Creativity in the Age of AI: Rethinking the Role of Intentional Agency

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15797v1
• Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 09:31:12 GMT
• Title: Creativity in the Age of AI: Rethinking the Role of Intentional Agency
• Abstract summary: We argue that the Intentional Agency Condition (IAC) should be rejected as a general condition of creativity.<n>We show that recent advances in generative AI have rendered the IAC increasingly problematic, both descriptively and functionally.<n>We propose replacing the IAC with a consistency requirement, according to which creativity tracks the reliable generation of novel and valuable products.
• Score: 0.35854592084750364
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Many theorists of creativity maintain that intentional agency is a necessary condition of creativity. We argue that this requirement, which we call the Intentional Agency Condition (IAC), should be rejected as a general condition of creativity, while retaining its relevance in specific contexts. We show that recent advances in generative AI have rendered the IAC increasingly problematic, both descriptively and functionally. We offer two reasons for abandoning it at the general level. First, we present corpus evidence indicating that authors and journalists are increasingly comfortable ascribing creativity to generative AI, despite its lack of intentional agency. This development places pressure on the linguistic intuitions that have traditionally been taken to support the IAC. Second, drawing on the method of conceptual engineering, we argue that the IAC no longer fulfils its core social function. Rather than facilitating the identification and encouragement of reliable sources of novel and valuable products, it now feeds into biases that distort our assessments of AI-generated outputs. We therefore propose replacing the IAC with a consistency requirement, according to which creativity tracks the reliable generation of novel and valuable products. Nonetheless, we explain why the IAC should be retained in specific local domains.

Related papers

• What Makes Creation Human? Authorship, Reasons, and Meaningful Human Control in Generative AI [0.0]
  This paper distinguishes creativity at the level of the work from creative agency at the level of the creator.<n>It argues that human authorship cannot be determined solely by manual intervention, degree of automation, the origin of an initial idea, or final selection authority.<n>The paper proposes dynamic-reflexive tracking (DRT), which requires that a creator's evolving reasons undergo reflective uptake.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T18:32:42Z)
• The Tao of Agency: Autotelic AI, Embedded Agency and Dissolution of the Self [0.0]
  We show that when an agent begins generating its own goals opens the field of autotelic AI.<n>We trace its consequences through intrinsic motivation, resource-driven priors, causal-interventional learning, homeostasis, and embeddedness.<n>The deepest problem with autotelic AI is not how the agent generates goals, but how it generates and relativizes the self to which the goals are assigned.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T08:20:33Z)
• Trustworthy AI Suffers from Invariance Conflicts and Causality is The Solution [80.98492754957466]
  Core trustworthy AI objectives, such as fairness, robustness, privacy, and explainability, are hard to achieve simultaneously.<n>This paper argues that causality is necessary to understand and balance trade-offs in performance and multiple objectives of trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T14:26:28Z)
• Beyond Compliance: How AI Could Help Creative Writers by Refusing Them [25.77405942866036]
  Theoretically, intentional AI non-compliance could introduce such reflection through friction stronger than other bypass-able solutions.<n>We explore reactions to refusals to common requests across writing stages (planning, translating, reviewing)<n>Findings suggest reflective potential depends on heterogeneous preference alignment along situational, cognitive, domain beliefs, and relational dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T06:58:53Z)
• Real-Time Reasoning Agents in Evolving Environments [52.21796134114843]
  We introduce real-time reasoning as a new problem formulation for agents in evolving environments.<n>Our work establishes real-time reasoning as a critical testbed for developing practical agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T00:51:02Z)
• A Pragmatic View of AI Personhood [45.069027101429704]
  Agentic Artificial Intelligence is set to trigger a "Cambrian explosion" of new kinds of personhood.<n>This paper proposes a pragmatic framework for navigating this diversification.<n>We argue that this traditional bundle can be unbundled, creating bespoke solutions for different contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T11:36:34Z)
• A Theory of Information, Variation, and Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  A growing body of empirical work suggests that the widespread adoption of generative AI produces a significant homogenizing effect on information, creativity, and cultural production.<n>This paper argues that the very homogenization that flattens knowledge within specialized domains simultaneously renders that knowledge into consistent modules that can be recombined across them.<n>The paper concludes by outlining the cognitive and institutional scaffolds required to resolve this tension, arguing they are the decisive variable that determine whether generative AI becomes an instrument of innovation or homogenization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T16:21:13Z)
• The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
  We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z)
• Toward a Theory of Agents as Tool-Use Decision-Makers [89.26889709510242]
  We argue that true autonomy requires agents to be grounded in a coherent epistemic framework that governs what they know, what they need to know, and how to acquire that knowledge efficiently.<n>We propose a unified theory that treats internal reasoning and external actions as equivalent epistemic tools, enabling agents to systematically coordinate introspection and interaction.<n>This perspective shifts the design of agents from mere action executors to knowledge-driven intelligence systems, offering a principled path toward building foundation agents capable of adaptive, efficient, and goal-directed behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T07:52:16Z)
• Towards Responsible AI Music: an Investigation of Trustworthy Features for Creative Systems [1.976667849039851]
  Generative AI is radically changing the creative arts, by fundamentally transforming the way we create and interact with cultural artefacts.<n>This technology also raises ethical, societal, and legal concerns.<n>Key among these are the potential displacement of human creativity, copyright infringement stemming from vast training datasets, and the lack of transparency, explainability, and fairness mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T15:54:47Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences.<n>First, it is not sustainable, as, despite efficiency improvements, its compute demands increase faster than model performance.<n>Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• Building Artificial Intelligence with Creative Agency and Self-hood [0.0]
  This paper is an invited layperson summary for The Academic of the paper referenced on the last page. We summarize how the formal framework of autocatalytic networks offers a means of modeling the origins of self-organizing, self-sustaining structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T22:28:11Z)
• The Dearth of the Author in AI-Supported Writing [2.113447936889669]
  We argue that the dearth of the author helps to explain a number of recurring difficulties and anxieties around AI-based writing support tools. It also suggests an ambitious new goal for AI-based writing support tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T05:23:03Z)
• Prompting the E-Brushes: Users as Authors in Generative AI [0.0]
  The Copyright Office, in its March 2023 Guidance, argues against users of Generative AI being eligible for copyright protection. This Article challenges this viewpoint and advocates for the recognition of Generative AI users who incorporate these tools into their creative endeavors. Rather than dismissing the contributions generated by AI, this Article suggests a simplified and streamlined registration process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T02:20:14Z)
• Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
  We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions. In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z)
• Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
  We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.