Bridging the Knowledge-Action Gap by Evaluating LLMs in Dynamic Dental Clinical Scenarios

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12974v1
• Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 11:36:39 GMT
• Title: Bridging the Knowledge-Action Gap by Evaluating LLMs in Dynamic Dental Clinical Scenarios
• Authors: Hongyang Ma, Tiantian Gu, Huaiyuan Sun, Huilin Zhu, Yongxin Wang, Jie Li, Wubin Sun, Zeliang Lian, Yinghong Zhou, Yi Gao, Shirui Wang, Zhihui Tang,
• Abstract summary: The transition of Large Language Models (LLMs) from passive knowledge retrievers to autonomous clinical agents demands a shift in evaluation-from static accuracy to dynamic behavioral reliability.<n>This study empirically charts the capability boundaries of dental LLMs, providing a roadmap for bridging the gap between standardized knowledge and safe, autonomous clinical practice.
• Score: 9.865786198063644
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The transition of Large Language Models (LLMs) from passive knowledge retrievers to autonomous clinical agents demands a shift in evaluation-from static accuracy to dynamic behavioral reliability. To explore this boundary in dentistry, a domain where high-quality AI advice uniquely empowers patient-participatory decision-making, we present the Standardized Clinical Management & Performance Evaluation (SCMPE) benchmark, which comprehensively assesses performance from knowledge-oriented evaluations (static objective tasks) to workflow-based simulations (multi-turn simulated patient interactions). Our analysis reveals that while models demonstrate high proficiency in static objective tasks, their performance precipitates in dynamic clinical dialogues, identifying that the primary bottleneck lies not in knowledge retention, but in the critical challenges of active information gathering and dynamic state tracking. Mapping "Guideline Adherence" versus "Decision Quality" reveals a prevalent "High Efficacy, Low Safety" risk in general models. Furthermore, we quantify the impact of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). While RAG mitigates hallucinations in static tasks, its efficacy in dynamic workflows is limited and heterogeneous, sometimes causing degradation. This underscores that external knowledge alone cannot bridge the reasoning gap without domain-adaptive pre-training. This study empirically charts the capability boundaries of dental LLMs, providing a roadmap for bridging the gap between standardized knowledge and safe, autonomous clinical practice.

Related papers

• A Unified XAI-LLM Approach for EndotrachealSuctioning Activity Recognition [0.1794226570005898]
  This study proposes a unified framework for video-based activity recognition benchmarked against conventional machine learning and deep learning approaches.<n>Within this framework, the Large Language Model (LLM) serves as the central reasoning module, performing bothtemporal activity recognition and explainable decision analysis from video data.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed LLM-based approach outperforms baseline models, achieving an improvement of approximately 15-20% in both accuracy and F1 score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T14:46:48Z)
• ClinDEF: A Dynamic Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models in Clinical Reasoning [58.01333341218153]
  We propose ClinDEF, a dynamic framework for assessing clinical reasoning in LLMs through simulated diagnostic dialogues.<n>Our method generates patient cases and facilitates multi-turn interactions between an LLM-based doctor and an automated patient agent.<n>Experiments show that ClinDEF effectively exposes critical clinical reasoning gaps in state-of-the-art LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T12:58:58Z)
• Causal Reinforcement Learning based Agent-Patient Interaction with Clinical Domain Knowledge [3.2434118923825483]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) faces significant challenges in adaptive healthcare interventions, such as dementia care, where data is scarce.<n>We present a novel framework called Causal structure-aware Reinforcement Learning (CRL) that explicitly integrates causal discovery and reasoning into policy optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T22:38:03Z)
• Exploring Membership Inference Vulnerabilities in Clinical Large Language Models [42.52690697965999]
  We present an exploratory empirical study on membership inference vulnerabilities in clinical large language models (LLMs)<n>Using a state-of-the-art clinical question-answering model, Llemr, we evaluate both canonical loss-based attacks and a domain-motivated paraphrasing-based perturbation strategy.<n>Results motivate continued development of context-aware, domain-specific privacy evaluations and defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T14:27:48Z)
• Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence for rare-event recognition: principles and pharmacovigilance case studies [0.0]
  High-stakes AI applications target low-prevalence events, where apparent accuracy can conceal limited real-world value.<n>We outline key considerations for critical appraisal of AI in rare-event recognition.<n>We instantiate the framework in pharmacovigilance, drawing on three studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T20:05:38Z)
• Are Large Language Models Dynamic Treatment Planners? An In Silico Study from a Prior Knowledge Injection Angle [3.0391297540732545]
  We evaluate large language models (LLMs) as dynamic insulin dosing agents in an in silico Type 1 diabetes simulator.<n>Our results indicate that carefully designed zero-shot prompts enable smaller LLMs to achieve comparable or superior clinical performance.<n>LLMs exhibit notable limitations, such as overly aggressive insulin dosing when prompted with chain-of-thought.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T13:46:02Z)
• Beyond Benchmarks: Dynamic, Automatic And Systematic Red-Teaming Agents For Trustworthy Medical Language Models [87.66870367661342]
  Large language models (LLMs) are used in AI applications in healthcare.<n>Red-teaming framework that continuously stress-test LLMs can reveal significant weaknesses in four safety-critical domains.<n>A suite of adversarial agents is applied to autonomously mutate test cases, identify/evolve unsafe-triggering strategies, and evaluate responses.<n>Our framework delivers an evolvable, scalable, and reliable safeguard for the next generation of medical AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T08:44:22Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Expert Control: Enhancing the Reliability of Medical Vision-Language Models [52.2001050216955]
  Existing methods aim to enhance the performance of Medical Vision Language Model (MedVLM) by adjusting model structure, fine-tuning with high-quality data, or through preference fine-tuning.<n>We propose an expert-in-the-loop framework named Expert-Controlled-Free Guidance (Expert-CFG) to align MedVLM with clinical expertise without additional training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T09:03:30Z)
• KIEval: A Knowledge-grounded Interactive Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models [53.84677081899392]
  KIEval is a Knowledge-grounded Interactive Evaluation framework for large language models. It incorporates an LLM-powered "interactor" role for the first time to accomplish a dynamic contamination-resilient evaluation. Extensive experiments on seven leading LLMs across five datasets validate KIEval's effectiveness and generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T01:30:39Z)
• TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
  Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment. In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials. We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z)
• Pruning the Way to Reliable Policies: A Multi-Objective Deep Q-Learning Approach to Critical Care [46.2482873419289]
  We introduce a deep Q-learning approach to obtain more reliable critical care policies. We evaluate our method in off-policy and offline settings using simulated environments and real health records from intensive care units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T18:02:57Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.