Quantum observers can communicate across multiverse branches

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08102v1
• Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:49:12 GMT
• Title: Quantum observers can communicate across multiverse branches
• Authors: Maria Violaris,
• Abstract summary: It is commonly thought that observers in distinct branches of an Everettian multiverse cannot communicate without violating the linearity of quantum theory.<n>Here we show a counterexample, demonstrating that inter-branch communication is in fact possible, entirely within standard quantum theory.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: It is commonly thought that observers in distinct branches of an Everettian multiverse cannot communicate without violating the linearity of quantum theory. Here we show a counterexample, demonstrating that inter-branch communication is in fact possible, entirely within standard quantum theory. We do this by considering a Wigner's-friend scenario, where an observer (Wigner) can have quantum control over another observer (the friend). We present a thought experiment where the friend in superposition can receive a message written by a distinct copy of themselves in the multiverse, with the aid of Wigner. To maintain the unitarity of quantum theory, the observers must have no memory of the message that they sent. Our thought experiment challenges conventional wisdom regarding the ultimate limits of what is possible in an Everettian multiverse. It has a surprising potential application which involves using knowledge-creation paradoxes for testing Everettian quantum theory against single-world theories.

Related papers

• Typical Quantum States of the Universe are Observationally Indistinguishable [0.0]
  We establish three new impossibility results regarding our knowledge of the quantum state of the universe.<n>We show that no observation can determine or just significantly narrow down which vector it is.<n>We also discuss how theoretical considerations beyond empirical evidence might inform our understanding of this fact and our knowledge of the universal quantum state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T09:59:57Z)
• A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
  We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
• On the significance of Wigner's Friend in contexts beyond quantum foundations [0.0]
  Wigner's Friend highlights a counterintuitive feature that is unique to quantum theory.<n>We argue that the gist of the Wigner's Friend paradox can be reproduced without assuming quantum physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T19:00:13Z)
• Relativistic Quantum Fields Are Universal Entanglement Embezzlers [41.94295877935867]
  Embezzlement of entanglement refers to the counterintuitive possibility of extracting entangled quantum states from a reference state of an auxiliary system.<n>We uncover a deep connection between the operational task of embezzling entanglement and the mathematical classification of von Neumann algebras.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-14T13:58:32Z)
• Bertlmann's socks from a Viennese perspective [0.0]
  A century after its inception, we are presented with a promising interpretive key, intimated by Wheeler as early as 1974. The interpretative paradoxes of this theory might be resolved if we discern the relationship between logical undecidability and quantum undecidability. It will be demonstrated how both are intricately linked to an observer/observed relational issue, and how the idiosyncratic behaviours of quantum physics can be reconciled with the normative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T06:49:19Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• Is there a finite complete set of monotones in any quantum resource theory? [39.58317527488534]
  We show that there does not exist a finite set of resource monotones which completely determines all state transformations. We show that totally ordered theories allow for free transformations between all pure states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T18:28:36Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)
• Quantum Immortality and Non-Classical Logic [0.0]
  The Everett Box is a device in which an observer and a lethal quantum apparatus are isolated from the rest of the universe. We show that although the standard Everett argument rejecting non-MWI interpretations is no longer valid, we can show that Everett's conclusion still holds within a computable universe.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-20T02:38:39Z)
• Quantum resource covariance [0.0]
  Since the dawn of quantum mechanics there is no consensus on what the theory is all about. We construct a theoretical framework within which a given combination of quantum resources is shown to be a Galilean invariant. We show that the notion of physical reality implied by quantum mechanics is not absolute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-19T17:34:11Z)
• A strong no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox [0.0]
  We prove that if quantum evolution is controllable on the scale of an observer, then one of 'No-Superdeterminism', 'Locality' or 'Absoluteness of Observed Events' must be false. We show that although the violation of Bell-type inequalities in such scenarios is not in general sufficient to demonstrate the contradiction between those three assumptions, new inequalities can be derived in a theory-independent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-12T08:09:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.