Related papers: Segmentação Comportamental, Do Not Track e o desenvolvimento jurídico europeu e holandês

Segmentação Comportamental, Do Not Track e o desenvolvimento jurídico europeu e holandês

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09711v1
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 12:43:44 GMT
Title: Segmentação Comportamental, Do Not Track e o desenvolvimento jurídico europeu e holandês
Authors: Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius,
Abstract summary: Dutch law explicitly presumes that data protection law applies to behavioral targeting.<n>This means that companies have to comply with data protection law's fair information principles.
Score: 0.2262632497140704
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: This paper discusses legal developments in Europe and the Netherlands. Recent decisions show that European data protection law, or privacy law, applies to behavioral targeting in most cases. Dutch law explicitly presumes that data protection law applies to behavioral targeting. This means that companies have to comply with data protection law's fair information principles. For example, companies must refrain from secret or excessive data collection. Perhaps the principles could provide inspiration for future W3C projects. Could technology design foster fair information processing?

Related papers

AnnoCaseLaw: A Richly-Annotated Dataset For Benchmarking Explainable Legal Judgment Prediction [56.797874973414636]
AnnoCaseLaw is a first-of-its-kind dataset of 471 meticulously annotated U.S. Appeals Court negligence cases.<n>Our dataset lays the groundwork for more human-aligned, explainable Legal Judgment Prediction models.<n>Results demonstrate that LJP remains a formidable task, with application of legal precedent proving particularly difficult.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-28T19:14:48Z)
Navigating the United States Legislative Landscape on Voice Privacy: Existing Laws, Proposed Bills, Protection for Children, and Synthetic Data for AI [28.82435149220576]
This paper presents the state of the privacy legislation at the U.S. Congress. It outlines how voice data is considered as part of the legislation definition. It also reviews additional privacy protection for children.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T03:43:16Z)
SoK: The Gap Between Data Rights Ideals and Reality [42.769107967436945]
Do rights-based privacy laws effectively empower individuals over their data?<n>This paper scrutinizes these approaches by reviewing empirical studies, news articles, and blog posts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-03T21:52:51Z)
Foundation Models and Fair Use [96.04664748698103]
In the U.S. and other countries, copyrighted content may be used to build foundation models without incurring liability due to the fair use doctrine. In this work, we survey the potential risks of developing and deploying foundation models based on copyrighted content. We discuss technical mitigations that can help foundation models stay in line with fair use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T03:58:40Z)
Priorities for more effective tech regulation [3.8073142980733]
Report proposes a range of priorities for regulators, academia and the interested public in order to move beyond the status quo. Current legal practice will not be enough to meaningfully tame egregious data practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-27T16:53:05Z)
Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a 256GB Open-Source Legal Dataset [46.156169284961045]
We offer an approach to filtering grounded in law, which has directly addressed the tradeoffs in filtering material. First, we gather and make available the Pile of Law, a 256GB dataset of open-source English-language legal and administrative data. Second, we distill the legal norms that governments have developed to constrain the inclusion of toxic or private content into actionable lessons. Third, we show how the Pile of Law offers researchers the opportunity to learn such filtering rules directly from the data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-01T06:25:15Z)
"It may be a pain in the backside but..." Insights into the impact of GDPR on business after three years [2.5567566997688043]
General Data Protection Regulation ( Ireland) came into effect in May. Aim of study is to investigate if is all pain and no gain for business. We find threat threat fines has focused corporate mind and made business more privacy aware. Many implementation challenges remain. New business development and intra-company communication is more constrained.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-22T16:44:21Z)
Second layer data governance for permissioned blockchains: the privacy management challenge [58.720142291102135]
In pandemic situations, such as the COVID-19 and Ebola outbreak, the action related to sharing health data is crucial to avoid the massive infection and decrease the number of deaths. In this sense, permissioned blockchain technology emerges to empower users to get their rights providing data ownership, transparency, and security through an immutable, unified, and distributed database ruled by smart contracts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-22T13:19:38Z)
A vision for global privacy bridges: Technical and legal measures for international data markets [77.34726150561087]
Despite data protection laws and an acknowledged right to privacy, trading personal information has become a business equated with "trading oil" An open conflict is arising between business demands for data and a desire for privacy. We propose and test a vision of a personal information market with privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-13T13:55:50Z)
Beyond privacy regulations: an ethical approach to data usage in transportation [64.86110095869176]
We describe how Federated Machine Learning can be applied to the transportation sector. We see Federated Learning as a method that enables us to process privacy-sensitive data, while respecting customer's privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-01T15:10:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.