CLM-Bench: Benchmarking and Analyzing Cross-lingual Misalignment of LLMs in Knowledge Editing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17397v1
• Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 09:55:34 GMT
• Title: CLM-Bench: Benchmarking and Analyzing Cross-lingual Misalignment of LLMs in Knowledge Editing
• Authors: Yucheng Hu, Wei Zhou, Juesi Xiao,
• Abstract summary: We propose CLM-Bench, a culture-aware benchmark constructed using a native Chinese-first methodology.<n>We conduct extensive experiments on representative LLMs and reveal a significant Cross-lingual Misalignment.<n>Our findings challenge the effectiveness of current methods in cross-lingual transfer and underscore the importance of culturally native benchmarks.
• Score: 5.137059606366328
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Knowledge Editing (KE) has emerged as a promising paradigm for updating facts in Large Language Models (LLMs) without retraining. However, progress in Multilingual Knowledge Editing (MKE) is currently hindered by biased evaluation frameworks. We observe that existing MKE benchmarks are typically constructed by mechanically translating English-centric datasets into target languages (e.g., English-to-Chinese). This approach introduces translation artifacts and neglects culturally specific entities native to the target language, failing to reflect the true knowledge distribution of LLMs. To address this, we propose CLM-Bench, a culture-aware benchmark constructed using a native Chinese-first methodology. We curate 1,010 high-quality CounterFact pairs rooted in Chinese cultural contexts and align them with English counterparts. Using CLM-Bench, we conduct extensive experiments on representative LLMs (e.g., Llama-3, Qwen2) and reveal a significant Cross-lingual Misalignment: edits in one language function independently and fail to propagate to the other. We further provide a geometric explanation via layer-wise representation analysis, demonstrating that edit vectors for Chinese and English are nearly orthogonal -- residing in disjoint subspaces -- while mixed-lingual editing exhibits linear additivity of these vectors. Our findings challenge the effectiveness of current methods in cross-lingual transfer and underscore the importance of culturally native benchmarks.

Related papers

• Code-Switching In-Context Learning for Cross-Lingual Transfer of Large Language Models [64.54005959758733]
  We introduce code-switching in-context learning (CSICL) as a principled and robust approach for overcoming the translation barrier during inference.<n>We conduct extensive experiments across 4 LLMs, 6 datasets, and 10 languages, spanning both knowledge-intensive and reasoning-oriented domains.<n>Our results demonstrate CSICL consistently outperforms X-ICL baselines, achieving gains of 3.1%p and 1.9%p in both target and unseen languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T08:35:42Z)
• Language Surgery in Multilingual Large Language Models [39.66404344691661]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable generalization capabilities across tasks and languages.<n>This paper investigates the naturally emerging representation alignment in LLMs, particularly in the middle layers.<n>We propose Inference-Time Language Control (ITLC), a novel method that leverages latent injection to enable precise cross-lingual language control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T11:09:50Z)
• Lost in Multilinguality: Dissecting Cross-lingual Factual Inconsistency in Transformer Language Models [49.16690802656554]
  We find that Multilingual factual models struggle to provide consistent responses to semantically equivalent prompts in different languages.<n>We propose a linear shortcut method that bypasses computations in the final layers, enhancing both prediction accuracy and cross-lingual consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T19:43:10Z)
• The Hidden Space of Safety: Understanding Preference-Tuned LLMs in Multilingual context [0.9130277390156759]
  Alignment tuning has enabled large language models to excel in reasoning, instruction-following, and minimizing harmful generations.<n>Despite their widespread deployment, these models exhibit a monolingual bias, raising concerns about the effectiveness of alignment across languages.<n>Current alignment methods predominantly focus on English, leaving it unclear how alignment mechanism generalizes to multilingual settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T15:46:46Z)
• How Do Multilingual Language Models Remember Facts? [50.13632788453612]
  We show that previously identified recall mechanisms in English largely apply to multilingual contexts.<n>We localize the role of language during recall, finding that subject enrichment is language-independent.<n>In decoder-only LLMs, FVs compose these two pieces of information in two separate stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T11:39:34Z)
• Cross-Lingual Multi-Hop Knowledge Editing [53.028586843468915]
  We propose the Cross-Lingual Multi-Hop Knowledge Editing paradigm, for measuring and analyzing the performance of various SoTA knowledge editing techniques in a cross-lingual setup.<n>Specifically, we create a parallel cross-lingual benchmark, CROLIN-MQUAKE for measuring the knowledge editing capabilities.<n>Following this, we propose a significantly improved system for cross-lingual multi-hop knowledge editing, CLEVER-CKE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T17:18:16Z)
• CIF-Bench: A Chinese Instruction-Following Benchmark for Evaluating the Generalizability of Large Language Models [53.9835961434552]
  We introduce the Chinese Instruction-Following Benchmark (CIF-Bench) to evaluate the generalizability of large language models (LLMs) to the Chinese language. CIF-Bench comprises 150 tasks and 15,000 input-output pairs, developed by native speakers to test complex reasoning and Chinese cultural nuances. To mitigate data contamination, we release only half of the dataset publicly, with the remainder kept private, and introduce diversified instructions to minimize score variance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T16:02:12Z)
• Cross-Lingual Consistency of Factual Knowledge in Multilingual Language Models [7.478369203246005]
  We study the cross-lingual consistency (CLC) of factual knowledge in various multilingual PLMs.<n>We propose a Ranking-based Consistency (RankC) metric to evaluate knowledge consistency across languages independently from accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T13:19:17Z)
• Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models [73.12622532088564]
  Knowledge editing has been shown to adapt large language models to new knowledge without retraining from scratch. It is still unknown the effect of source language editing on a different target language. We first collect a large-scale cross-lingual synthetic dataset by translating ZsRE from English to Chinese.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T11:07:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.