Pixelwise Uncertainty Quantification of Accelerated MRI Reconstruction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13236v1
• Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 17:12:28 GMT
• Title: Pixelwise Uncertainty Quantification of Accelerated MRI Reconstruction
• Authors: Ilias I. Giannakopoulos, Lokesh B Gautham Muthukumar, Yvonne W. Lui, Riccardo Lattanzi,
• Abstract summary: In clinical practice, conservative acceleration factors are chosen because no mechanism exists to automatically assess the diagnostic quality of undersampled reconstructions.<n>This work introduces a general framework for pixel-wise uncertainty quantification in parallel MRI reconstructions.<n>Our method integrates conformal quantile regression with image reconstruction methods to estimate statistically rigorous pixel-wise uncertainty intervals.
• Score: 0.06293060987473524
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Parallel imaging techniques reduce magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan time but image quality degrades as the acceleration factor increases. In clinical practice, conservative acceleration factors are chosen because no mechanism exists to automatically assess the diagnostic quality of undersampled reconstructions. This work introduces a general framework for pixel-wise uncertainty quantification in parallel MRI reconstructions, enabling automatic identification of unreliable regions without access to any ground-truth reference image. Our method integrates conformal quantile regression with image reconstruction methods to estimate statistically rigorous pixel-wise uncertainty intervals. We trained and evaluated our model on Cartesian undersampled brain and knee data obtained from the fastMRI dataset using acceleration factors ranging from 2 to 10. An end-to-end Variational Network was used for image reconstruction. Quantitative experiments demonstrate strong agreement between predicted uncertainty maps and true reconstruction error. Using our method, the corresponding Pearson correlation coefficient was higher than 90% at acceleration levels at and above four-fold; whereas it dropped to less than 70% when the uncertainty was computed using a simpler a heuristic notion (magnitude of the residual). Qualitative examples further show the uncertainty maps based on quantile regression capture the magnitude and spatial distribution of reconstruction errors across acceleration factors, with regions of elevated uncertainty aligning with pathologies and artifacts. The proposed framework enables evaluation of reconstruction quality without access to fully-sampled ground-truth reference images. It represents a step toward adaptive MRI acquisition protocols that may be able to dynamically balance scan time and diagnostic reliability.

Related papers

• CUTE-MRI: Conformalized Uncertainty-based framework for Time-adaptivE MRI [1.0209145746316146]
  This work introduces a dynamic, uncertainty-aware acquisition framework that adjusts scan time on a per-subject basis.<n>We use conformal prediction to transform this uncertainty into a rigorous, calibrated confidence interval for the metric.<n>Our results demonstrate that this adaptive approach reduces scan times compared to fixed protocols while providing formal statistical guarantees on the precision of the final image.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T14:56:42Z)
• Evaluating structural uncertainty in accelerated MRI: are voxelwise measures useful surrogates? [1.8124328823188356]
  We show that voxel level uncertainty does not provide insight into morphological uncertainty.<n>We use segmentation as a clinically-relevant downstream task and deploy ensembles of reconstruction modes to measure uncertainty in the reconstructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T16:34:22Z)
• A Unified Model for Compressed Sensing MRI Across Undersampling Patterns [69.19631302047569]
  We propose a unified MRI reconstruction model robust to various measurement undersampling patterns and image resolutions.<n>Our model improves SSIM by 11% and PSNR by 4 dB over a state-of-the-art CNN (End-to-End VarNet) with 600$times$ faster inference than diffusion methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T20:03:57Z)
• Attention-aware non-rigid image registration for accelerated MR imaging [10.47044784972188]
  We introduce an attention-aware deep learning-based framework that can perform non-rigid pairwise registration for fully sampled and accelerated MRI. We extract local visual representations to build similarity maps between the registered image pairs at multiple resolution levels. We demonstrate that our model derives reliable and consistent motion fields across different sampling trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T14:25:07Z)
• IMJENSE: Scan-specific Implicit Representation for Joint Coil Sensitivity and Image Estimation in Parallel MRI [11.159664312706704]
  IMJENSE is a scan-specific implicit neural representation-based method for improving parallel MRI reconstruction. Benefiting from the powerful continuous representation and joint estimation of the MRI image and coil sensitivities, IMJENSE outperforms conventional image or k-space domain reconstruction algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T07:24:11Z)
• PixCUE -- Joint Uncertainty Estimation and Image Reconstruction in MRI using Deep Pixel Classification [0.0]
  We introduce a method to estimate uncertainty during MRI reconstruction using a pixel classification framework. We demonstrate that this approach generates uncertainty maps that highly correlate with the reconstruction errors. We conclude that PixCUE is capable of reliably estimating the uncertainty in MRI reconstruction with a minimum additional computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T22:26:18Z)
• Stable Deep MRI Reconstruction using Generative Priors [13.400444194036101]
  We propose a novel deep neural network based regularizer which is trained in a generative setting on reference magnitude images only. The results demonstrate competitive performance, on par with state-of-the-art end-to-end deep learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T08:34:29Z)
• Automated SSIM Regression for Detection and Quantification of Motion Artefacts in Brain MR Images [54.739076152240024]
  Motion artefacts in magnetic resonance brain images are a crucial issue. The assessment of MR image quality is fundamental before proceeding with the clinical diagnosis. An automated image quality assessment based on the structural similarity index (SSIM) regression has been proposed here.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T10:16:54Z)
• Negligible effect of brain MRI data preprocessing for tumor segmentation [36.89606202543839]
  We conduct experiments on three publicly available datasets and evaluate the effect of different preprocessing steps in deep neural networks. Our results demonstrate that most popular standardization steps add no value to the network performance. We suggest that image intensity normalization approaches do not contribute to model accuracy because of the reduction of signal variance with image standardization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T17:29:36Z)
• Image-to-Image Regression with Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification and Applications in Imaging [88.20869695803631]
  We show how to derive uncertainty intervals around each pixel that are guaranteed to contain the true value. We evaluate our procedure on three image-to-image regression tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T18:59:56Z)
• Adaptive Gradient Balancing for UndersampledMRI Reconstruction and Image-to-Image Translation [60.663499381212425]
  We enhance the image quality by using a Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network combined with a novel Adaptive Gradient Balancing technique. In MRI, our method minimizes artifacts, while maintaining a high-quality reconstruction that produces sharper images than other techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-05T13:05:22Z)
• Towards Ultrafast MRI via Extreme k-Space Undersampling and Superresolution [65.25508348574974]
  We go below the MRI acceleration factors reported by all published papers that reference the original fastMRI challenge. We consider powerful deep learning based image enhancement methods to compensate for the underresolved images. The quality of the reconstructed images surpasses that of the other methods, yielding an MSE of 0.00114, a PSNR of 29.6 dB, and an SSIM of 0.956 at x16 acceleration factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-04T10:45:01Z)
• Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation of Learned Variational MRI Reconstruction [63.202627467245584]
  We introduce a Bayesian variational framework to quantify the model-immanent (epistemic) uncertainty. We demonstrate that our approach yields competitive results for undersampled MRI reconstruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T18:08:14Z)
• Improved Slice-wise Tumour Detection in Brain MRIs by Computing Dissimilarities between Latent Representations [68.8204255655161]
  Anomaly detection for Magnetic Resonance Images (MRIs) can be solved with unsupervised methods. We have proposed a slice-wise semi-supervised method for tumour detection based on the computation of a dissimilarity function in the latent space of a Variational AutoEncoder. We show that by training the models on higher resolution images and by improving the quality of the reconstructions, we obtain results which are comparable with different baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-24T14:02:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.