Paper2Rebuttal: A Multi-Agent Framework for Transparent Author Response Assistance
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14171v1
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 17:23:51 GMT
- Title: Paper2Rebuttal: A Multi-Agent Framework for Transparent Author Response Assistance
- Authors: Qianli Ma, Chang Guo, Zhiheng Tian, Siyu Wang, Jipeng Xiao, Yuanhao Yue, Zhipeng Zhang,
- Abstract summary: $textbfRebuttalAgent$ is a new multi-agents framework that reframes rebuttal generation as an evidence-centric planning task.<n>Our system decomposes complex feedback into atomic concerns and dynamically constructs hybrid contexts.<n>By generating an inspectable response plan before drafting, $textbfRebuttalAgent$ ensures that every argument is explicitly anchored in internal or external evidence.
- Score: 23.470768802111007
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Writing effective rebuttals is a high-stakes task that demands more than linguistic fluency, as it requires precise alignment between reviewer intent and manuscript details. Current solutions typically treat this as a direct-to-text generation problem, suffering from hallucination, overlooked critiques, and a lack of verifiable grounding. To address these limitations, we introduce $\textbf{RebuttalAgent}$, the first multi-agents framework that reframes rebuttal generation as an evidence-centric planning task. Our system decomposes complex feedback into atomic concerns and dynamically constructs hybrid contexts by synthesizing compressed summaries with high-fidelity text while integrating an autonomous and on-demand external search module to resolve concerns requiring outside literature. By generating an inspectable response plan before drafting, $\textbf{RebuttalAgent}$ ensures that every argument is explicitly anchored in internal or external evidence. We validate our approach on the proposed $\textbf{RebuttalBench}$ and demonstrate that our pipeline outperforms strong baselines in coverage, faithfulness, and strategic coherence, offering a transparent and controllable assistant for the peer review process. Code will be released.
Related papers
- LaSER: Internalizing Explicit Reasoning into Latent Space for Dense Retrieval [74.72139580745511]
LaSER is a novel self-distillation framework that internalizes explicit reasoning into the latent space of retrievers.<n>Our method successfully combines the reasoning depth of explicit CoT pipelines with the inference efficiency of standard dense retrievers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T04:11:18Z) - AgenticOCR: Parsing Only What You Need for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation [35.07704681580893]
We introduce AgenticOCR, a dynamic parsing paradigm that transforms optical character recognition (OCR) into a query-driven, on-demand extraction system.<n>By autonomously analyzing document layout in a "thinking with images" manner, AgenticOCR identifies and selectively recognizes regions of interest.<n>AgenticOCR has the potential to serve as the "third building block" of the visual document RAG stack.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T16:09:38Z) - AgentCPM-Report: Interleaving Drafting and Deepening for Open-Ended Deep Research [85.51475655916026]
AgentCPM-Report is a lightweight yet high-performing local solution composed of a framework that mirrors the human writing process.<n>Our framework uses a Writing As Reasoning Policy (WARP), which enables models to dynamically revise outlines.<n>Experiments on DeepResearch Bench, DeepConsult, and DeepResearch Gym demonstrate that AgentCPM-Report outperforms leading closed-source systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-06T09:45:04Z) - OMG-Agent: Toward Robust Missing Modality Generation with Decoupled Coarse-to-Fine Agentic Workflows [9.617220633655716]
We present textbfunderlineOmni-textbfunderlineModality textbfunderlineGeneration Agent (textbfOMG-Agent)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T02:25:40Z) - DeepSynth-Eval: Objectively Evaluating Information Consolidation in Deep Survey Writing [53.85037373860246]
We introduce Deep Synth-Eval, a benchmark designed to objectively evaluate information consolidation capabilities.<n>We propose a fine-grained evaluation protocol using General Checklists (for factual coverage) and Constraint Checklists (for structural organization)<n>Our results demonstrate that agentic plan-and-write significantly outperform single-turn generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T03:07:52Z) - InfiAgent: An Infinite-Horizon Framework for General-Purpose Autonomous Agents [36.740230738304525]
InfiAgent keeps the agent's reasoning context strictly bounded regardless of task duration.<n>InfiAgent with a 20B open-source model is competitive with larger proprietary systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T17:35:57Z) - OpenNovelty: An LLM-powered Agentic System for Verifiable Scholarly Novelty Assessment [63.662126457336534]
OpenNovelty is an agentic system for transparent, evidence-based novelty analysis.<n>It grounds all assessments in retrieved real papers, ensuring verifiable judgments.<n>OpenNovelty aims to empower the research community with a scalable tool that promotes fair, consistent, and evidence-backed peer review.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-04T15:48:51Z) - HalluGraph: Auditable Hallucination Detection for Legal RAG Systems via Knowledge Graph Alignment [0.0]
We introduce HalluGraph, a graph-theoretic framework that quantifies hallucinations through structural alignment between knowledge graphs extracted from context, query, and response.<n>Our approach produces bounded, interpretable metrics into textitEntity Grounding (EG), measuring whether entities in the response appear in source documents, and textitRelation Preservation (RP), verifying that asserted relationships are supported by context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-01T13:31:06Z) - Connecting the Dots: Training-Free Visual Grounding via Agentic Reasoning [63.109585527799005]
GroundingAgent is a visual grounding framework that operates without task-specific fine-tuning.<n>It achieves an average zero-shot grounding accuracy of 65.1 % on widely-used benchmarks.<n>It also offers strong interpretability, transparently illustrating each reasoning step.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-24T03:11:08Z) - Hallucination-Resistant, Domain-Specific Research Assistant with Self-Evaluation and Vector-Grounded Retrieval [0.0]
RA-FSM is a GPT-based research assistant that wraps generation in a finite-state control loop: Relevance -> Confidence -> Knowledge.<n>The controller filters out-of-scope queries, scores answerability, decomposes questions, and triggers retrieval only when needed.<n>We implement the system for photonics and evaluate it on six task categories: analytical reasoning, numerical analysis, methodological critique, comparative synthesis, factual extraction, and application design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T21:35:46Z) - WebWeaver: Structuring Web-Scale Evidence with Dynamic Outlines for Open-Ended Deep Research [73.58638285105971]
This paper tackles textbfopen-ended deep research (OEDR), a complex challenge where AI agents must synthesize vast web-scale information into insightful reports.<n>We introduce textbfWebWeaver, a novel dual-agent framework that emulates the human research process.<n>Our framework establishes a new state-of-the-art across major OEDR benchmarks, including DeepResearch Bench, DeepConsult, and DeepResearchGym.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-16T17:57:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.