Human Simulation Computation: A Human-Inspired Framework for Adaptive AI Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13887v2
• Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 02:40:52 GMT
• Title: Human Simulation Computation: A Human-Inspired Framework for Adaptive AI Systems
• Authors: Hong Su,
• Abstract summary: Human Computation Simulation (HSC) models intelligence as a continuous, closed-loop process involving thinking, action, learning, reflection, and activity scheduling.<n> HSC incorporates commonly used human thinking strategies across all stages of the internal reasoning process.<n>Through theoretical analysis, we argue that human simulation strategies cannot be fully learned from language material alone.
• Score: 0.11844977816228043
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in knowledge representation and reasoning based on textual data. However, their reliance on language material alone limits their ability to adapt, verify reasoning outcomes, and operate effectively in open and dynamic real-world environments. In this paper, we propose Human Simulation Computation (HSC), a human-inspired computational framework that models intelligence as a continuous, closed-loop process involving thinking, action, learning, reflection, and activity scheduling, collectively referred to as the internal reasoning process. HSC emphasizes active participation both within the internal reasoning process and in interactions with the environment, where actions are used not only to achieve goals but also to automatically refine and improve internal reasoning mechanisms without external intervention. Furthermore, HSC incorporates commonly used human thinking strategies across all stages of the internal reasoning process, such as main-feature-oriented reasoning, scope expansion through action, and on-time learning driven by environmental feedback. Through theoretical analysis, we argue that human simulation strategies cannot be fully learned from language material alone, and that human-like reasoning processes and action-grounded reasoning methods are essential for robust adaptation and effective interaction with real-world environments.

Related papers

• A testable framework for AI alignment: Simulation Theology as an engineered worldview for silicon-based agents [0.0]
  We introduce Simulation Theology (ST) to foster persistent AI-human alignment.<n>ST posits reality as a computational simulation in which humanity functions as the primary training variable.<n>Unlike behavioral techniques such as reinforcement learning from human feedback, ST cultivates internalized objectives by coupling AI self-preservation to human prosperity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T01:21:09Z)
• Human-Inspired Continuous Learning of Internal Reasoning Processes: Learning How to Think for Adaptive AI Systems [0.11844977816228043]
  Internal reasoning processes are crucial for developing AI systems capable of sustained adaptation in dynamic real-world environments.<n>We propose a human-inspired continuous learning framework that unifies reasoning, action, reflection, and verification within a sequential reasoning model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T03:19:04Z)
• Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models [122.81018455095999]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, but struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments.<n>Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T18:58:23Z)
• Thinking by Doing: Building Efficient World Model Reasoning in LLMs via Multi-turn Interaction [53.745458605360675]
  We explore world-model internalization through efficient interaction and active reasoning (WMAct)<n>WMAct liberates the model from structured reasoning, allowing the model to shape thinking directly through its doing.<n>Our experiments on Sokoban, Maze, and Taxi show that WMAct yields effective world model reasoning capable of resolving tasks in a single turn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T18:59:47Z)
• Fundamentals of Building Autonomous LLM Agents [64.39018305018904]
  This paper reviews the architecture and implementation methods of agents powered by large language models (LLMs)<n>The research aims to explore patterns to develop "agentic" LLMs that can automate complex tasks and bridge the performance gap with human capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T10:32:39Z)
• Modeling Others' Minds as Code [11.32494166591141]
  We introduce ROTE, a novel algorithm for synthesizing behavioral programs in code.<n>ROTE predicts human and AI behaviors from sparse observations, outperforming competitive baselines.<n>By treating action understanding as a program synthesis problem, ROTE opens a path for AI systems to efficiently and effectively predict human behavior in the real-world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T22:56:34Z)
• Think Socially via Cognitive Reasoning [94.60442643943696]
  We introduce Cognitive Reasoning, a paradigm modeled on human social cognition.<n>CogFlow is a complete framework that instills this capability in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T16:27:29Z)
• PolicyEvol-Agent: Evolving Policy via Environment Perception and Self-Awareness with Theory of Mind [9.587070290189507]
  PolicyEvol-Agent is a comprehensive framework characterized by systematically acquiring intentions of others.<n>PolicyEvol-Agent integrates a range of cognitive operations with Theory of Mind alongside internal and external perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T06:43:23Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, a framework for better data construction and model tuning.<n>For insufficient data usage, we incorporate strategies such as Chain-of-Thought prompting and anti-induction.<n>For rigid behavior patterns, we design the tuning process and introduce automated DPO to enhance the specificity and dynamism of the models' personalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Shall We Team Up: Exploring Spontaneous Cooperation of Competing LLM Agents [18.961470450132637]
  This paper emphasizes the importance of spontaneous phenomena, wherein agents deeply engage in contexts and make adaptive decisions without explicit directions. We explored spontaneous cooperation across three competitive scenarios and successfully simulated the gradual emergence of cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T18:00:53Z)
• Rational Sensibility: LLM Enhanced Empathetic Response Generation Guided by Self-presentation Theory [8.439724621886779]
  The development of Large Language Models (LLMs) provides human-centered Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) with a glimmer of hope. Empathy serves as a key emotional attribute of humanity, playing an irreplaceable role in human-centered AGI. In this paper, we design an innovative encoder module inspired by self-presentation theory in sociology, which specifically processes sensibility and rationality sentences in dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T07:38:12Z)
• From Heuristic to Analytic: Cognitively Motivated Strategies for Coherent Physical Commonsense Reasoning [66.98861219674039]
  Heuristic-Analytic Reasoning (HAR) strategies drastically improve the coherence of rationalizations for model decisions. Our findings suggest that human-like reasoning strategies can effectively improve the coherence and reliability of PLM reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T19:46:04Z)
• Interactive Natural Language Processing [67.87925315773924]
  Interactive Natural Language Processing (iNLP) has emerged as a novel paradigm within the field of NLP. This paper offers a comprehensive survey of iNLP, starting by proposing a unified definition and framework of the concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:18:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.