From Chaos to Clarity: Schema-Constrained AI for Auditable Biomedical Evidence Extraction from Full-Text PDFs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14267v1
• Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 00:43:53 GMT
• Title: From Chaos to Clarity: Schema-Constrained AI for Auditable Biomedical Evidence Extraction from Full-Text PDFs
• Authors: Pouria Mortezaagha, Joseph Shaw, Bowen Sun, Arya Rahgozar,
• Abstract summary: Existing document AI systems are limited by OCR errors, long-document fragmentation, constrained throughput, and insufficient auditability for high-stakes synthesis.<n>We present a schema-constrained AI extraction system that transforms full-text biomedical PDFs into structured, analysis-ready records.
• Score: 2.136797327390818
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Biomedical evidence synthesis relies on accurate extraction of methodological, laboratory, and outcome variables from full-text research articles, yet these variables are embedded in complex scientific PDFs that make manual abstraction time-consuming and difficult to scale. Existing document AI systems remain limited by OCR errors, long-document fragmentation, constrained throughput, and insufficient auditability for high-stakes synthesis. We present a schema-constrained AI extraction system that transforms full-text biomedical PDFs into structured, analysis-ready records by explicitly restricting model inference through typed schemas, controlled vocabularies, and evidence-gated decisions. Documents are ingested using resume-aware hashing, partitioned into caption-aware page-level chunks, and processed asynchronously under explicit concurrency controls. Chunk-level outputs are deterministically merged into study-level records using conflict-aware consolidation, set-based aggregation, and sentence-level provenance to support traceability and post-hoc audit. Evaluated on a corpus of studies on direct oral anticoagulant level measurement, the pipeline processed all documents without manual intervention, maintained stable throughput under service constraints, and exhibited strong internal consistency across document chunks. Iterative schema refinement substantially improved extraction fidelity for synthesis-critical variables, including assay classification, outcome definitions, follow-up duration, and timing of measurement. These results demonstrate that schema-constrained, provenance-aware extraction enables scalable and auditable transformation of heterogeneous scientific PDFs into structured evidence, aligning modern document AI with the transparency and reliability requirements of biomedical evidence synthesis.

Related papers

• Diagnosing Structural Failures in LLM-Based Evidence Extraction for Meta-Analysis [0.8193467416247519]
  Review and meta-analyses rely on converting narrative articles into structured, numerically grounded study records.<n>Despite rapid advances in large language models (LLMs), it remains unclear whether they can meet the structural requirements of this process.<n>We propose a structural, diagnostic framework that evaluates LLM-based evidence extraction as a progression of schema-constrained queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T14:09:43Z)
• AI Co-Scientist for Knowledge Synthesis in Medical Contexts: A Proof of Concept [0.0]
  We present an AI for scalable and transparent knowledge synthesis based on explicit formalization of Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study design (PICOS)<n>The platform integrates relational storage, vector-based semantic retrieval, and a Neo4j knowledge graph.<n>Results show that PICOS-aware and explainable natural language processing can improve the scalability, transparency, and efficiency of evidence synthesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T23:07:58Z)
• DeepSynth-Eval: Objectively Evaluating Information Consolidation in Deep Survey Writing [53.85037373860246]
  We introduce Deep Synth-Eval, a benchmark designed to objectively evaluate information consolidation capabilities.<n>We propose a fine-grained evaluation protocol using General Checklists (for factual coverage) and Constraint Checklists (for structural organization)<n>Our results demonstrate that agentic plan-and-write significantly outperform single-turn generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T03:07:52Z)
• Autoformalizer with Tool Feedback [52.334957386319864]
  Autoformalization addresses the scarcity of data for Automated Theorem Proving (ATP) by translating mathematical problems from natural language into formal statements.<n>Existing formalizer still struggles to consistently generate valid statements that meet syntactic validity and semantic consistency.<n>We propose the Autoformalizer with Tool Feedback (ATF), a novel approach that incorporates syntactic and consistency information as tools into the formalization process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T10:25:12Z)
• WebWeaver: Structuring Web-Scale Evidence with Dynamic Outlines for Open-Ended Deep Research [73.58638285105971]
  This paper tackles textbfopen-ended deep research (OEDR), a complex challenge where AI agents must synthesize vast web-scale information into insightful reports.<n>We introduce textbfWebWeaver, a novel dual-agent framework that emulates the human research process.<n>Our framework establishes a new state-of-the-art across major OEDR benchmarks, including DeepResearch Bench, DeepConsult, and DeepResearchGym.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T17:57:21Z)
• HySemRAG: A Hybrid Semantic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Automated Literature Synthesis and Methodological Gap Analysis [55.2480439325792]
  HySemRAG is a framework that combines Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) pipelines with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)<n>System addresses limitations in existing RAG architectures through a multi-layered approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T20:30:42Z)
• Analise Semantica Automatizada com LLM e RAG para Bulas Farmaceuticas [0.0]
  This work investigates the use of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) architectures combined with Large-Scale Language Models (LLMs) to automate the analysis of documents in PDF format.<n>The proposal integrates vector search techniques by embeddings, semantic data extraction and generation of contextualized natural language responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T17:48:15Z)
• Context-Aware Hierarchical Merging for Long Document Summarization [56.96619074316232]
  We propose different approaches to enrich hierarchical merging with context from the source document.<n> Experimental results on datasets representing legal and narrative domains show that contextual augmentation consistently outperforms zero-shot and hierarchical merging baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T01:14:31Z)
• Unlocking Potential Binders: Multimodal Pretraining DEL-Fusion for Denoising DNA-Encoded Libraries [51.72836644350993]
  Multimodal Pretraining DEL-Fusion model (MPDF) We develop pretraining tasks applying contrastive objectives between different compound representations and their text descriptions. We propose a novel DEL-fusion framework that amalgamates compound information at the atomic, submolecular, and molecular levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T17:32:21Z)
• Readability Controllable Biomedical Document Summarization [17.166794984161964]
  We introduce a new task of readability controllable summarization for biomedical documents. It aims to recognise users' readability demands and generate summaries that better suit their needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-10T14:03:20Z)
• Constrained Abstractive Summarization: Preserving Factual Consistency with Constrained Generation [93.87095877617968]
  We propose Constrained Abstractive Summarization (CAS), a general setup that preserves the factual consistency of abstractive summarization. We adopt lexically constrained decoding, a technique generally applicable to autoregressive generative models, to fulfill CAS. We observe up to 13.8 ROUGE-2 gains when only one manual constraint is used in interactive summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T00:27:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.