Can Deep Research Agents Find and Organize? Evaluating the Synthesis Gap with Expert Taxonomies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12369v1
• Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 11:57:09 GMT
• Title: Can Deep Research Agents Find and Organize? Evaluating the Synthesis Gap with Expert Taxonomies
• Authors: Ming Zhang, Jiabao Zhuang, Wenqing Jing, Ziyu Kong, Jingyi Deng, Yujiong Shen, Kexin Tan, Yuhang Zhao, Ning Luo, Renzhe Zheng, Jiahui Lin, Mingqi Wu, Long Ma, Yi Zou, Shihan Dou, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce TaxoBench, a diagnostic benchmark derived from 72 computer science surveys.<n>We manually extract expert-authored taxonomy trees containing 3,815 precisely categorized citations as ground truth.<n>Best agent recalls only 20.9% of expert-selected papers, and even with perfect input, the best model achieves only 0.31 ARI in organization.
• Score: 57.11324429385405
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep Research Agents are increasingly used for automated survey generation. However, whether they can write surveys like human experts remains unclear. Existing benchmarks focus on fluency or citation accuracy, but none evaluates the core capabilities: retrieving essential papers and organizing them into coherent knowledge structures. We introduce TaxoBench, a diagnostic benchmark derived from 72 highly-cited computer science surveys. We manually extract expert-authored taxonomy trees containing 3,815 precisely categorized citations as ground truth. Our benchmark supports two evaluation modes: Deep Research mode tests end-to-end retrieval and organization given only a topic, while Bottom-Up mode isolates structuring capability by providing the exact papers human experts used. We evaluate 7 leading Deep Research agents and 12 frontier LLMs. Results reveal a dual bottleneck: the best agent recalls only 20.9% of expert-selected papers, and even with perfect input, the best model achieves only 0.31 ARI in organization. Current deep research agents remain far from expert-level survey writing. Our benchmark is publicly available at https://github.com/KongLongGeFDU/TaxoBench.

Related papers

• AgentIR: Reasoning-Aware Retrieval for Deep Research Agents [76.29382561831105]
  Deep Research agents generate explicit natural language reasoning before each search call.<n> Reasoning-Aware Retrieval embeds the agent's reasoning trace alongside its query.<n>DR- Synth generates Deep Research retriever training data from standard QA datasets.<n>AgentIR-4B achieves 68% accuracy with the open-weight agent Tongyi-DeepResearch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T18:47:26Z)
• DeepResearch-9K: A Challenging Benchmark Dataset of Deep-Research Agent [63.52637950356965]
  DeepResearch-9K is a large-scale, challenging dataset for deep-research scenarios.<n>DeepResearch-R1 is an open-source training framework for deep-research agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T15:36:10Z)
• DeepResearch Bench II: Diagnosing Deep Research Agents via Rubrics from Expert Report [36.25273583677749]
  We introduce Deep Research Bench II, a new benchmark for evaluating deep-research systems.<n>For each task, a system must produce a long-form research report that is evaluated by a set of 9430 fine-grained binary rubrics.<n>We evaluate several state-of-the-art deep-research systems on Deep Research Bench II and find that even the strongest models satisfy fewer than 50% of the rubrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T13:18:39Z)
• Step-DeepResearch Technical Report [90.50586290399683]
  We introduce Step-DeepResearch, a cost-effective, end-to-end agent.<n>We propose a Data Synthesis Strategy Based on Atomic Capabilities to reinforce planning and report writing.<n>To bridge the evaluation gap in the Chinese domain, we establish ADR-Bench for realistic deep research scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T16:32:27Z)
• Dr.Mi-Bench: A Modular-integrated Benchmark for Scientific Deep Research Agent [52.876617746453995]
  Dr.Mi-Bench is a Modular-integrated benchmark for scientific deep research (DR) agents.<n>Dr.Mi-Eval is a novel modular-integrated evaluation paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-30T17:16:47Z)
• ReplicationBench: Can AI Agents Replicate Astrophysics Research Papers? [29.17900668495058]
  We introduce ReplicationBench, an evaluation framework for frontier AI agents.<n>It tests whether agents can replicate entire research papers drawn from the astrophysics literature.<n>R ReplicationBench establishes the first benchmark of paper-scale, expert-validated astrophysics research tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T16:21:19Z)
• DeepTRACE: Auditing Deep Research AI Systems for Tracking Reliability Across Citations and Evidence [50.97612134791782]
  Generative search engines and deep research LLM agents promise trustworthy, source-grounded synthesis, yet users regularly encounter overconfidence, weak sourcing, and confusing citation practices.<n>We introduce DeepTRACE, a novel sociotechnically grounded audit framework that turns prior community-identified failure cases into eight measurable dimensions spanning answer text, sources, and citations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T00:32:38Z)
• BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agent [74.10138164281618]
  BrowseComp-Plus is a benchmark derived from BrowseComp, employing a fixed, carefully curated corpus.<n>This benchmark allows comprehensive evaluation and disentangled analysis of deep research agents and retrieval methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T17:55:11Z)
• SciSage: A Multi-Agent Framework for High-Quality Scientific Survey Generation [2.985620880452744]
  SciSage is a multi-agent framework employing a reflect-when-you-write paradigm.<n>It critically evaluates drafts at outline, section, and document levels, collaborating with specialized agents for query interpretation, content retrieval, and refinement.<n>We also release SurveyScope, a benchmark of 46 high-impact papers ( 2020-2025) across 11 computer science domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-15T02:23:47Z)
• DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents [30.768405850755602]
  DeepResearch Bench is a benchmark consisting of 100 PhD-level research tasks.<n> evaluating Deep Research Agents is inherently complex and labor-intensive.<n>We propose two novel methodologies that achieve strong alignment with human judgment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T13:17:32Z)
• PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research [3.4567792239799133]
  PaperBench is a benchmark evaluating the ability of AI agents to replicate state-of-the-art AI research.<n>Agents must replicate 20 ICML 2024 Spotlight and Oral papers from scratch.<n>PaperBench contains 8,316 individually gradable tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T15:55:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.