CUTE-MRI: Conformalized Uncertainty-based framework for Time-adaptivE MRI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14952v1
• Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 14:56:42 GMT
• Title: CUTE-MRI: Conformalized Uncertainty-based framework for Time-adaptivE MRI
• Abstract summary: This work introduces a dynamic, uncertainty-aware acquisition framework that adjusts scan time on a per-subject basis.<n>We use conformal prediction to transform this uncertainty into a rigorous, calibrated confidence interval for the metric.<n>Our results demonstrate that this adaptive approach reduces scan times compared to fixed protocols while providing formal statistical guarantees on the precision of the final image.
• Score: 1.0209145746316146
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) offers unparalleled soft-tissue contrast but is fundamentally limited by long acquisition times. While deep learning-based accelerated MRI can dramatically shorten scan times, the reconstruction from undersampled data introduces ambiguity resulting from an ill-posed problem with infinitely many possible solutions that propagates to downstream clinical tasks. This uncertainty is usually ignored during the acquisition process as acceleration factors are often fixed a priori, resulting in scans that are either unnecessarily long or of insufficient quality for a given clinical endpoint. This work introduces a dynamic, uncertainty-aware acquisition framework that adjusts scan time on a per-subject basis. Our method leverages a probabilistic reconstruction model to estimate image uncertainty, which is then propagated through a full analysis pipeline to a quantitative metric of interest (e.g., patellar cartilage volume or cardiac ejection fraction). We use conformal prediction to transform this uncertainty into a rigorous, calibrated confidence interval for the metric. During acquisition, the system iteratively samples k-space, updates the reconstruction, and evaluates the confidence interval. The scan terminates automatically once the uncertainty meets a user-predefined precision target. We validate our framework on both knee and cardiac MRI datasets. Our results demonstrate that this adaptive approach reduces scan times compared to fixed protocols while providing formal statistical guarantees on the precision of the final image. This framework moves beyond fixed acceleration factors, enabling patient-specific acquisitions that balance scan efficiency with diagnostic confidence, a critical step towards personalized and resource-efficient MRI.

Related papers

• Evaluating and Calibrating Diffusion Model-derived Uncertainty for Quantitative MRI Mapping [0.504092226811181]
  Evaluation on synthetic test data assessed error-awareness, high-error detection, selective prediction, and Gaussian interval calibration.<n> Diffusion model-derived uncertainty was positively associated with the mapping error.<n>Raw uncertainty was poorly calibrated for quantitative interval interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T11:30:31Z)
• Self-Auditing Residual Drifting for Pathology-Preserving Accelerated Knee MRI [5.844079330191764]
  SA-RDM-DC is a Self-Auditing Residual generative Drifting Model with Data Consistency for accelerated knee MRI.<n>It predicts image- and missing-k-space residual corrections, enforces data consistency with acquired k-space, uses frequency-aware and residual drifting supervision to recover fine detail.<n>It produces dense error maps and slice-level risk scores in the same inference pass.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T16:59:03Z)
• Information-Theoretic Optimization for Task-Adapted Compressed Sensing Magnetic Resonance Imaging [92.90858286761515]
  Task-adapted compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging (CS-MRI) is emerging to address the specific demands of downstream clinical tasks.<n>We propose the first task-adapted CS-MRI from the information-theoretic perspective to simultaneously achieve probabilistic inference for uncertainty prediction.<n>We leverage amortized optimization and construct tractable variational bounds for mutual information to jointly optimize sampling, reconstruction, and task-inference models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T13:23:19Z)
• Delving Aleatoric Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentation via Vision Foundation Models [56.29123284262618]
  This work proposes leveraging the universal representation capabilities of visual foundation models to estimate inherent data uncertainty.<n>We analyze the feature diversity of the model's decoded representations and quantify their singular value energy to define the semantic perception scale for each class.<n>Based on this foundation, we design two uncertainty-driven application strategies: (1) the aleatoric uncertainty-aware data filtering mechanism to eliminate potentially noisy samples and enhance model learning quality; and (2) the dynamic uncertainty-aware optimization strategy that adaptively adjusts class-specific loss weights during training based on the semantic perception scale, combined with a label denoising mechanism to improve training stability
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T03:59:54Z)
• Pixelwise Uncertainty Quantification of Accelerated MRI Reconstruction [0.06293060987473524]
  In clinical practice, conservative acceleration factors are chosen because no mechanism exists to automatically assess the diagnostic quality of undersampled reconstructions.<n>This work introduces a general framework for pixel-wise uncertainty quantification in parallel MRI reconstructions.<n>Our method integrates conformal quantile regression with image reconstruction methods to estimate statistically rigorous pixel-wise uncertainty intervals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T17:12:28Z)
