Inferring Latent Intentions: Attributional Natural Language Inference in LLM Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08742v1
• Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 17:18:38 GMT
• Title: Inferring Latent Intentions: Attributional Natural Language Inference in LLM Agents
• Authors: Xin Quan, Jiafeng Xiong, Marco Valentino, André Freitas,
• Abstract summary: Attributional inference is a critical yet underexplored capability for large language models.<n>We introduce Attributional NLI, a framework that extends NLI with principles from social psychology to assess an agent's capacity for abductive intentional inference.<n>Our results underscore the role that Att-NLI can play in developing agents with sophisticated reasoning capabilities.
• Score: 33.140424265055145
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Attributional inference, the ability to predict latent intentions behind observed actions, is a critical yet underexplored capability for large language models (LLMs) operating in multi-agent environments. Traditional natural language inference (NLI), in fact, fails to capture the nuanced, intention-driven reasoning essential for complex interactive systems. To address this gap, we introduce Attributional NLI (Att-NLI), a framework that extends NLI with principles from social psychology to assess an agent's capacity for abductive intentional inference (generating hypotheses about latent intentions), and subsequent deductive verification (drawing valid logical conclusions). We instantiate Att-NLI via a textual game, Undercover-V, experimenting with three types of LLM agents with varying reasoning capabilities and access to external tools: a standard NLI agent using only deductive inference, an Att-NLI agent employing abductive-deductive inference, and a neuro-symbolic Att-NLI agent performing abductive-deductive inference with external theorem provers. Extensive experiments demonstrate a clear hierarchy of attributional inference capabilities, with neuro-symbolic agents consistently outperforming others, achieving an average win rate of 17.08%. Our results underscore the role that Att-NLI can play in developing agents with sophisticated reasoning capabilities, highlighting, at the same time, the potential impact of neuro-symbolic AI in building rational LLM agents acting in multi-agent environments.

Related papers

• IROTE: Human-like Traits Elicitation of Large Language Model via In-Context Self-Reflective Optimization [66.6349183886101]
  We propose IROTE, a novel in-context method for stable and transferable trait elicitation.<n>We show that one single IROTE-generated self-reflection can induce LLMs' stable impersonation of the target trait across diverse downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T08:04:28Z)
• MIRAGE-Bench: LLM Agent is Hallucinating and Where to Find Them [52.764019220214344]
  Hallucinations pose critical risks for large language model (LLM)-based agents.<n>We present MIRAGE-Bench, the first unified benchmark for eliciting and evaluating hallucinations in interactive environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:38:29Z)
• AI Mother Tongue: Self-Emergent Communication in MARL via Endogenous Symbol Systems [0.0]
  We show that when agents possess an endogenous symbol system, their neural representations naturally exhibit spontaneous semantic compression and Nash equilibrium-driven semantic convergence.<n>This discovery offers new avenues for bridging symbolism and connectionism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T09:52:49Z)
• Truly Assessing Fluid Intelligence of Large Language Models through Dynamic Reasoning Evaluation [106.17986469245302]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capacities that mirror human-like thinking.<n>Existing reasoning benchmarks either focus on domain-specific knowledge (crystallized intelligence) or lack interpretability.<n>We propose DRE-Bench, a dynamic reasoning evaluation benchmark grounded in a hierarchical cognitive framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T09:01:08Z)
• Large Language Models as Theory of Mind Aware Generative Agents with Counterfactual Reflection [31.38516078163367]
  ToM-agent is designed to empower LLMs-based generative agents to simulate ToM in open-domain conversational interactions.<n>ToM-agent disentangles the confidence from mental states, facilitating the emulation of an agent's perception of its counterpart's mental states.<n>Our findings indicate that the ToM-agent can grasp the underlying reasons for their counterpart's behaviors beyond mere semantic-emotional supporting or decision-making based on common sense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-26T00:32:38Z)
• Hallucination Mitigation using Agentic AI Natural Language-Based Frameworks [0.0]
  Hallucinations remain a significant challenge in current Generative AI models.<n>This study investigates how orchestrating multiple Artificial Intelligent Agents can help mitigate such hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-19T11:19:25Z)
• IDEA: Enhancing the Rule Learning Ability of Large Language Model Agent through Induction, Deduction, and Abduction [3.961279440272764]
  We introduce RULEARN to assess the rule-learning abilities of large language models in interactive settings.<n>We propose IDEA, a novel reasoning framework that integrates the process of Induction, Deduction, and Abduction.<n>Our evaluation of the IDEA framework, which involves five representative LLMs, demonstrates significant improvements over the baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T23:37:07Z)
• Enhancing Ethical Explanations of Large Language Models through Iterative Symbolic Refinement [5.108863224378874]
  This paper investigates how hybrid neuro-symbolic techniques can enhance the logical validity and alignment of ethical explanations. We present an abductive-deductive framework named Logic-Explainer, which integrates Large Language Models with an external backward-chaining solver. An empirical analysis demonstrates that Logic-Explainer can improve explanations generated via in-context learning methods and Chain-of-Thought.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T16:39:51Z)
• Igniting Language Intelligence: The Hitchhiker's Guide From Chain-of-Thought Reasoning to Language Agents [80.5213198675411]
  Large language models (LLMs) have dramatically enhanced the field of language intelligence. LLMs leverage the intriguing chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning techniques, obliging them to formulate intermediate steps en route to deriving an answer. Recent research endeavors have extended CoT reasoning methodologies to nurture the development of autonomous language agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T14:30:55Z)
• Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis Refinement [92.61557711360652]
  Language models (LMs) often fall short on inductive reasoning, despite achieving impressive success on research benchmarks. We conduct a systematic study of the inductive reasoning capabilities of LMs through iterative hypothesis refinement. We reveal several discrepancies between the inductive reasoning processes of LMs and humans, shedding light on both the potentials and limitations of using LMs in inductive reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T17:51:10Z)
• Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervision [84.31474052176343]
  Recent AI-assistant agents, such as ChatGPT, rely on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with human annotations and reinforcement learning from human feedback to align the output with human intentions. This dependence can significantly constrain the true potential of AI-assistant agents due to the high cost of obtaining human supervision. We propose a novel approach called SELF-ALIGN, which combines principle-driven reasoning and the generative power of LLMs for the self-alignment of AI agents with minimal human supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T17:59:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.