summary: Open Source Software for Social Good (OSS4SG) projects aim to address critical societal challenges.<n>We compare community structure, contributor engagement, and coding practices of OSS4SG and conventional OSS projects.<n>Our findings reveal that OSS4SG projects foster significantly more stable and "sticky" communities, whereas conventional OSS projects are more "magnetic" (75.4%), attracting a high turnover of contributors.
• Score: 1.6821922667774782
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Open Source Software for Social Good (OSS4SG) projects aim to address critical societal challenges, such as healthcare access and community safety. Understanding the community dynamics and contributor patterns in these projects is essential for ensuring their sustainability and long-term impact. However, while extensive research has focused on conventional Open Source Software (OSS), little is known about how the mission-driven nature of OSS4SG influences its development practices. To address this gap, we conduct a large-scale empirical study of 1,039 GitHub repositories, comprising 422 OSS4SG and 617 conventional OSS projects, to compare community structure, contributor engagement, and coding practices. Our findings reveal that OSS4SG projects foster significantly more stable and "sticky" (63.4%) communities, whereas conventional OSS projects are more "magnetic" (75.4%), attracting a high turnover of contributors. OSS4SG projects also demonstrate consistent engagement throughout the year, while conventional OSS communities exhibit seasonal fluctuations. Additionally, OSS4SG projects rely heavily on core contributors for both code quality and issue resolution, while conventional OSS projects leverage casual contributors for issue resolution, with core contributors focusing primarily on code quality.

Related papers

• BeyondSWE: Can Current Code Agent Survive Beyond Single-Repo Bug Fixing? [61.247730037229815]
  We introduce BeyondSWE, a comprehensive benchmark that broadens existing evaluations along two axes - resolution scope and knowledge scope.<n>To investigate the role of external knowledge, we develop SearchSWE, a framework that integrates deep search with coding abilities.<n>This work offers both a realistic, challenging evaluation benchmark and a flexible framework to advance research toward more capable code agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T17:52:01Z)
• Do Good, Stay Longer? Temporal Patterns and Predictors of Newcomer-to-Core Transitions in Conventional OSS and OSS4SG [3.2952032218821565]
  OSS4SG projects retain contributors at 2.2X higher rates and contributors have 19.6% higher probability of achieving core status.<n>Our findings suggest that finding a project aligned with personal values and taking time to understand the before major contributions are key strategies for achieving core status.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T16:30:25Z)
• Charting Uncertain Waters: A Socio-Technical Framework for Navigating GenAI's Impact on Open Source Communities [53.812795099349295]
  We conduct a scenario-driven, conceptual exploration using a socio-technical framework inspired by McLuhan's Tetrad to surface both risks and opportunities for community resilience amid GenAI-driven disruption of OSS development across four domains: software practices, documentation, community engagement, and governance.<n>By adopting this lens, OSS leaders and researchers can proactively shape the future of their ecosystems, rather than simply reacting to technological upheaval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T22:54:15Z)
• Myth: The loss of core developers is a critical issue for OSS communities [1.392008330500134]
  89% of studied projects have experienced losing their core development team at least once.<n>In 70% of cases, this project abandonment happens within the first three years of the project life.<n>Most OSS projects rely on a single core developer to maintain development activities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-30T01:47:59Z)
• An Overview and Catalogue of Dependency Challenges in Open Source Software Package Registries [52.23798016734889]
  This article provides a catalogue of dependency-related challenges that come with relying on OSS packages or libraries. The catalogue is based on the scientific literature on empirical research that has been conducted to understand, quantify and overcome these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T16:20:20Z)
• CROSS: A Contributor-Project Interaction Lifecycle Model for Open Source Software [2.9631016562930546]
  Cross model is a novel contributor-project interaction lifecycle model for open source software. It explains a range of archetypal cases of contributor engagement and highlights research gaps, especially in EoS/offboarding scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T17:57:12Z)
• On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Models [93.67389739906561]
  We focus on open foundation models, defined here as those with broadly available model weights. We identify five distinctive properties of open foundation models that lead to both their benefits and risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T16:49:53Z)
• Unveiling Diversity: Empowering OSS Project Leaders with Community Diversity and Turnover Dashboards [51.67585198094836]
  CommunityTapestry is a dynamic real-time community dashboard. It presents key diversity and turnover signals that we identified from the literature. It helped project leaders identify areas of improvement and gave them actionable information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T22:12:57Z)
• An Exploratory Study on the Evidence of Hackathons' Role in Solving OSS Newcomers' Challenges [54.56931759953522]
  We aim to understand and discuss the challenges newcomers face when joining an OSS project. We collect evidence on how hackathons were used to address those challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T15:40:19Z)
• Towards a Critical Open-Source Software Database [0.0]
  CrOSSD project aims to build a database of OSS projects and measure their current project "health" status. quantitative metrics will be gathered through automated crawling of meta information such as the number of contributors, commits and lines of code. qualitative metrics will be gathered for selected "critical" projects through manual analysis and automated tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T10:43:21Z)
• Leaving My Fingerprints: Motivations and Challenges of Contributing to OSS for Social Good [17.145094780239564]
  We conducted 21 semi-structured interviews with OSS for Social Good contributors. We find that the majority of contributors demonstrate a distinction between OSS4SG and OSS. OSS4SG contributors evaluate the owners of the project significantly more than OSS contributors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T21:50:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.