• Metrics that matter: Evaluating image quality metrics for medical image generation [48.85783422900129]
  This study comprehensively assesses commonly used no-reference image quality metrics using brain MRI data.<n>We evaluate metric sensitivity to a range of challenges, including noise, distribution shifts, and, critically, morphological alterations designed to mimic clinically relevant inaccuracies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T01:57:25Z)
• Evaluating structural uncertainty in accelerated MRI: are voxelwise measures useful surrogates? [1.8124328823188356]
  We show that voxel level uncertainty does not provide insight into morphological uncertainty.<n>We use segmentation as a clinically-relevant downstream task and deploy ensembles of reconstruction modes to measure uncertainty in the reconstructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T16:34:22Z)
• L-FUSION: Laplacian Fetal Ultrasound Segmentation & Uncertainty Estimation [6.626853161057203]
  L-fusion is a framework that integrates uncertainty quantification through unsupervised, normative learning and large-scale foundation models.<n>It achieves reliable abnormality quantification for instant diagnostic feedback.<n>It improves uncertainty interpretation and removes the need for manual disease-labelling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T08:57:38Z)
• ContextMRI: Enhancing Compressed Sensing MRI through Metadata Conditioning [51.26601171361753]
  We propose ContextMRI, a text-conditioned diffusion model for MRI that integrates granular metadata into the reconstruction process.<n>We show that increasing the fidelity of metadata, ranging from slice location and contrast to patient age, sex, and pathology, systematically boosts reconstruction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T05:15:43Z)
• A Unified Model for Compressed Sensing MRI Across Undersampling Patterns [69.19631302047569]
  We propose a unified MRI reconstruction model robust to various measurement undersampling patterns and image resolutions.<n>Our model improves SSIM by 11% and PSNR by 4 dB over a state-of-the-art CNN (End-to-End VarNet) with 600$times$ faster inference than diffusion methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T20:03:57Z)
• Task-Driven Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse Problems via Conformal Prediction [11.393603788068777]
  In imaging inverse problems, one seeks to recover an image from missing/corrupted measurements. Motivated by applications where the recovered image is used for a downstream task, we propose a task-centered approach to uncertainty quantification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T18:49:17Z)
• Deep-learning-based acceleration of MRI for radiotherapy planning of pediatric patients with brain tumors [39.58317527488534]
  We developed a deep learning-based method for MRI reconstruction from undersampled data acquired with RT-specific receiver coil arrangements. DeepMRIRec reduced scanning time by a factor of four producing a structural similarity score surpassing the evaluated state-of-the-art method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T16:01:44Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning Based Segmentation: A Post-Hoc Approach for Left Ventricle Volume Estimation in MRI [0.0]
  Left ventricular (LV) volume estimation is critical for valid diagnosis and management of various cardiovascular conditions.<n>Recent machine learning advancements, particularly U-Net-like convolutional networks, have facilitated automated segmentation for medical images.<n>This study proposes a novel methodology for post-hoc uncertainty estimation in LV volume prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T13:44:55Z)
• Temporal Uncertainty Localization to Enable Human-in-the-loop Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Cardiac MRI Datasets [0.2871849986181679]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown promise for analyzing DCE-CMRI datasets. We propose a new space-time uncertainty metric as a dQC tool for DNN-based segmentation of free-breathing DCE-CMRI datasets. Our results suggest that the proposed dQC framework has the potential to accurately identify poor-quality segmentations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T16:55:30Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by utilizing Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [52.03490691733464]
  We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks. By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for the problem of medical image segmentation. DeviS incorporates an uncertainty-aware filtering module, which utilizes the metric of uncertainty-calibrated error to filter reliable data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z)
• Phase Aberration Robust Beamformer for Planewave US Using Self-Supervised Learning [41.10604715789614]
  We propose a novel self-supervised 3D CNN that enables phase aberration robust plane-wave imaging. Our approach is unique in that the network is trained in a self-supervised manner to robustly generate a high-quality image from various phase aberrated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-16T12:17:01Z)
• Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation of Learned Variational MRI Reconstruction [63.202627467245584]
  We introduce a Bayesian variational framework to quantify the model-immanent (epistemic) uncertainty. We demonstrate that our approach yields competitive results for undersampled MRI reconstruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T18:08:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.